• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会关系结构方程模型中的潜在互惠参与和准确性变量

Latent Reciprocal Engagement and Accuracy Variables in Social Relations Structural Equation Modeling.

作者信息

Jendryczko David, Nussbeck Fridtjof W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):115-137. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2386060. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1080/00273171.2024.2386060
PMID:39109841
Abstract

The social relations model (SRM) is the standard approach for analyzing dyadic data stemming from round-robin designs. The model can be used to estimate correlation-coefficients that reflect the overall reciprocity or accuracy of judgements for individual and dyads on the sample- or population level. Within the social relations structural equation modeling framework and on the statistical grounding of stochastic measurement and classical test theory, we show how the multiple indicator SRM can be modified to capture inter-individual and inter-dyadic differences in reciprocal engagement or inter-individual differences in reciprocal accuracy. All models are illustrated on an open-access round-robin data set containing measures of mimicry, liking, and meta-liking (the belief to be liked). Results suggest that people who engage more strongly in reciprocal mimicry are liked more after an interaction with someone and that overestimating one's own popularity is strongly associated with being liked less. Further applications, advantages and limitations of the models are discussed.

摘要

社会关系模型(SRM)是分析源自循环设计的二元数据的标准方法。该模型可用于估计相关系数,这些系数反映了样本或总体层面上个体和二元组判断的总体互惠性或准确性。在社会关系结构方程建模框架内,基于随机测量和经典测试理论的统计基础,我们展示了如何修改多指标SRM以捕捉互惠参与中的个体间和二元组间差异,或互惠准确性中的个体间差异。所有模型都通过一个包含模仿、喜欢和元喜欢(被喜欢的信念)测量的开放获取循环数据集进行说明。结果表明,在与他人互动后,更强烈地参与互惠模仿的人更受喜欢,而高估自己的受欢迎程度与较少被喜欢密切相关。还讨论了模型的进一步应用、优点和局限性。

相似文献

1
Latent Reciprocal Engagement and Accuracy Variables in Social Relations Structural Equation Modeling.社会关系结构方程模型中的潜在互惠参与和准确性变量
Multivariate Behav Res. 2025 Jan-Feb;60(1):115-137. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2386060. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
Estimating and investigating multiple constructs multiple indicators social relations models with and without roles within the traditional structural equation modeling framework: A tutorial.在传统的结构方程建模框架内,使用和不使用角色来估计和研究具有多个构造和多个指标的社会关系模型:一个教程。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Oct;29(5):919-946. doi: 10.1037/met0000534. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Disentangling the Sources of Mimicry: Social Relations Analyses of the Link Between Mimicry and Liking.解析拟态的来源:拟态与喜欢之间关系的社会关系分析。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;29(1):131-138. doi: 10.1177/0956797617727121. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
4
Virtual Levels and Role Models: N-Level Structural Equations Model of Reciprocal Ratings Data.虚拟层级和角色模型:交互评分数据的 N 层级结构方程模型。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 May-Jun;53(3):315-334. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1443787. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
Unraveling relationship dynamics in sports teams: A primer on the social relations model.解析运动队中的关系动态:社会关系模型入门
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025 Jan;76:102752. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102752. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Neural precursors of future liking and affective reciprocity.未来喜好和情感互惠的神经前体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 24;115(17):4375-4380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802176115. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model.最大似然估计的社会关系结构方程模型。
Psychometrika. 2020 Dec;85(4):870-889. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09728-z. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
On How to Be Liked in First Encounters: The Effects of Agentic and Communal Behaviors on Popularity and Unique Liking.如何在初次见面时受欢迎:自信行为和合作行为对人气和独特喜爱的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):481-489. doi: 10.1177/09567976221147258. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
9
A social relations analysis of liking for and by peers: associations with gender, depression, peer perception, and worry.同伴之间喜欢与被喜欢的社会关系分析:与性别、抑郁、同伴感知和担忧的关联。
J Adolesc. 2010 Feb;33(1):69-81. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
10
We Know Who Likes Us, but Not Who Competes Against Us.我们知道谁喜欢我们,但不知道谁与我们竞争。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Feb;28(2):233-241. doi: 10.1177/0956797616679440. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Decomposing the True Score Variance in Rated Responses to Divergent Thinking-Tasks for Assessing Creativity: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis.分解用于评估创造力的发散性思维任务的评分反应中的真分数方差:多特质-多方法分析
J Intell. 2024 Sep 27;12(10):95. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100095.