• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在资源匮乏环境下,为了确定癫痫和区分婴儿及儿童特发性癫痫发作的局灶性和全面性癫痫,初步制定并验证了印度尼西亚儿科癫痫问卷(INA-PEPSI)。

Preliminary development and validation of the Indonesian Pediatric Epilepsy Questionnaire (INA-PEPSI) to determine epilepsy and distinguish focal and generalized epilepsy in infants and children with unprovoked seizure in low-resource settings.

机构信息

Department of Child Health, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital-Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Department of Child Health, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2024 Oct;9(5):1868-1880. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13021. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1002/epi4.13021
PMID:39110085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11450670/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To outline the preliminary development and validation of a questionnaire for diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy among infants and children in Indonesia, where electroencephalography and pediatric neurologists are generally not available.

METHODS

A 10-question questionnaire comprising of 43 items was developed through literature review and expert panel discussions. Then, the questionnaire was administered by pediatricians to 75 children aged 1 month to 18 years old presenting with >1 episode of unprovoked seizures at an interval of >24 h. Subsequently, the questionnaire was assessed for content validity with item-level and scale-level content validity indices and ratio, construct validity with item-total correlation tests, criterion validity with diagnostic parameter assessments, and inter-rater reliability using Cohen's kappa (κ) and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficient.

RESULTS

The questionnaire exhibited favorable internal validity and reliability in diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy, with excellent content (both indices and ratio at 1) and construct validity (r > r at p < 0.001), inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.86 and κ = 0.84), and internal consistency (α = 0.634 and α = 0.806). The questionnaire had a sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% (95%CI 89.1-99.5%) and 95.0% (79.5-99.6%) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.946 [0.900-0.992, p < 0.001]) in diagnosing epilepsy and 80.0% (57.4-95.7%) and 97.4% (89.7-99.2%) (AUC 0.889 [0.783-0.995, p < 0.001]) in distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy, with a misdiagnosis rate of 4.0%.

SIGNIFICANCE

The questionnaire shows promising potential in diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing focal and generalized epilepsy. Further external validation studies in larger and more diverse populations are required to confirm our findings.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

The diagnosis of epilepsy in children is challenging, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Indonesia, where advanced diagnostic tests and pediatric neurologists are scarce. The Indonesian Pediatric Epilepsy Questionnaire (INA-PEPSI) is designed to address these limitations by enabling healthcare professionals in Indonesia to diagnose epilepsy and classify its types without relying on advanced diagnostic tools. Although the questionnaire is still in the early stages of development and validation, this study demonstrates that the questionnaire exhibits good overall diagnostic performance in diagnosing epilepsy and distinguishing epilepsy types among Indonesian children.

摘要

目的

描述一种用于诊断印度尼西亚婴儿和儿童癫痫症并区分局灶性和全面性癫痫的问卷的初步开发和验证,因为在那里通常无法进行脑电图和儿科神经科医生检查。

方法

通过文献回顾和专家小组讨论,制定了一个包含 43 个项目的 10 个问题的问卷。然后,由儿科医生对 75 名年龄在 1 个月至 18 岁之间、间隔 >24 小时发作 >1 次无诱因癫痫发作的儿童进行问卷调查。随后,使用项目层面和量表层面的内容有效性指数和比值、项目总分相关性检验、诊断参数评估的构效关系、Cohen's kappa(κ)的组内一致性检验和 Cronbach's alpha(α)系数的内部一致性检验来评估问卷的内容有效性。

结果

该问卷在诊断癫痫症和区分局灶性和全面性癫痫症方面表现出良好的内部有效性和可靠性,具有极好的内容(均为 1)和构效关系(r>r,p<0.001)、组内一致性(κ=0.86 和 κ=0.84)和内部一致性(α=0.634 和 α=0.806)。该问卷在诊断癫痫症方面的灵敏度和特异性分别为 96.4%(95%CI 89.1-99.5%)和 95.0%(79.5-99.6%)(曲线下面积[AUC]0.946 [0.900-0.992,p<0.001]),在区分局灶性和全面性癫痫症方面的灵敏度和特异性分别为 80.0%(57.4-95.7%)和 97.4%(89.7-99.2%)(AUC 0.889 [0.783-0.995,p<0.001]),误诊率为 4.0%。

意义

该问卷在诊断癫痫症和区分局灶性和全面性癫痫症方面具有很大的潜力。需要在更大、更多样化的人群中进行进一步的外部验证研究,以证实我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11450670/d76bb1de4697/EPI4-9-1868-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11450670/aca4a8978b91/EPI4-9-1868-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11450670/d76bb1de4697/EPI4-9-1868-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11450670/aca4a8978b91/EPI4-9-1868-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11450670/d76bb1de4697/EPI4-9-1868-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Preliminary development and validation of the Indonesian Pediatric Epilepsy Questionnaire (INA-PEPSI) to determine epilepsy and distinguish focal and generalized epilepsy in infants and children with unprovoked seizure in low-resource settings.在资源匮乏环境下,为了确定癫痫和区分婴儿及儿童特发性癫痫发作的局灶性和全面性癫痫,初步制定并验证了印度尼西亚儿科癫痫问卷(INA-PEPSI)。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Oct;9(5):1868-1880. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13021. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
A pediatric epilepsy diagnostic tool for use in resource-limited settings: A pilot study.一种用于资源有限环境的儿科癫痫诊断工具:一项试点研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Jun;59:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
3
Generalized onset seizures with focal evolution (GOFE) - A unique seizure type in the setting of generalized epilepsy.伴有局灶性演变的全面性发作(GOFE)——全面性癫痫中的一种独特发作类型。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Jan;54:20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
Idiopathic generalized epilepsies imitating focal epilepsies.模仿局灶性癫痫的特发性全身性癫痫
Epilepsia. 2005;46 Suppl 9:91-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00319.x.
5
[Validation of a questionnaire for epilepsy diagnosis in primary care services].[基层医疗服务中癫痫诊断问卷的验证]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006 Mar;19(3):157-62. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892006000300003.
6
Epilepsy syndromes undetermined whether focal or generalized in infants.婴儿癫痫综合征,局灶性或全身性未明确。
Epilepsy Res. 2006 Aug;70 Suppl 1:S105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
7
Symptomatology of epileptic seizures in the first three years of life.生命最初三年癫痫发作的症状学
Epilepsia. 1999 Jul;40(7):837-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00789.x.
8
The value of 24-hour video-EEG in evaluating recurrence risk following a first unprovoked seizure: A prospective study.24小时视频脑电图在评估首次无诱因发作后复发风险中的价值:一项前瞻性研究。
Seizure. 2016 Aug;40:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
9
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 24;6(6):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub3.
10
Development and validation of the World Health Organization disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Indonesian version in stroke survivors.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)印度尼西亚语版本在中风幸存者中的开发与验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4459-4466. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1900413. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Status of epilepsy in the tropics: An overlooked perspective.热带地区癫痫的现状:被忽视的视角。
Epilepsia Open. 2023 Mar;8(1):32-45. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12686. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
2
Is there a relationship between socioeconomic factors and prevalence, adherence and outcome in childhood epilepsy? A systematic scoping review.社会经济因素与儿童癫痫的患病率、治疗依从性和结局之间是否存在关系?系统范围综述。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2022 May;38:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
3
A children's epilepsy diagnosis aid: Development and early validation using a Bayesian approach.
儿童癫痫诊断辅助工具:基于贝叶斯方法的开发和早期验证。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Aug;121(Pt A):108062. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108062. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
How to distinguish seizures from non-epileptic manifestations.如何区分癫痫发作与非癫痫发作。
Epileptic Disord. 2020 Dec 1;22(6):716-738. doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1234.
5
Seizures in Children.儿童癫痫发作。
Pediatr Rev. 2020 Jul;41(7):321-347. doi: 10.1542/pir.2019-0134.
6
Sample size estimation for health and social science researchers: The principles and considerations for different study designs.健康与社会科学研究人员的样本量估计:不同研究设计的原则与考量
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Apr-Jun;27(2):67-75. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_19_20.
7
The importance of semiological information based on epileptic seizure history.基于癫痫发作病史的症状学信息的重要性。
Epileptic Disord. 2020 Feb 1;22(1):15-31. doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1137.
8
A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach's Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers.克朗巴哈α系数检验样本量确定综述:给研究者的简易指南
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;25(6):85-99. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis.一种用于测量骨质疏松症患者运动的促进因素、障碍和偏好的新工具的开发与验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5.
10
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of a First Unprovoked Seizure in Children and Adolescents With a Focus on the Revised Diagnostic Criteria for Epilepsy.儿童和青少年首次无诱因癫痫发作的诊断与治疗管理,重点关注癫痫的修订诊断标准
J Child Neurol. 2017 Jul;32(8):774-788. doi: 10.1177/0883073817706028. Epub 2017 May 14.