• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估临床环境中的人工智能——让我们不要重新发明轮子。

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings-Let Us Not Reinvent the Wheel.

机构信息

Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e46407. doi: 10.2196/46407.

DOI:10.2196/46407
PMID:39110494
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339570/
Abstract

Given the requirement to minimize the risks and maximize the benefits of technology applications in health care provision, there is an urgent need to incorporate theory-informed health IT (HIT) evaluation frameworks into existing and emerging guidelines for the evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI). Such frameworks can help developers, implementers, and strategic decision makers to build on experience and the existing empirical evidence base. We provide a pragmatic conceptual overview of selected concrete examples of how existing theory-informed HIT evaluation frameworks may be used to inform the safe development and implementation of AI in health care settings. The list is not exhaustive and is intended to illustrate applications in line with various stakeholder requirements. Existing HIT evaluation frameworks can help to inform AI-based development and implementation by supporting developers and strategic decision makers in considering relevant technology, user, and organizational dimensions. This can facilitate the design of technologies, their implementation in user and organizational settings, and the sustainability and scalability of technologies.

摘要

鉴于在医疗保健提供中最小化技术应用风险和最大化其效益的需求,迫切需要将基于理论的健康信息技术(HIT)评估框架纳入现有的和新出现的人工智能(AI)评估指南中。此类框架可以帮助开发者、实施者和战略决策者借鉴经验和现有经验证据基础。我们提供了一个实用的概念概述,介绍了如何使用选定的具体示例,说明现有的基于理论的 HIT 评估框架如何用于为医疗保健环境中 AI 的安全开发和实施提供信息。该列表并不详尽,旨在说明符合各种利益相关者要求的应用。现有的 HIT 评估框架可以通过支持开发者和战略决策者考虑相关技术、用户和组织维度,为基于 AI 的开发和实施提供信息。这可以促进技术的设计、在用户和组织环境中的实施,以及技术的可持续性和可扩展性。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings-Let Us Not Reinvent the Wheel.评估临床环境中的人工智能——让我们不要重新发明轮子。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e46407. doi: 10.2196/46407.
2
Gaps in Artificial Intelligence Research for Rural Health in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国农村卫生人工智能研究的差距:一项范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 27:2025.06.26.25330361. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.26.25330361.
3
Improving AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Their Integration Into Care From the Perspective of Experts: Interview Study Among Different Stakeholders.从专家视角看基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的改进及其在医疗中的整合:不同利益相关者访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 7;13:e69688. doi: 10.2196/69688.
4
Health Care Professionals' Experience of Using AI: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.医疗保健专业人员使用人工智能的体验:系统评价与叙事综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e55766. doi: 10.2196/55766.
5
AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.用于评估人工智能驱动的临床医生工具长期现实世界影响的AI for IMPACTS框架:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e67485. doi: 10.2196/67485.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Safety and User Experience of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Digital Mental Health Intervention: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.生成式人工智能数字心理健康干预的安全性与用户体验:探索性随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e67365. doi: 10.2196/67365.
8
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Are current clinical studies on artificial intelligence-based medical devices comprehensive enough to support a full health technology assessment? A systematic review.基于人工智能的医疗器械的当前临床研究是否足够全面,足以支持全面的健康技术评估?系统评价。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Jun;140:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102547. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
AI in Qualitative Health Research Appraisal: Comparative Study.人工智能在定性健康研究评估中的应用:比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e72815. doi: 10.2196/72815.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes and artificial intelligence beyond the closed loop: a review of the landscape, promise and challenges.糖尿病与闭环之外的人工智能:现状、前景与挑战综述。
Diabetologia. 2024 Feb;67(2):223-235. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-06038-8. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
2
Precision Prevention of Diabetes.糖尿病的精准预防
Diabetes Care. 2023 Nov 1;46(11):1894-1896. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0052.
3
Early experiences of integrating an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic decision support system into radiology settings: a qualitative study.将基于人工智能的诊断决策支持系统整合到放射科环境中的早期经验:一项定性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):24-34. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad191.
4
Babylon looks to sell GP at Hand and other UK business amid financial issues.由于财务问题,巴比伦公司打算出售“随时看全科医生”服务及其他英国业务。
BMJ. 2023 Aug 9;382:1835. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p1835.
5
Triage and Diagnostic Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers: Systematic Review.在线症状检查器的分诊和诊断准确性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e43803. doi: 10.2196/43803.
6
Challenges in evaluating the accuracy of AI-containing digital triage systems: A systematic review.评估含人工智能的数字分诊系统准确性的挑战:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 27;17(12):e0279636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279636. eCollection 2022.
7
The Development and Use of Chatbots in Public Health: Scoping Review.聊天机器人在公共卫生领域的发展与应用:范围综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Oct 5;9(4):e35882. doi: 10.2196/35882.
8
Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI.人工智能驱动的决策支持系统早期临床评估报告指南:DECIDE-AI。
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):924-933. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Radiology artificial intelligence: a systematic review and evaluation of methods (RAISE).放射学人工智能:方法的系统评价和评估(RAISE)。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7998-8007. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08784-6. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review.人工智能在医疗保健中的作用:一项结构化文献综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Apr 10;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01488-9.