Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Na2310, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05761-z.
Applicant perceptions of selection impact motivation and performance during selection, and student diversity. However, in-depth insight into which values underly these perceptions is lacking, creating challenges for aligning selection procedures with applicant perceptions. This qualitative interview study aimed to identify values applicants believe should underlie selection, and how, according to applicants, these values should be used to make specific improvements to selection procedures in undergraduate health professions education (HPE).
Thirty-one applicants to five undergraduate HPE programs in the Netherlands participated in semi-structured interviews using Appreciative Inquiry, an approach that focuses on what goes well to create vision for improvement, to guide the interviews. Transcriptions were analyzed using thematic analysis, adopting a constructivist approach.
Applicants' values related to the aims of selection, the content of selection, and the treatment of applicants. Applicants believed that selection procedures should aim to identify students who best fit the training and profession, and generate diverse student populations to fulfill societal needs. According to applicants, the content of selection should be relevant for the curriculum and profession, assess a comprehensive set of attributes, be of high quality, allow applicants to show who they are, and be adapted to applicants' current developmental state. Regarding treatment, applicants believed that selection should be a two-way process that fosters reflection on study choice, be transparent about what applicants can expect, safeguard applicants' well-being, treat all applicants equally, and employ an equitable approach by taking personal circumstances into account. Applicants mentioned specific improvements regarding each value.
Applicants' values offer novel insights into what they consider important preconditions for the design of selection procedures. Their suggested improvements can support selection committees in better meeting applicants' needs.
申请人对选拔的看法会影响选拔过程中的动机和表现,以及学生的多样性。然而,深入了解这些看法背后的价值观却很缺乏,这给使选拔程序与申请人的看法保持一致带来了挑战。本定性访谈研究旨在确定申请人认为选拔应该基于哪些价值观,以及根据申请人的看法,这些价值观应该如何用于改进本科医疗保健专业教育(HPE)中的选拔程序。
31 名申请人参加了荷兰五个本科 HPE 课程的半结构化访谈,采用欣赏式探询,一种专注于良好方面以创造改进愿景的方法来指导访谈。采用建构主义方法,对转录本进行了主题分析。
申请人的价值观与选拔的目的、选拔的内容和申请人的待遇有关。申请人认为选拔程序应该旨在识别最适合培训和职业的学生,并产生多样化的学生群体以满足社会需求。根据申请人的说法,选拔的内容应该与课程和职业相关,评估一套全面的属性,具有高质量,允许申请人展示自己的真实情况,并根据申请人当前的发展状态进行调整。在待遇方面,申请人认为选拔应该是一个双向的过程,促进对学习选择的反思,对申请人可以期待的内容透明,保障申请人的福祉,平等对待所有申请人,并通过考虑个人情况采用公平的方法。申请人提到了关于每个价值观的具体改进建议。
申请人的价值观为设计选拔程序的重要前提提供了新的见解。他们提出的改进建议可以支持选拔委员会更好地满足申请人的需求。