Chung Seon-Yoon, Park Bu Kyung, Kim Myoung Jin, Rudolph Jenny W, Fey Mary, Simon Robert
College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, 800 Algoma Blvd, Oshkosh, WI, 54901, USA.
College of Nursing, Kyungpook National University, 640 Gukchaebosang-Ro Jung-Gu, Daegu, 41944, Korea.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 8;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00305-3.
Use of the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) would be beneficial for novice debriefers with less or no formal training in debriefing. However, the DASH translated into Korean and tested for psychometrics is not yet available. Thus, this study was to develop a Korean version of the DASH student version (SV) and test its reliability and validity among baccalaureate nursing students in Korea.
The participants were 99 baccalaureate nursing students. Content validity using content validity index (CVI), construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient were assessed.
Both Item-CVIs and Scale-CVI were acceptable. EFA supported the unidimensional latent structure of Korean DASH-SV and results of CFA indicated 6 items converged within the extracted factor, significantly contributing to the factor (p ≤ .05). Items were internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.82).
The Korean version of the DASH-SV is arguably a valid and reliable measure of instructor behaviors that could improve faculty debriefing and student learning in the long term.
使用医疗保健模拟汇报评估工具(DASH)对在汇报方面接受很少或没有接受过正式培训的新手汇报者有益。然而,尚未有翻译成韩语并进行心理测量学测试的DASH。因此,本研究旨在开发韩语版的DASH学生版(SV),并在韩国本科护理专业学生中测试其信效度。
参与者为99名本科护理专业学生。评估了使用内容效度指数(CVI)的内容效度、使用探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)的结构效度以及使用克朗巴赫α系数的内部一致性。
项目CVI和量表CVI均可接受。EFA支持韩语版DASH - SV的单维潜在结构,CFA结果表明6个项目在提取的因素中聚合,对该因素有显著贡献(p≤0.05)。各项目内部一致(克朗巴赫α = 0.82)。
韩语版的DASH - SV可以说是一种有效且可靠的衡量教师行为的工具,从长远来看可以改善教师的汇报和学生的学习。