Robaian Ali
Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, The College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(14):e34112. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34112. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
The dual-silane (trialkoxysilane/aminosilane) universal adhesive (UA) is claimed for its enhanced priming capacity of glass-ceramics.
This study evaluated the effect of organofunctional trialkoxysilane- and organofunctional trialkoxysilane/aminosilane-containing UAs on the long-term resin-ceramic microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and wettability of ceramic.
Hydrofluoric acid-etched lithium disilicate discs were distributed into four groups as follows: (control), no priming was performed; (MBN), primed using a silane-based primer (Monobond N); (SBU), primed using a trialkoxysilane-containing UA (Single Bond Universal Adhesive) and (SBP), primed using a trialkoxysilane/aminosilane-containing UA (Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive). Ceramic discs were cemented into blocks then sectioned into microbeams stored in distilled water at 37° for 1 year. The μTBS was evaluated followed by assessment of the failure modes. The contact angle of the two UAs was measured with a goniometer using the sessile drop technique.
MBN significantly improved the resin-ceramic μTBS (31.71 ± 6.33 MPa) compared to the control group. The resin-ceramic μTBS obtained after priming using SBP (22.83 ± 3.42 MPa) was comparable to those of MBN. SBU showed significantly inferior resin-ceramic μTBS (16.02 ± 6.28 MPa) compared with MBN. Mixed failures mode patterns were the most frequent in the groups. The ceramic wettability of both UAs did not significantly differ.
Ceramic priming using a UA with dual-silane monomers (organofunctional trialkoxysilane/aminosilane) resulted in long-term adhesion comparable to a silane-containing primer. Incorporating aminosilane monomer in UA formulation did not affect the wetting of characteristics of the UA solution and enhanced its glass-ceramic priming capacity.
The use of UA with optimized silane content as a primer for glass-ceramics simplifies clinical adhesive procedures including resin cementation and repair of ceramic restorations.
双硅烷(三烷氧基硅烷/氨基硅烷)通用粘结剂(UA)因其对玻璃陶瓷增强的预处理能力而受到关注。
本研究评估了含有机官能团三烷氧基硅烷和含有机官能团三烷氧基硅烷/氨基硅烷的通用粘结剂对树脂-陶瓷微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)和陶瓷润湿性的长期影响。
氢氟酸蚀刻的二硅酸锂圆盘分为四组:(对照组),不进行预处理;(MBN组),使用基于硅烷的底漆(单键N)进行预处理;(SBU组),使用含三烷氧基硅烷的通用粘结剂(单键通用粘结剂)进行预处理;(SBP组),使用含三烷氧基硅烷/氨基硅烷的通用粘结剂(3M Scotchbond通用增强粘结剂)进行预处理。将陶瓷圆盘粘结到块体中,然后切成微梁,在37℃蒸馏水中储存1年。评估μTBS,随后评估失效模式。使用接触角测量仪通过静滴法测量两种通用粘结剂的接触角。
与对照组相比,MBN组显著提高了树脂-陶瓷μTBS(31.71±6.33MPa)。使用SBP预处理后获得的树脂-陶瓷μTBS(22.83±3.42MPa)与MBN组相当。与MBN组相比,SBU组的树脂-陶瓷μTBS显著较低(16.02±6.28MPa)。混合失效模式在各组中最为常见。两种通用粘结剂的陶瓷润湿性无显著差异。
使用含双硅烷单体(有机官能团三烷氧基硅烷/氨基硅烷)的通用粘结剂对陶瓷进行预处理可产生与含硅烷底漆相当的长期粘结效果。在通用粘结剂配方中加入氨基硅烷单体不会影响通用粘结剂溶液的润湿性,并增强了其对玻璃陶瓷的预处理能力。
使用硅烷含量优化的通用粘结剂作为玻璃陶瓷的底漆简化了包括树脂粘结和陶瓷修复体修复在内的临床粘结程序。