Suppr超能文献

骨科的眼部安全是否被忽视了?年度眼部放射暴露及防护措施的系统评价

Is Ocular Safety in Orthopaedics Overlooked? A Systematic Review of Annual Ocular Radiation Exposure and Protective Measures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1954-1967. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003172. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluoroscopy is increasingly common in orthopaedics, although recent guidelines have reduced the maximum recommended exposure to 20 mSv annually. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to comprehensively assess current adherence to exposure guidelines, identify practice settings at increased risk for exposure, and determine the best practices and personal protective equipment for ocular radiation risk mitigation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review we asked: (1) Is the annual amount of eye irradiation received by orthopaedic surgeons below the recommended limit of 20 mSv? (2) What is the effectiveness of leaded glasses in reducing the eye's exposure to radiation? (3) Which imaging setups and operative techniques reduce ocular irradiation?

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar were queried on September 28, 2023, to identify studies assessing intraoperative ocular radiation exposure among orthopaedic surgeons. Studies that measured radiation in or around the eye (such as the bridge of the nose or eyebrows) during orthopaedic procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were duplicate studies, studies that only estimated eye radiation based on the radiation dose recorded at parts of the body distant from the eyes, nonoriginal research, case reports, and articles without full-text English versions available. A total of 393 unique articles were retrieved, and after title, abstract, and full-text screening, 23 dosimetry studies were included, comprising 12 prospective observational studies, 7 phantom models, 1 cadaver model, 2 observational studies, and 1 randomized control trial. Risk of bias was determined via the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Study quality was generally good to excellent, with noncomparative studies having a mean MINORS score of 14 ± 0 of 16 and comparative studies achieving a mean score of 19 ± 1 of 24, with higher scores representing better study quality. Due to extensive heterogeneity in study design, a meta-analysis was not conducted, with the results rather presented as a narrative summary of key findings.

RESULTS

The vast majority of surgeons conducting a variety of orthopaedic and traumatologic procedures were not exposed to a hazardous level of eye irradiation annually, but surgeons who perform a high volume of fluoroscopy-intensive procedures may exceed guidelines. Leaded eyeglasses reduced eye radiation by about 90%, with sport wrap-around glasses offering better shielding than alternatives, although leaded glasses overall were largely underutilized. Positioning mini C-arms in the standard vertical configuration was shown to provide up to a 13-fold decrease in radiation exposure compared with inverted configuration, while standing perpendicular to the fluoroscope further reduced eye irradiation.

CONCLUSION

We found that orthopaedic surgeons who perform a high volume of fluoroscopy-intensive procedures may be at risk of exceeding recommendations on annual radiation exposure, although exposure can be mitigated through various simple strategies. In particular, this analysis found that the use of sport wrap-around leaded glasses, positioning of mini-C arms in the standard vertical configuration, and standing perpendicular to the fluoroscope provide the most effective means of limiting ocular radiation exposure. As ophthalmic radiation exposure presents a potentially important occupational health hazard to orthopaedic surgeons, further investigations of radiation exposure specific to high-volume, fluoroscopy-intensive orthopaedic practices and long-term ophthalmic outcomes will help determine the extent of the potential harm posed by frequent exposure to intraoperative radiation over the span of a career.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

术中透视在矫形外科中越来越常见,尽管最近的指南已经将推荐的最大暴露量减少到每年 20mSv。我们进行了一项文献系统评价,全面评估当前对暴露指南的遵守情况,确定暴露风险增加的实践环境,并确定眼部放射风险缓解的最佳实践和个人防护设备。

问题/目的:在这项系统评价中,我们询问:(1)矫形外科医生每年接受的眼部照射量是否低于 20mSv 的推荐限值?(2)铅眼镜在降低眼部辐射暴露方面的效果如何?(3)哪些成像设置和手术技术可以减少眼部照射?

方法

2023 年 9 月 28 日,在 PubMed、Medline、EBSCOhost 和 Google Scholar 上检索评估矫形外科医生术中眼部辐射暴露的研究。纳入测量矫形手术过程中眼部(如鼻梁或眉毛)辐射的研究。排除标准为重复研究、仅根据身体远离眼睛部位记录的辐射剂量估计眼部辐射的研究、非原始研究、病例报告以及没有全文英文版本的文章。共检索到 393 篇独特的文章,经过标题、摘要和全文筛选,共纳入 23 项剂量学研究,包括 12 项前瞻性观察研究、7 项体模模型、1 项尸体模型、2 项观察性研究和 1 项随机对照试验。通过非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)工具确定偏倚风险。研究质量总体较好至优秀,非对照研究的 MINORS 平均得分为 14±0 分(满分 16 分),对照研究得分为 19±1 分(满分 24 分),得分越高代表研究质量越高。由于研究设计存在广泛的异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析,而是以关键发现的叙述性总结呈现结果。

结果

绝大多数进行各种矫形和创伤手术的外科医生每年都不会受到眼部辐射的危险水平,但进行大量透视密集手术的外科医生可能会超过指南。铅眼镜可将眼部辐射降低约 90%,运动型全包眼镜比其他替代品提供更好的屏蔽效果,尽管铅眼镜总体上的使用率仍然较低。将微型 C 臂定位在标准垂直配置中,与倒置配置相比,可将辐射暴露降低 13 倍,而垂直于透视仪站立可进一步降低眼部辐射。

结论

我们发现,进行大量透视密集手术的矫形外科医生可能面临超过年度辐射暴露建议的风险,但可以通过各种简单的策略来减轻辐射。特别是,这项分析发现,使用运动型全包铅眼镜、将微型 C 臂定位在标准垂直配置中以及垂直于透视仪站立,是限制眼部辐射暴露的最有效方法。由于眼科辐射暴露对矫形外科医生来说是一个潜在的重要职业健康危害,因此对高容量、透视密集型矫形实践中特定的辐射暴露和长期眼科结果进行进一步研究,将有助于确定在职业生涯中频繁暴露于术中辐射所带来的潜在危害程度。

证据等级

III 级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验