Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, The New York Hip Institute, 485 Madison Ave. 8th Floor, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone - Long Island, Mineola, NY, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3823-3831. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05453-9. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
The influence of prior colostomy or ileostomy on patients undergoing joint arthroplasty remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to assess whether patients with an ostomy undergoing hip and knee arthroplasties have worse postoperative outcomes and increased rates of revisions.
A single-center, retrospective review of patients with a history of bowel ostomy who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2012 to 2021. A total of 24 THAs, 11 HAs, and 25 TKAs in patients with open small or large bowel stoma were identified. A ten-to-one propensity score match was utilized to establish cohorts with comparable demographics but no prior ostomy procedure.
Patients with stomas undergoing elective THA showed greater 90-day ED visits (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day all-cause readmissions (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day non-orthopedic readmissions (10.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), 90-day readmissions for infection (5.0 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.043), all-cause revisions (15.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), revisions for PJI (5.0 vs. 0%, P = 0.043), and revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (10.0 vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with stomas undergoing non-elective hip arthroplasties exhibited a longer mean LOS (12.1 vs. 7.0 days, P < 0.001) and increased 90-day all-cause readmissions (40.0 vs. 17.3%, P = 0.034), 90-day orthopedic readmissions (26.7 vs. 6.0%, P = 0.005), all-cause revisions (13.3 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.015), revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002), and revisions for aseptic loosening (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in readmission or revision rates between ostomy patients undergoing TKA and a matched control group.
Patients undergoing hip arthroplasties with an open stoma are at an increased risk of hospital encounters and revisions, whereas TKA patients with stomas are not at increased risk of complications. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique challenges associated with this patient population.
既往结肠造口或回肠造口术对接受关节置换术患者的影响仍知之甚少。本研究旨在评估接受过造口术的患者在接受髋关节和膝关节置换术后是否有更差的术后结果和更高的翻修率。
对 2012 年至 2021 年期间接受过原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)、半髋关节置换术(HA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的有肠造口术病史的患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。共发现 24 例 THA、11 例 HA 和 25 例 TKA 患者有开放性小肠或大肠造口术。利用 10:1 的倾向评分匹配来建立具有可比人口统计学特征但无既往造口术的队列。
接受择期 THA 的造口术患者在 90 天内急诊就诊(20.0%比 5.0%,P=0.009)、90 天内全因再入院(20.0%比 5.0%,P=0.009)、90 天内非骨科再入院(10.0%比 0.5%,P<0.001)、90 天内感染性再入院(5.0%比 0.5%,P=0.043)、全因翻修(15.0%比 0.5%,P<0.001)、翻修为 PJI(5.0%比 0%,P=0.043)和翻修为假体周围骨折(10.0%比 0%,P<0.001)。接受非择期髋关节置换术的造口术患者的平均 LOS 更长(12.1 天比 7.0 天,P<0.001),90 天内全因再入院率更高(40.0%比 17.3%,P=0.034)、90 天内骨科再入院率(26.7%比 6.0%,P=0.005)、全因翻修率(13.3%比 2.0%,P=0.015)、翻修为假体周围骨折(6.7%比 0%,P=0.002)和翻修为无菌性松动(6.7%比 0%,P=0.002)。造口术患者行 TKA 与匹配对照组的再入院或翻修率无显著差异。
接受髋关节置换术的有造口术的患者发生医院就诊和翻修的风险增加,而接受 TKA 的有造口术的患者则没有增加并发症的风险。这些发现强调了认识和解决这一患者群体相关独特挑战的重要性。