Sexually transmitted infections among at-risk women in Ecuador: implications for global prevalence and testing practices for STIs detected only at the anorectum in female sex workers.

OBJECTIVES

Anorectal sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as (CT) and (NG), present treatment challenges, potentially increase antibiotic resistance selection and if undetected may facilitate onward transmission. However, there are limited global prevalence data for anorectal STIs. We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence and risk factors of non-viral genital and extragenital STIs in female sex workers (FSW) and female non-sex workers (NSW) in Ecuador.

METHODS

250 adult street and brothel FSWs and 250 NSWs, recruited from settlements in north-west Ecuador provided oropharyngeal and vulvo-vaginal swabs (VVS) as well as socio-demographic data. FSWs also provided anorectal swabs. PCR was used to detect CT, NG, (MG) from all swabs and additionally (TV) from VVS. Risk factors were analysed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Prevalence of FSW vaginal, anorectal and oropharyngeal infection was 32.0% (95% CI 26.5% to 38.0%), 19.7% (95% CI 15.1% to 25.2%) and 3.2% (95% CI 1.6% to 6.2%), respectively, with most vaginal infections being TV (23.4%; 95% CI 18.5% to 29.2%). Overall FSW STI prevalence, at any anatomical site was 39.7% (95% CI 33.8% to 46.1%), with 12.1% (95% CI 8.5% to 16.9%) of infections detected only at the anorectum. Of all the CT and/or NG infections, 64.4% (95% CI 50.4% to 78.4%) were detected only at the anorectum. STI prevalence in NSWs in the vagina and oropharynx were 5.6% (95% CI 3.4% to 9.2%) and 0.8% (95% CI 0.2% to 2.9%), respectively, with most vaginal infections being MG (3.2%; 95% CI 1.6% to 6.2%). In multivariable analysis, risk factors among brothel-based FSWs for having an anorectal STI were vaginal CT, NG or MG (p<0.001), vaginal TV (p=0.029) and being 'in a relationship' (p=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

High prevalence of CT and NG detected only at the anorectum in these FSWs indicate the possibility of missing significant infections if providing only genital testing and calls for greater research into the potential impact on global STI estimates if extragenital infections among at-risk women are not identified.