Suppr超能文献

不同类型和实施方式的正念干预对乳腺癌患者抑郁的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析方案

Comparative effect of different mindfulness-based intervention types and deliveries on depression in patients with breast cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Deqi, Zhao Wenxin, Yuan Lin, Chen Qiang, Xu Qiling, Jiang Xiaoyu, Bi Hongyan

机构信息

College of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Clinical Medical College, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e084564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084564.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer has become the most common cancer worldwide. Various types of mindfulness-based interventions (e.g., mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction) have been conducted in different delivery methods (including face to face and internet delivered) to help patients with breast cancer mitigate their depression. However, at present, there are no studies that compare the effectiveness of all these types and deliveries of mindfulness-based interventions. Therefore, this protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of various types and deliveries of mindfulness-based interventions in mitigating depression in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

This protocol is according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, The China National Knowledge Infrastructure and OpenGrey, will be comprehensively retrieved for related randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. Two reviewers will independently assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials 2.0 (RoB 2.0). The network meta-analysis will be performed using the STATA V.16.0, and the assessment of heterogeneity, inconsistency, publication bias, evidence quality, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol does not require approval from an ethics committee as it is based on previous research findings. The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024495996.

摘要

引言

乳腺癌已成为全球最常见的癌症。已采用多种不同的交付方式(包括面对面和互联网交付)开展了各种基于正念的干预措施(例如,基于正念的认知疗法、基于正念减压疗法),以帮助乳腺癌患者减轻抑郁情绪。然而,目前尚无研究比较所有这些类型和交付方式的基于正念的干预措施的有效性。因此,本方案旨在进行一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以评估各种类型和交付方式的基于正念的干预措施在减轻乳腺癌患者抑郁方面的有效性。

方法

本方案遵循系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南。将全面检索电子数据库,包括PubMed、科学网、考克兰图书馆、Embase、谷歌学术、中国知网和OpenGrey,以获取从开始到2023年12月的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。两名评审员将使用考克兰随机试验偏倚风险工具2.0(RoB 2.0)独立评估偏倚风险。将使用STATA V.16.0进行网络荟萃分析,并进行异质性、不一致性、发表偏倚、证据质量、亚组分析和敏感性分析。

伦理与传播

本方案基于先前的研究结果,无需伦理委员会批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024495996。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e854/11404177/f5d64227a5f2/bmjopen-14-8-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验