Marquis-Gravel Guillaume, Mulder Hillary, Wruck Lisa M, Benziger Catherine P, Effron Mark B, Farrehi Peter M, Girotra Saket, Gupta Kamal, Kripalani Sunil, Muñoz Daniel, Polonsky Tamar S, Whittle Jeff, Harrington Robert, Rothman Russell, Hernandez Adrian F, Jones W S
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e078197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078197.
To evaluate whether the effectiveness and safety of low (81 mg daily) versus high-dose (325 mg daily) aspirin is consistent across races among patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
A secondary analysis of the randomised controlled trial ADAPTABLE was performed.
The study was conducted in 40 centres and one health plan participating in the National Patient-Centred Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) in the USA.
Among 15 076 participants with established ASCVD, 14 096 had self-reported race available and were included in the analysis. Participants were divided according to self-reported race as Black (n=1311, 9.3%), White (n=11 990, 85.1%) or other race (n=795, 5.6%).
Participants were randomised to open-label daily aspirin doses of 81 mg versus 325 mg in a 1:1 ratio for a median of 26.2 months.
The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, hospitalisation for myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for stroke. The primary safety endpoint was hospitalisation for bleeding requiring blood product transfusion.
Estimated cumulative incidence of the primary effectiveness endpoint at median follow-up with the 81 mg and the 325 mg daily doses were 6.70% and 7.12% in White participants (adjusted HR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.88 to 1.15]); 12.27% and 10.69% in Black participants (adjusted HR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.93]); and 6.88% and 7.69% in other participants (adjusted HR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.54 to 1.39]) (p-interaction=0.12), respectively. There was no significant interaction between self-reported race and assigned aspirin dose regarding the secondary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoints.
Race is not an effect modifier on the impact of aspirin dosing on effectiveness and safety in patients with established ASCVD. In clinical practice, treatment decisions regarding aspirin dose in secondary prevention of ASCVD should not be influenced by race.
NCT02697916.
评估在已确诊动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的患者中,低剂量(每日81毫克)与高剂量(每日325毫克)阿司匹林的有效性和安全性在不同种族间是否一致。
对随机对照试验ADAPTABLE进行二次分析。
该研究在美国参与国家以患者为中心的临床研究网络(PCORnet)的40个中心和1个健康计划中进行。
在15076名已确诊ASCVD的参与者中,14096名有自我报告的种族信息并纳入分析。参与者根据自我报告的种族分为黑人(n = 1311,9.3%)、白人(n = 11990,85.1%)或其他种族(n = 795,5.6%)。
参与者按1:1比例随机分配至开放标签的每日81毫克或325毫克阿司匹林剂量组,中位治疗时间为26.2个月。
主要有效性终点是任何原因导致的死亡、心肌梗死住院或中风住院的复合终点。主要安全性终点是因出血需要输血的住院情况。
在白人参与者中,中位随访时每日81毫克和325毫克剂量的主要有效性终点估计累积发生率分别为6.70%和7.12%(调整后HR:1.00 [95%CI:0.88至1.15]);黑人参与者中分别为12.27%和10.69%(调整后HR:1.40 [95%CI:1.02至1.93]);其他种族参与者中分别为6.88%和7.69%(调整后HR:0.86 [95%CI:0.54至1.39])(p交互作用 = 0.12)。在次要有效性终点和主要安全性终点方面,自我报告的种族与分配的阿司匹林剂量之间没有显著交互作用。
种族不是阿司匹林剂量对已确诊ASCVD患者有效性和安全性影响的效应修饰因素。在临床实践中,ASCVD二级预防中关于阿司匹林剂量的治疗决策不应受种族影响。
NCT02697916。