Avis Geoffrey, Gricourt Yann, Vialatte Pierre Baptiste, Meunier Victor, Perin Mikael, Simon Natacha, Claret Pierre-Geraud, El Fertit Hassan, Lefrant Jean-Yves, Bertrand Martin, Cuvillon Philippe
Staff Anesthesiologists, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU), University Hospital Group Caremeau, Nimes, France.
Département Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo Universitaire Carémeau, Montpellier University 1, Montpellier, France.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Jul 21. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103737.
Erector spinae plane block has been proposed to reduce opioid use and improve pain relief with controversial results. This randomized clinical study aimed to assess the efficacy of erector spinae plane block in major spine surgery including multimodal and 'Enhance Recovery After Surgery' programs.
After institutional review board approval, adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery with standardized general anesthesia, rehabilitation and multimodal analgesia protocols were randomly allocated to receive bilateral ultrasound-guided block with saline versus ropivacaine (3.75 mg/mL). Before surgery, a bilateral erector spinae plane block was performed at lumbar level (third vertebrae) with 20 mL of solution for each side. The primary outcome was morphine consumption after 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and side effects, from postanesthesia care unit to discharge, and questionnaires at 3 months on pain and quality of life (EQ-5D).
From November 2019 to July 2021, 50 patients were enrolled with similar characteristics and surgery for each group. After the first 24 hours, there was no statistical difference regarding cumulative intravenous morphine consumption between ropivacaine and saline groups: 7.3 mg (3.7-19) vs 12.5 mg (3.5-26) (p=0.51). Over the five postoperative days, opioid sparing, pain scores and side effects were similar between groups. At 3 months, pain relief, incidence of chronic pain and EQ-5D were similar between groups.
Erector spinae plane block used in conjunction with 'Enhance Recovery After Surgery' and multimodal analgesia protocols provides limited reduction in opioid consumption and no long-term benefits.
EudraCT 2019-001678-26.
竖脊肌平面阻滞已被提出用于减少阿片类药物的使用并改善疼痛缓解效果,但结果存在争议。这项随机临床研究旨在评估竖脊肌平面阻滞在包括多模式和“术后加速康复”方案的大型脊柱手术中的疗效。
经机构审查委员会批准,接受标准化全身麻醉、康复和多模式镇痛方案的择期腰椎手术成年患者被随机分配接受双侧超声引导下的生理盐水与罗哌卡因(3.75毫克/毫升)阻滞。手术前,在腰椎水平(第三椎体)进行双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞,每侧注入20毫升溶液。主要结局是术后24小时的吗啡消耗量。次要结局包括从麻醉后护理单元到出院的疼痛评分和副作用,以及术后3个月关于疼痛和生活质量(EQ-5D)的问卷调查。
从2019年11月至2021年7月,每组纳入50例具有相似特征和手术情况的患者。术后最初24小时,罗哌卡因组和生理盐水组之间累计静脉注射吗啡消耗量无统计学差异:7.3毫克(3.7 - 19)对12.5毫克(3.5 - 26)(p = 0.51)。在术后五天内,两组之间的阿片类药物节省量、疼痛评分和副作用相似。术后3个月,两组之间的疼痛缓解、慢性疼痛发生率和EQ-5D相似。
竖脊肌平面阻滞与“术后加速康复”和多模式镇痛方案联合使用时,阿片类药物消耗量的减少有限,且无长期益处。
EudraCT 2019 - 001678 - 26。