Zilcha-Mano Sigal, Muran J Christopher
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Psychol Eur. 2024 Apr 26;6(Spec Issue):e12439. doi: 10.32872/cpe.12439. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Repairing alliance ruptures has the potential to serve as a powerful mechanism of change in psychotherapy. In this article, a transtheoretical individual-specific framework for repairing alliance ruptures is proposed. According to the proposed framework, at the intake session, the therapist evaluates the trait-like tendencies of individual patients to face ruptures in interpersonal relationships. We propose a typology based on which patients are assigned to one of the following therapeutic strategies: (a) a treatment where alliance rupture and repair is the main mechanism of change (Type A), (b) an added module that augments another treatment, focusing on rupture and repair (Type B), or (c) treatment where no rupture resolution work is carried out (Type C). The proposed framework is based on cumulative clinical knowledge, and its validity and utility need to be assessed in future research.
修复联盟破裂有可能成为心理治疗中一种强大的改变机制。本文提出了一个用于修复联盟破裂的跨理论个体特异性框架。根据所提出的框架,在初次会谈时,治疗师评估个体患者在人际关系中面对破裂的特质样倾向。我们提出一种类型划分,据此将患者分配到以下治疗策略之一:(a) 以联盟破裂和修复为主要改变机制的治疗(A型),(b) 增强另一种治疗的附加模块,侧重于破裂和修复(B型),或 (c) 不进行破裂解决工作的治疗(C型)。所提出的框架基于累积的临床知识,其有效性和实用性需要在未来研究中进行评估。