• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对安乐死或协助自杀后失去亲人的亲属的善后处理规定:一项针对医生的横断面问卷调查研究。

Aftercare Provision for Bereaved Relatives Following Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Among Physicians.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Expertise Center for Palliative Care Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 25;69:1607346. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607346. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1607346
PMID:39119216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11306013/
Abstract

Relatives of patients who died after euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) might need (specific) aftercare. We examined if and how physicians provide aftercare to bereaved relatives of patients who died after EAS, and which patient-, physician- and process characteristics are associated with providing aftercare. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 127 physicians (general practitioners, clinical specialists, and elderly care physicians) in the Netherlands. Associations were examined using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Most physicians had had at least one follow-up conversation with bereaved relatives (77.2%). Clinical specialists less often provided aftercare compared to GPs. Also, aftercare was more often provided when the deceased had a cohabiting partner. Topics addressed during aftercare conversations included looking back on practical aspects of the EAS trajectory, the emotional experience of relatives during the EAS trajectory and relatives' current mental wellbeing. A minority of aftercare conversations led to referral to additional care (6.3%). Aftercare conversations with a physician covering a wide-range of topics are likely to be valuable for all bereaved relatives, and not just for "at risk" populations typically targeted by policies and guidelines.

摘要

对于那些在安乐死或医师协助自杀(EAS)后去世的患者的亲属来说,他们可能需要(特定的)后续关怀。我们研究了医师是否以及如何为 EAS 后去世的患者的亲属提供后续关怀,以及哪些患者、医师和流程特征与提供后续关怀相关。这项横断面问卷调查研究在荷兰的 127 名医师(全科医生、临床专家和老年护理医生)中进行。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来检查关联。大多数医生都与悲痛欲绝的亲属进行了至少一次后续对话(77.2%)。与全科医生相比,临床专家提供后续关怀的情况较少。此外,当死者有同居伴侣时,提供后续关怀的情况更为常见。在后续关怀对话中讨论的话题包括回顾 EAS 轨迹的实际方面、亲属在 EAS 轨迹中的情绪体验以及亲属目前的心理健康状况。少数后续关怀对话导致转介给额外的护理(6.3%)。与医生进行涵盖广泛话题的后续关怀对话,可能对所有悲痛欲绝的亲属都有价值,而不仅仅是针对政策和指南中通常针对的“高危”人群。

相似文献

1
Aftercare Provision for Bereaved Relatives Following Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Among Physicians.对安乐死或协助自杀后失去亲人的亲属的善后处理规定:一项针对医生的横断面问卷调查研究。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 25;69:1607346. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607346. eCollection 2024.
2
Physicians' views on the role of relatives in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide decision-making: a mixed-methods study among physicians in the Netherlands.荷兰医生对亲属在安乐死和协助自杀决策中的角色的看法:一项荷兰医生混合方法研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Apr 5;25(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01031-1.
3
Relatives' needs in terms of bereavement care throughout euthanasia processes: A qualitative study.亲属在整个安乐死过程中对丧亲关怀的需求:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):3259-3272. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17185. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
Complexities in euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide as perceived by Dutch physicians and patients' relatives.荷兰医生和患者亲属所察觉到的安乐死或医生协助自杀中的复杂性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
"I lost so much more than my partner" - Bereaved partners' grief experiences following suicide or physician-assisted dying in case of a mental disorder.“我失去的不仅仅是我的伴侣”——精神障碍患者自杀或医生协助死亡后,丧偶伴侣的悲伤经历。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04098-5.
6
Complexities in consultations in case of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: a survey among SCEN physicians.在安乐死或医师协助自杀情况下的咨询的复杂性:SCEN 医师的调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 9;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1063-z.
7
Relatives' perspective on the terminally ill patients who died after euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: a retrospective cross-sectional interview study in the Netherlands.亲属对安乐死或医生协助自杀后死亡的绝症患者的看法:荷兰的一项回顾性横断面访谈研究
Death Stud. 2007 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/07481180600985041.
8
Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in People With an Accumulation of Health Problems Related to Old Age: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Among Physicians in the Netherlands.老年累积健康问题患者的安乐死与医生协助自杀:荷兰医生的一项横断面问卷调查研究
Int J Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;69:1606962. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606962. eCollection 2024.
9
The involvement of family in the Dutch practice of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide: a systematic mixed studies review.家庭在荷兰安乐死和医师协助自杀实践中的参与:系统混合研究综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Apr 5;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0361-2.
10
Physicians' experiences with euthanasia: a cross-sectional survey amongst a random sample of Dutch physicians to explore their concerns, feelings and pressure.医生对安乐死的体验:一项针对荷兰随机抽取的医生样本的横断面调查,旨在探讨他们的担忧、感受和压力。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 17;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1067-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Yonder: Improving connections, AI in reflective practice, lung cancer diagnosis, and euthanasia aftercare.《那边》:改善联系、反思性实践中的人工智能、肺癌诊断与安乐死善后护理。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Oct 31;74(748):508. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X739797. Print 2024 Nov.
2
The provision of bereavement care by general practitioners: data from a sentinel network.全科医生提供哀伤关怀:来自一个监测网络的数据。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02625-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences with and needs for aftercare following the death of a loved one in the ICU: a mixed-methods study among bereaved relatives.重症监护病房(ICU)亲人离世后的善后护理经历与需求:一项针对丧亲亲属的混合方法研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Mar 4;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01396-5.
2
Bereavement care and the interaction with relatives in the context of euthanasia: A qualitative study with healthcare providers.安乐死背景下的丧亲护理及与亲属的互动:一项针对医护人员的定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Apr;140:104450. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104450. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences: a systematic review.全科医生对临终关怀学习偏好的看法:系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 21;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01053-9.
4
To Lose a Loved One by Medical Assistance in Dying or by Natural Death with Palliative Care: A Mixed Methods Comparison of Grief Experiences.在接受医疗辅助死亡或在姑息治疗下自然死亡时失去所爱的人:悲伤体验的混合方法比较。
Omega (Westport). 2024 Aug;89(3):931-953. doi: 10.1177/00302228221085191. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
In-Hospital Bereavement Services as an Act of Care and a Challenge: An Integrative Review.作为关怀之举与挑战的院内丧亲服务:一项综合综述
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):e295-e316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Using the Delphi technique to achieve consensus on bereavement care in palliative care in Europe: An EAPC White Paper.运用德尔菲技术达成欧洲姑息治疗中哀伤护理的共识:一份欧洲姑息治疗协会白皮书。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1908-1922. doi: 10.1177/02692163211043000. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
7
Grief After Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.安乐死和医师协助自杀后的悲伤。
Crisis. 2020 Jul;41(4):255-272. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000630. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
8
Family members' opinions about bereavement care after cardiac intensive care unit patients' deaths.家属对心脏重症监护病房患者死亡后的临终关怀的意见。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Jul;24(4):209-221. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12439. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Differences in primary palliative care between people with organ failure and people with cancer: An international mortality follow-back study using quality indicators.器官衰竭患者与癌症患者初级姑息治疗的差异:使用质量指标的国际死亡率回溯研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;32(9):1498-1508. doi: 10.1177/0269216318790386. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
10
Bereavement support standards and bereavement care pathway for quality palliative care.善终支持标准和临终关怀路径,以提供优质的姑息治疗。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Aug;16(4):375-387. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000451. Epub 2017 Jul 13.