• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解驱动中国消费者对基因编辑食品支付意愿的因素。

Understanding the Factors Driving Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene-Edited Foods in China.

作者信息

Gao Shuqing, Chen Jingru, Yang Yuqin, Wang Guoyan

机构信息

School of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):2348. doi: 10.3390/foods13152348.

DOI:10.3390/foods13152348
PMID:39123540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11311454/
Abstract

Gene editing contributes to enhancing food security through the creation of novel foods. However, public perception of gene-edited (GE) foods is crucial to their acceptance and adoption. This study expanded the knowledge-attitude-practice model and constructed an integrated framework comprising four dimensions: demographic factors, scientific literacy and beliefs, social trust, and perceptions of gene technology, aimed at explaining the public's attitudes toward GE foods. A questionnaire survey was conducted ( = 649), revealing a positive attitude toward GE foods, with over 80% expressing a certain willingness to pay (WTP) for them. Factors such as income level, subjective knowledge, scientific beliefs, trust in scientists, trust in government, and trust in national technological capabilities and perceived benefits positively correlated with WTP. Conversely, objective knowledge, perceived risks, and perceived ethical concerns were negatively correlated with WTP. The impact of objective knowledge on attitudes toward GE foods demonstrated a significant, nonlinear relationship. Additionally, it is noteworthy that the Chinese public currently exhibits relatively low trust in national technological capabilities, necessitating vigilance against the emergence of conspiracy theories akin to those surrounding genetically modified foods. This research contributes theoretical insights into the public communication of GE foods.

摘要

基因编辑通过创造新型食品有助于增强粮食安全。然而,公众对基因编辑食品的认知对于其接受和采用至关重要。本研究扩展了知识-态度-行为模型,并构建了一个包含四个维度的综合框架:人口统计学因素、科学素养与信念、社会信任以及对基因技术的认知,旨在解释公众对基因编辑食品的态度。进行了一项问卷调查(n = 649),结果显示公众对基因编辑食品持积极态度,超过80%的人表示愿意为其支付一定费用(WTP)。收入水平、主观知识、科学信念、对科学家的信任、对政府的信任、对国家技术能力的信任以及感知到的益处等因素与支付意愿呈正相关。相反,客观知识、感知到的风险以及感知到的伦理问题与支付意愿呈负相关。客观知识对基因编辑食品态度的影响呈现出显著的非线性关系。此外,值得注意的是,中国公众目前对国家技术能力的信任相对较低,有必要警惕类似于围绕转基因食品出现的阴谋论的出现。本研究为基因编辑食品的公众传播提供了理论见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5634/11311454/fd315a9b009f/foods-13-02348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5634/11311454/f3909684b699/foods-13-02348-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5634/11311454/fd315a9b009f/foods-13-02348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5634/11311454/f3909684b699/foods-13-02348-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5634/11311454/fd315a9b009f/foods-13-02348-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the Factors Driving Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene-Edited Foods in China.了解驱动中国消费者对基因编辑食品支付意愿的因素。
Foods. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):2348. doi: 10.3390/foods13152348.
2
A comparison of EU and US consumers' willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples.欧盟和美国消费者对基因编辑食品的支付意愿比较:来自苹果的证据。
Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105064. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105064. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Will the public pay for green products? Based on analysis of the influencing factors for Chinese's public willingness to pay a price premium for green products.公众愿意为绿色产品买单吗?基于对影响中国公众对绿色产品支付意愿的因素的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(43):61408-61422. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14885-4. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
4
The mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods in Brazil: Consumer's knowledge, trust, and risk perception.巴西强制标识转基因食品:消费者的知识、信任和风险感知。
Food Res Int. 2020 Jun;132:109053. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109053. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
5
Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior.基因编辑肉类:剖析消费者态度与潜在购买行为
Front Nutr. 2022 Apr 5;9:856491. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.856491. eCollection 2022.
6
Public Perceptions and Willingness-to-Pay for Nanopesticides.公众对纳米农药的认知与支付意愿。
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;12(8):1292. doi: 10.3390/nano12081292.
7
The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China.《知信度和社会信任对公众接受转基因食品的影响:来自中国的实证研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207700.
8
How does Information Exposure Affect Public Attitudes Toward GMO in China? The mediating and moderating roles of Conspiracy Belief and Knowledge.信息曝光如何影响中国公众对转基因生物的态度?阴谋论信念和知识的中介与调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 20;13:955541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955541. eCollection 2022.
9
Exploring Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Genetically Edited Food Among Youth in Japan.探究影响日本青年对基因编辑食品接受度的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 23;17(8):2935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082935.
10
Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China.中国城市消费者对低碳农产品支付意愿的影响因素及群体差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010358.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance-Performance Map Analysis of the Drivers for the Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food with a Theory of Planned Behavior Groundwork.基于计划行为理论基础的转基因食品接受度驱动因素的重要性-绩效映射分析
Foods. 2025 Mar 9;14(6):932. doi: 10.3390/foods14060932.

本文引用的文献

1
Driving Factors Influencing the Decision to Purchase Plant-Based Beverages: A Sample from Türkiye.影响购买植物基饮料决策的驱动因素:来自土耳其的样本
Foods. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):1760. doi: 10.3390/foods13111760.
2
Acceptance of Muffins (Sweet and Savory) with the Addition of , Considering Psychological Factors (Food Neophobia Scale, Consumer Attitude).考虑心理因素(食物新恐惧症量表、消费者态度),添加[具体添加物未给出]的松饼(甜口和咸口)的接受度
Foods. 2024 Jun 1;13(11):1735. doi: 10.3390/foods13111735.
3
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.
公众与科学界对基因编辑食品态度的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0300107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300107. eCollection 2024.
4
Genome editing in food and agriculture: from regulations to consumer perspectives.食品与农业中的基因组编辑:从监管到消费者视角。
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2024 Jun;87:103127. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103127. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
U.S. public opinion about the safety of gene editing in the agriculture and medical fields and the amount of evidence needed to improve opinions.美国公众对农业和医学领域基因编辑安全性的看法以及改善看法所需的证据量。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 16;12:1340398. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1340398. eCollection 2024.
6
Consumers' perceptions and acceptance of genome editing in agriculture: Insights from the United States of America and Switzerland.消费者对农业中基因编辑的认知和接受度:来自美国和瑞士的见解。
Food Res Int. 2024 Feb;178:113982. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.113982. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
7
Personal Variables in Attitude toward Green Purchase Intention of Organic Products.影响有机产品绿色购买意愿的个人因素
Foods. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):213. doi: 10.3390/foods13020213.
8
Similarities and differences with the 'general public': Chinese civil servants' attitude to genetically modified organisms and its influencing factors.与“公众”的异同:中国公务员对转基因生物的态度及其影响因素。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2256929.
9
Public Attitudes About the Use of Gene Therapy in Mainland China.公众对中国大陆基因治疗使用的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28352.
10
Editorial: Technological strategies to improve animal health and production.社论:改善动物健康与生产的技术策略
Front Vet Sci. 2023 May 24;10:1206170. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1206170. eCollection 2023.