Cabral Thales W, Neto Fernando B, de Lima Eduardo R, Fraidenraich Gustavo, Meloni Luís G P
Department of Communications, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil.
Copel Distribuição S.A., Curitiba 81200240, Brazil.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;24(15):4965. doi: 10.3390/s24154965.
Load recognition remains not comprehensively explored in Home Energy Management Systems (HEMSs). There are gaps in current approaches to load recognition, such as enhancing appliance identification and increasing the overall performance of the load-recognition system through more robust models. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach based on the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) -test combined with SelectKBest and gradient-boosting machines (GBMs) for load recognition. The proposed approach improves the feature selection and consequently aids inter-class separability. Further, we optimized GBM models, such as the histogram-based gradient-boosting machine (HistGBM), light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), and XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting), to create a more reliable load-recognition system. Our findings reveal that the ANOVA-GBM approach achieves greater efficiency in training time, even when compared to Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a higher number of features. ANOVA-XGBoost is approximately 4.31 times faster than PCA-XGBoost, ANOVA-LightGBM is about 5.15 times faster than PCA-LightGBM, and ANOVA-HistGBM is 2.27 times faster than PCA-HistGBM. The general performance results expose the impact on the overall performance of the load-recognition system. Some of the key results show that the ANOVA-LightGBM pair reached 96.42% accuracy, 96.27% F, and a Kappa index of 0.9404; the ANOVA-HistGBM combination achieved 96.64% accuracy, 96.48% F, and a Kappa index of 0.9434; and the ANOVA-XGBoost pair attained 96.75% accuracy, 96.64% F, and a Kappa index of 0.9452; such findings overcome rival methods from the literature. In addition, the accuracy gain of the proposed approach is prominent when compared straight to its competitors. The higher accuracy gains were 13.09, 13.31, and 13.42 percentage points (pp) for the pairs ANOVA-LightGBM, ANOVA-HistGBM, and ANOVA-XGBoost, respectively. These significant improvements highlight the effectiveness and refinement of the proposed approach.
在家庭能源管理系统(HEMS)中,负载识别尚未得到全面探索。当前的负载识别方法存在差距,例如在通过更强大的模型增强设备识别以及提高负载识别系统的整体性能方面。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种基于方差分析(ANOVA)测试、结合SelectKBest和梯度提升机(GBM)的新颖负载识别方法。所提出的方法改进了特征选择,从而有助于类间可分离性。此外,我们对GBM模型进行了优化,如基于直方图的梯度提升机(HistGBM)、轻量级梯度提升机(LightGBM)和XGBoost(极端梯度提升),以创建一个更可靠的负载识别系统。我们的研究结果表明,即使与主成分分析(PCA)以及更多特征相比,ANOVA - GBM方法在训练时间上也具有更高的效率。ANOVA - XGBoost比PCA - XGBoost快约4.31倍,ANOVA - LightGBM比PCA - LightGBM快约5.15倍,ANOVA - HistGBM比PCA - HistGBM快2.27倍。总体性能结果揭示了对负载识别系统整体性能的影响。一些关键结果表明,ANOVA - LightGBM组合的准确率达到96.42%,F值为96.27%,卡帕指数为0.9404;ANOVA - HistGBM组合的准确率达到96.64%,F值为96.48%,卡帕指数为0.9434;ANOVA - XGBoost组合的准确率达到96.75%,F值为96.64%,卡帕指数为0.9452;这些发现超越了文献中的竞争方法。此外,与竞争对手直接比较时,所提出方法的准确率提升非常显著。ANOVA - LightGBM、ANOVA - HistGBM和ANOVA - XGBoost组合的准确率提升分别为13.09、13.31和13.42个百分点(pp)。这些显著改进突出了所提出方法的有效性和精细度。