Tang Waiching, Onaizi Ali M, Onaizi Sagheer A, Sajjad Umer, Liu Yanju
School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 2;17(15):3834. doi: 10.3390/ma17153834.
Recycling fly ash (FA) and furnace bottom ash (FBA) help with reducing greenhouse gas emissions, conserving natural resources, and minimizing waste accumulation. However, research on recycling FBA is progressing more slowly compared to FA. This research aims to investigate the combined use of FBA as a replacement for both fine aggregate and cement and its influence on the performance of mortar. The findings indicated that incorporating 25% FBA as a fine aggregate replacement and 10% or 20% ground FBA (GFBA) as a cement replacement significantly enhanced compressive strength after 28 and 56 days. Flexural strength was comparable to control mortar at 28 days and superior at 56 days. However, increasing the FBA content beyond 25% as a fine aggregate replacement reduced workability and increased porosity, which negatively affected mechanical performance and water absorption. Microstructural analyses revealed denser and more compact structures in the mortar with combined FBA replacement for both fine aggregate and cement, specifically 25% as a fine aggregate replacement and 10% and 20% as cement replacements. Optimal performance was noted in mixtures with Ca/Si and Ca/Al ratios within the ranges of 1.8-1.5 and 0.24-0.19, respectively. Trace element leaching analysis has not shown significant differences between GFBA, FA, and OPC. Regarding environmental impact assessment, using FBA as a fine aggregate replacement did not show a significant reduction in CO emissions, but replacing cement with FBA reduced emissions remarkably. Generally, using FBA as a replacement for both fine aggregate and cement in mortar enhances compressive and flexural strengths at optimal levels, promotes sustainability by reducing landfill waste and CO emissions, and supports cleaner production practices despite some workability challenges.
回收粉煤灰(FA)和炉底灰(FBA)有助于减少温室气体排放、保护自然资源并最大限度地减少废物积累。然而,与粉煤灰相比,炉底灰回收利用的研究进展较为缓慢。本研究旨在探讨将炉底灰同时用作细集料和水泥替代品的综合利用方法及其对砂浆性能的影响。研究结果表明,用25%的炉底灰替代细集料,并分别用10%或20%的磨细炉底灰(GFBA)替代水泥,可显著提高28天和56天后的抗压强度。28天时的抗折强度与对照砂浆相当,56天时则优于对照砂浆。然而,当作为细集料替代品的炉底灰含量超过25%时,工作性会降低,孔隙率会增加,这对力学性能和吸水率产生了负面影响。微观结构分析表明,在同时用炉底灰替代细集料和水泥的砂浆中,结构更致密、更紧凑,具体而言,用25%的炉底灰替代细集料,用10%和20%的炉底灰替代水泥。在Ca/Si和Ca/Al比值分别在1.8 - 1.5和0.24 - 0.19范围内的混合物中观察到最佳性能。微量元素浸出分析表明,磨细炉底灰、粉煤灰和普通硅酸盐水泥之间没有显著差异。关于环境影响评估,用炉底灰替代细集料并未显著减少碳排放,但用炉底灰替代水泥可显著减少排放。总体而言,在砂浆中用炉底灰替代细集料和水泥,在最佳水平下可提高抗压和抗折强度,通过减少填埋废物和碳排放促进可持续性,并支持清洁生产实践,尽管存在一些工作性方面的挑战。