Kumar Sanjay, Dutta Anghusman, Natraj Rashmi, Kumar Marlapudi Sudheer, Gupta Manish
Department of ENT-HNS, Command Hospital Airforce, Bangalore, Karnataka India.
Audiologist & Speech-Language Pathologist, Department of ENT-HNS, Command Hospital Airforce, Bangalore, India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):3176-3182. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04639-2. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
Introduction: This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of Click Auditory Brainstem Response (Click ABR) and Multiple Auditory Steady-State Response (Multi-ASSR) in identifying hearing impairments in infants. Recognizing auditory issues early is crucial for a child's cognitive and language development, as emphasized by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) and the American Academy of Audiology (AAA). While Click ABR is widely utilized, Multi-ASSR offers a modern technique for detailed hearing assessment. Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted on 111 infants aged 1-6 months, previously screened for hearing at a tertiary care centre. The study employed both Click ABR and Multi-ASSR to evaluate their respective efficacy in assessing infant hearing. Results: Click ABR detected normal hearing in 87.4% of the infants, slightly higher than Multi-ASSR's 84.7%. A noteworthy finding was the higher incidence of bilateral versus unilateral hearing loss, with Click ABR identifying bilateral loss in 10 infants and unilateral loss in 4, compared to Multi-ASSR, which found bilateral loss in 12 infants and unilateral loss in 5. There was a minor but significant difference in auditory thresholds between the methods, with a mean discrepancy of 1.2 dB and a significant statistical variance (-value of 15; < 0.001), indicating variations in sensitivity. Conclusion: Both Click ABR and Multi-ASSR are indispensable tools in paediatric audiology, each with unique advantages. Click ABR excels in efficiency, suitable for rapid assessments and early detection. In contrast, Multi-ASSR offers comprehensive frequency-specific data, facilitating thorough evaluations. Healthcare professionals must grasp these methods' strengths to optimize infant hearing screenings and enhance early intervention strategies, aligning with JCIH and AAA guidelines.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04639-2.
引言:本研究调查了短声听性脑干反应(Click ABR)和多频听觉稳态反应(Multi-ASSR)在识别婴儿听力障碍方面的比较效果。正如婴儿听力联合委员会(JCIH)和美国听力学学会(AAA)所强调的,早期识别听觉问题对儿童的认知和语言发展至关重要。虽然Click ABR被广泛使用,但Multi-ASSR提供了一种用于详细听力评估的现代技术。方法:对111名年龄在1至6个月的婴儿进行了比较分析,这些婴儿之前在三级护理中心接受过听力筛查。该研究采用Click ABR和Multi-ASSR来评估它们在评估婴儿听力方面各自的功效。结果:Click ABR检测出87.4%的婴儿听力正常,略高于Multi-ASSR的84.7%。一个值得注意的发现是双侧听力损失与单侧听力损失的发生率较高,Click ABR识别出10名婴儿为双侧听力损失,4名婴儿为单侧听力损失,而Multi-ASSR发现12名婴儿为双侧听力损失,5名婴儿为单侧听力损失。两种方法之间的听觉阈值存在微小但显著的差异,平均差异为1.2 dB,且有显著的统计方差(-值为15;<0.001),表明敏感性存在差异。结论:Click ABR和Multi-ASSR都是儿科听力学中不可或缺的工具,各有独特优势。Click ABR在效率方面表现出色,适用于快速评估和早期检测。相比之下,Multi-ASSR提供全面的频率特异性数据,便于进行全面评估。医疗保健专业人员必须掌握这些方法的优势,以优化婴儿听力筛查并加强早期干预策略,符合JCIH和AAA的指南。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s12070-024-04639-2获取的补充材料。