Suppr超能文献

比较两种流行的换能器测量老年人从坐到站的功率。

Comparison of two popular transducers to measure sit-to-stand power in older adults.

机构信息

Department of Family, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Queens College, New York, NY, United States of America.

Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 12;19(8):e0308808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308808. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The Tendo Unit (TU) and GymAware (GA) are the two most frequently used linear transducers for assessing muscle power in older adults via the sit-to-stand (STS) test. Unlike TU, GA incorporates a sensor mechanism to correct for non-vertical movements, which may lead to systematic differences between devices. The aim of this study therefore was to compare GA to TU for measuring STS power in community-dwelling older adults. Community-dwelling adults (n = 51, aged ≥65 years, 61% female) completed a single chair stand, with peak power measured simultaneously using GA and TU. Participants also completed the pneumatic leg press, 8-Foot Up and Go (TUG) test, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and self-reported measures of physical function. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were used to assess agreement, and Pearson's correlations were used to assess correlations. The study protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework. In alignment with our pre-registered hypothesis, peak power demonstrated an ICC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.96). For secondary aims, both transducers showed a correlation greater than 0.8 compared to pneumatic leg press power. For physical performance outcomes, both TU and GA showed similar correlations, as hypothesized: SPPB (r = 0.29 for TU vs. 0.33 for GA), Chair Stands (r = -0.41 vs. -0.38), TUG Fast (r = -0.53 vs. -0.52), mobility questionnaire (r = 0.52 vs. 0.52) and physical function questionnaire (r = 0.44 vs. 0.43). GA and TU peak power showed a high degree of agreement and similar correlations with physical and self-reported performance measures, suggesting that both methods can be used for assessing STS power in older adults.

摘要

腾达单位(TU)和 GymAware(GA)是两种最常用于通过坐站(STS)测试评估老年人肌肉力量的线性换能器。与 TU 不同,GA 结合了一种传感器机制来纠正非垂直运动,这可能导致设备之间存在系统差异。因此,本研究的目的是比较 GA 和 TU 在评估社区居住的老年人 STS 力量方面的差异。社区居住的成年人(n=51,年龄≥65 岁,61%为女性)完成了一次椅子站立测试,同时使用 GA 和 TU 测量峰值功率。参与者还完成了气动腿推、8 英尺起立行走(TUG)测试、简短体能表现电池(SPPB)和自我报告的身体功能测量。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估一致性,使用 Pearson 相关系数评估相关性。该研究方案在开放科学框架上进行了前瞻性注册。与我们预先注册的假设一致,峰值功率的 ICC 为 0.93(95%置信区间:0.88,0.96)。对于次要目标,与气动腿推功率相比,两种换能器的相关性均大于 0.8。对于体能表现结果,与假设一致,TU 和 GA 都显示出相似的相关性:SPPB(TU 的 r=0.29 与 GA 的 r=0.33)、椅子站立(r=-0.41 与 r=-0.38)、TUG 快速(r=-0.53 与 r=-0.52)、移动性问卷(r=0.52 与 r=0.52)和身体功能问卷(r=0.44 与 r=0.43)。GA 和 TU 的峰值功率显示出高度的一致性,与身体和自我报告的表现测量具有相似的相关性,这表明这两种方法都可以用于评估老年人的 STS 力量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c0d/11318872/51266badb3d6/pone.0308808.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验