Suppr超能文献

对 GDPR 中不受自动化决策影响的权利的符合健康标准的解读。

A health-conformant reading of the GDPR's right not to be subject to automated decision-making.

机构信息

Law Centre for Health and Life, Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2024 Aug 1;32(3):373-391. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwae029.

Abstract

As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU.

摘要

随着人工智能 (AI) 技术在医疗保健领域的应用不断扩大,欧盟 (EU) 的患者越来越多地面临自动化医疗决策。这一发展对保护患者权利提出了挑战。患者有权不接受自动化医疗决策,这一特定权利并不被视为传统患者权利组合的一部分。欧盟人工智能法案也没有包含这样的权利。然而,《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)第 22 条规定了“不接受仅基于自动化处理的决定”的权利。与此同时,由于缺乏实际效果,这一规定在法律学术界受到了严厉批评。然而,2023 年 12 月,欧盟法院首次在 C-634/21(SCHUFA)案中对这一权利进行了解释——尽管是在信用评分的背景下。在此背景下,本文对 GDPR 第 22 条在医疗背景下的适用进行了批判性分析。目的是评估 GDPR 第 22 条是否可以为患者提供拒绝自动化医疗决策的权利。它提出了一种符合健康的解读,以加强欧盟的患者权利。

相似文献

6
Ethical and Legal Implications of Remote Monitoring of Medical Devices.医疗器械远程监测的伦理和法律问题
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1257-1289. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12481. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation.我们为什么要关心通用数据保护条例以及如何去关心。
Psychol Health. 2019 Nov;34(11):1347-1357. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222. Epub 2019 May 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验