Malhotra Suchi Kapoor, Mantri Swati, Gupta Neha, Bhandari Ratika, Armah Ralph Nii, Alhassan Hamdiyah, Young Sarah, White Howard, Puskur Ranjitha, Waddington Hugh Sharma, Masset Edoardo
Campbell South Asia Vasant Kunj Delhi India.
Global Development Network Vasant Kunj New Delhi India.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 12;20(3):e1428. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1428. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Value chain interventions have become widespread throughout the international development sector over the last 20 years, and there is a need to evaluate their effectiveness in improving women's welfare across multiple dimensions. Agricultural value chains are influenced by socio-cultural norms and gender dynamics that have an impact on the distribution of resources, benefits, and access to opportunities. While women play a critical role in agriculture, they are generally confined to the least-valued parts of the value chain with the lowest economic returns, depending on the local, social and institutional contexts.
The review assesses the effectiveness of approaches, strategies and interventions focused on women's engagement in agricultural value chains that lead to women's economic empowerment in low- and middle-income countries. It explores the contextual barriers and facilitators that determine women's participation in value chains and ultimately impact their effectiveness.
We searched completed and on-going studies from Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection (Social Sciences Citation Index [SSCI], Science Citation Index Expanded [SCI-EXPANDED], Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science [CPCI-S], Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science & Humanities [CPCI-SSH], and Emerging Sources Citation Index [ESCI]), International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, EconLit, Business Source Premier, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews, CAB Abstracts and Sociological Abstracts. We also searched relevant websites such as Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers (CGIAR); the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD); AgriProFocus; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); Donor Committee for Enterprise Development; the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO); the International Labour Organisation (ILO); the Netherlands Development Organisation; USAID; the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation; the International Food Policy Research Institute; World Agroforestry; the International Livestock Research Institute; the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office; the British Library for Development Studies (BLDS); AGRIS; the IMMANA grant database; the 3ie impact evaluation database; Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA); The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL); the World Bank IEG evaluations; the USAID Development Data Library; Experience Clearinghouse; the proceedings of the Agriculture, Nutrition and Health Academy conference; the proceedings of the Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE) Conference; the proceedings of the North East Universities Development Consortium (NEUDC) Conference; and the World Bank Economic Review. The database search was conducted in March 2022, and the website search was completed in August 2022.
The review includes value chain interventions evaluating the economic empowerment outcomes. The review includes effectiveness studies (experimental and non-experimental studies with a comparison group) and process evaluations.
Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, critically appraised the studies, and synthesised findings.
We found that value chain interventions are successful in improving the economic conditions of their intended beneficiaries. The interventions were found to improve women's economic outcomes such as income, assets holdings, productivity, and savings, but these effects were small in size and limited by low confidence in methodological quality. The meta-analysis suggests that this occurs more via the acquisition of skills and improved inputs, rather than through improvement in access to profitable markets. The qualitative evidence on interventions points to the persistence of cultural barriers and other constraints. Those interventions implemented in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia are consistently more successful for all outcomes considered, although there are few studies conducted in other areas of the world.
The review concludes that value chain interventions empower women, but perhaps to a lesser extent than expected. Economic empowerment does not immediately translate into empowerment within families and communities. Interventions should either moderate their expectations of empowerment goals, or they should be implemented in a way that ensures higher rates of participation among women and the acquisition of greater decision-making power.
在过去20年里,价值链干预措施在国际发展领域已广泛普及,有必要评估其在多个维度改善妇女福利方面的有效性。农业价值链受到社会文化规范和性别动态的影响,这些因素会对资源分配、利益以及获得机会产生影响。虽然女性在农业中发挥着关键作用,但根据当地的社会和制度背景,她们通常被限制在价值链中价值最低、经济回报最少的环节。
本综述评估了旨在促进低收入和中等收入国家妇女参与农业价值链从而实现妇女经济赋权的方法、策略和干预措施的有效性。它探讨了决定妇女参与价值链并最终影响其有效性的背景障碍和促进因素。
我们检索了来自Scopus、科学引文索引核心合集(社会科学引文索引[SSCI]、科学引文索引扩展版[SCI-EXPANDED]、会议论文引文索引 - 科学版[CPCI-S]、会议论文引文索引 - 社会科学与人文科学版[CPCI-SSH]以及新兴资源引文索引[ESCI])、国际社会科学文献目录、EconLit、商业资源全文数据库、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库、考克兰对照试验中心注册库、考克兰系统评价数据库、CAB文摘数据库和社会学文摘数据库中已完成和正在进行的研究。我们还检索了相关网站,如国际农业研究磋商组织(CGIAR);国际农业发展基金(IFAD);农业发展聚焦组织;比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会(BMGF);企业发展捐助委员会;联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO);国际劳工组织(ILO);荷兰发展组织;美国国际开发署(USAID);瑞士发展与合作署;国际粮食政策研究所;世界农林中心;国际家畜研究所;外交、联邦及发展办公室;英国发展研究图书馆(BLDS);AGRIS;IMMANA资助数据库;3ie影响评估数据库;扶贫行动创新组织(IPA);阿卜杜勒·拉蒂夫·贾米尔贫困行动实验室(J-PAL);世界银行独立评估小组评估报告;美国国际开发署发展数据库;经验信息交换中心;农业、营养与健康学会会议论文集;非洲经济研究中心(CSAE)会议论文集;东北大学发展联盟(NEUDC)会议论文集;以及世界银行经济评论。数据库检索于2022年3月进行,网站检索于2022年8月完成。
本综述纳入了评估经济赋权成果的价值链干预措施。综述包括有效性研究(有对照组的实验性和非实验性研究)和过程评估。
两位综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入,提取数据,严格评价研究,并综合研究结果。
我们发现价值链干预措施在改善其目标受益人的经济状况方面是成功的。这些干预措施被发现改善了妇女的经济成果,如收入、资产持有量、生产力和储蓄,但这些影响规模较小,且受方法质量的低置信度限制。荟萃分析表明,这种情况更多是通过技能获取和投入改善实现的,而不是通过改善进入盈利市场的机会。关于干预措施的定性证据表明文化障碍和其他限制因素仍然存在。在撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚实施的那些干预措施在所有考虑的成果方面一直更为成功,尽管在世界其他地区进行的研究较少。
综述得出结论,价值链干预措施使妇女获得了赋权,但程度可能比预期的要小。经济赋权并不会立即转化为在家庭和社区中的赋权。干预措施要么适度调整对赋权目标的期望,要么应以确保更高的妇女参与率和获得更大决策权的方式实施。