• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善妇女经济赋权的价值链干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价与荟萃分析:系统评价

Value chain interventions for improving women's economic empowerment: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.

作者信息

Malhotra Suchi Kapoor, Mantri Swati, Gupta Neha, Bhandari Ratika, Armah Ralph Nii, Alhassan Hamdiyah, Young Sarah, White Howard, Puskur Ranjitha, Waddington Hugh Sharma, Masset Edoardo

机构信息

Campbell South Asia Vasant Kunj Delhi India.

Global Development Network Vasant Kunj New Delhi India.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 12;20(3):e1428. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1428. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/cl2.1428
PMID:39135892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11317815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Value chain interventions have become widespread throughout the international development sector over the last 20 years, and there is a need to evaluate their effectiveness in improving women's welfare across multiple dimensions. Agricultural value chains are influenced by socio-cultural norms and gender dynamics that have an impact on the distribution of resources, benefits, and access to opportunities. While women play a critical role in agriculture, they are generally confined to the least-valued parts of the value chain with the lowest economic returns, depending on the local, social and institutional contexts.

OBJECTIVES

The review assesses the effectiveness of approaches, strategies and interventions focused on women's engagement in agricultural value chains that lead to women's economic empowerment in low- and middle-income countries. It explores the contextual barriers and facilitators that determine women's participation in value chains and ultimately impact their effectiveness.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched completed and on-going studies from Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection (Social Sciences Citation Index [SSCI], Science Citation Index Expanded [SCI-EXPANDED], Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science [CPCI-S], Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Science & Humanities [CPCI-SSH], and Emerging Sources Citation Index [ESCI]), International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, EconLit, Business Source Premier, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane, Database of Systematic Reviews, CAB Abstracts and Sociological Abstracts. We also searched relevant websites such as Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers (CGIAR); the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD); AgriProFocus; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); Donor Committee for Enterprise Development; the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO); the International Labour Organisation (ILO); the Netherlands Development Organisation; USAID; the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation; the International Food Policy Research Institute; World Agroforestry; the International Livestock Research Institute; the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office; the British Library for Development Studies (BLDS); AGRIS; the IMMANA grant database; the 3ie impact evaluation database; Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA); The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL); the World Bank IEG evaluations; the USAID Development Data Library; Experience Clearinghouse; the proceedings of the Agriculture, Nutrition and Health Academy conference; the proceedings of the Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE) Conference; the proceedings of the North East Universities Development Consortium (NEUDC) Conference; and the World Bank Economic Review. The database search was conducted in March 2022, and the website search was completed in August 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The review includes value chain interventions evaluating the economic empowerment outcomes. The review includes effectiveness studies (experimental and non-experimental studies with a comparison group) and process evaluations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, critically appraised the studies, and synthesised findings.

RESULTS

We found that value chain interventions are successful in improving the economic conditions of their intended beneficiaries. The interventions were found to improve women's economic outcomes such as income, assets holdings, productivity, and savings, but these effects were small in size and limited by low confidence in methodological quality. The meta-analysis suggests that this occurs more via the acquisition of skills and improved inputs, rather than through improvement in access to profitable markets. The qualitative evidence on interventions points to the persistence of cultural barriers and other constraints. Those interventions implemented in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia are consistently more successful for all outcomes considered, although there are few studies conducted in other areas of the world.

CONCLUSIONS

The review concludes that value chain interventions empower women, but perhaps to a lesser extent than expected. Economic empowerment does not immediately translate into empowerment within families and communities. Interventions should either moderate their expectations of empowerment goals, or they should be implemented in a way that ensures higher rates of participation among women and the acquisition of greater decision-making power.

摘要

背景

在过去20年里,价值链干预措施在国际发展领域已广泛普及,有必要评估其在多个维度改善妇女福利方面的有效性。农业价值链受到社会文化规范和性别动态的影响,这些因素会对资源分配、利益以及获得机会产生影响。虽然女性在农业中发挥着关键作用,但根据当地的社会和制度背景,她们通常被限制在价值链中价值最低、经济回报最少的环节。

目的

本综述评估了旨在促进低收入和中等收入国家妇女参与农业价值链从而实现妇女经济赋权的方法、策略和干预措施的有效性。它探讨了决定妇女参与价值链并最终影响其有效性的背景障碍和促进因素。

检索方法

我们检索了来自Scopus、科学引文索引核心合集(社会科学引文索引[SSCI]、科学引文索引扩展版[SCI-EXPANDED]、会议论文引文索引 - 科学版[CPCI-S]、会议论文引文索引 - 社会科学与人文科学版[CPCI-SSH]以及新兴资源引文索引[ESCI])、国际社会科学文献目录、EconLit、商业资源全文数据库、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库、考克兰对照试验中心注册库、考克兰系统评价数据库、CAB文摘数据库和社会学文摘数据库中已完成和正在进行的研究。我们还检索了相关网站,如国际农业研究磋商组织(CGIAR);国际农业发展基金(IFAD);农业发展聚焦组织;比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会(BMGF);企业发展捐助委员会;联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO);国际劳工组织(ILO);荷兰发展组织;美国国际开发署(USAID);瑞士发展与合作署;国际粮食政策研究所;世界农林中心;国际家畜研究所;外交、联邦及发展办公室;英国发展研究图书馆(BLDS);AGRIS;IMMANA资助数据库;3ie影响评估数据库;扶贫行动创新组织(IPA);阿卜杜勒·拉蒂夫·贾米尔贫困行动实验室(J-PAL);世界银行独立评估小组评估报告;美国国际开发署发展数据库;经验信息交换中心;农业、营养与健康学会会议论文集;非洲经济研究中心(CSAE)会议论文集;东北大学发展联盟(NEUDC)会议论文集;以及世界银行经济评论。数据库检索于2022年3月进行,网站检索于2022年8月完成。

入选标准

本综述纳入了评估经济赋权成果的价值链干预措施。综述包括有效性研究(有对照组的实验性和非实验性研究)和过程评估。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估研究是否纳入,提取数据,严格评价研究,并综合研究结果。

结果

我们发现价值链干预措施在改善其目标受益人的经济状况方面是成功的。这些干预措施被发现改善了妇女的经济成果,如收入、资产持有量、生产力和储蓄,但这些影响规模较小,且受方法质量的低置信度限制。荟萃分析表明,这种情况更多是通过技能获取和投入改善实现的,而不是通过改善进入盈利市场的机会。关于干预措施的定性证据表明文化障碍和其他限制因素仍然存在。在撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚实施的那些干预措施在所有考虑的成果方面一直更为成功,尽管在世界其他地区进行的研究较少。

结论

综述得出结论,价值链干预措施使妇女获得了赋权,但程度可能比预期的要小。经济赋权并不会立即转化为在家庭和社区中的赋权。干预措施要么适度调整对赋权目标的期望,要么应以确保更高的妇女参与率和获得更大决策权的方式实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/dfbe6a441f0c/CL2-20-e1428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/795bf0f0e42b/CL2-20-e1428-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/cc8df33a5f91/CL2-20-e1428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/c05e8c437578/CL2-20-e1428-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/64cb4109f46e/CL2-20-e1428-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a807d4f00d17/CL2-20-e1428-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/11d842ee8279/CL2-20-e1428-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/f6ede3a32876/CL2-20-e1428-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/3fe6aadc8097/CL2-20-e1428-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/5481256a8bc0/CL2-20-e1428-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/e3f9e9a466bf/CL2-20-e1428-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a3ba1a64818d/CL2-20-e1428-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a85fa49eb3ce/CL2-20-e1428-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a2fb583c38c2/CL2-20-e1428-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/0a8361fdd016/CL2-20-e1428-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/b041042371b9/CL2-20-e1428-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/eec1c869433c/CL2-20-e1428-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/6cd7b5c7dc8b/CL2-20-e1428-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/3bb31a16737d/CL2-20-e1428-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/d8fdf374ad73/CL2-20-e1428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/ac9af7ba5cc9/CL2-20-e1428-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a48f6a314a86/CL2-20-e1428-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/dfbe6a441f0c/CL2-20-e1428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/795bf0f0e42b/CL2-20-e1428-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/cc8df33a5f91/CL2-20-e1428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/c05e8c437578/CL2-20-e1428-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/64cb4109f46e/CL2-20-e1428-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a807d4f00d17/CL2-20-e1428-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/11d842ee8279/CL2-20-e1428-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/f6ede3a32876/CL2-20-e1428-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/3fe6aadc8097/CL2-20-e1428-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/5481256a8bc0/CL2-20-e1428-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/e3f9e9a466bf/CL2-20-e1428-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a3ba1a64818d/CL2-20-e1428-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a85fa49eb3ce/CL2-20-e1428-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a2fb583c38c2/CL2-20-e1428-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/0a8361fdd016/CL2-20-e1428-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/b041042371b9/CL2-20-e1428-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/eec1c869433c/CL2-20-e1428-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/6cd7b5c7dc8b/CL2-20-e1428-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/3bb31a16737d/CL2-20-e1428-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/d8fdf374ad73/CL2-20-e1428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/ac9af7ba5cc9/CL2-20-e1428-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/a48f6a314a86/CL2-20-e1428-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cc8/11317815/dfbe6a441f0c/CL2-20-e1428-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Value chain interventions for improving women's economic empowerment: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.改善妇女经济赋权的价值链干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价与荟萃分析:系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 12;20(3):e1428. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1428. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews.社会保护对低收入和中等收入国家性别平等的影响:一项综述的系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 25;18(2):e1240. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1240. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis.助力行动能力受限的非常年幼儿童参与和积极发展的电动移动干预措施:EMPOWER 证据综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(50):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta24500.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
8
PROTOCOL: Effects of interventions to improve access to financial services for micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map.方案:改善低收入和中等收入国家微型、小型和中型企业金融服务获取情况的干预措施的效果:证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 5;19(3):e1341. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1341. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.农林业干预措施对低收入和中等收入国家农业生产力、生态系统服务及人类福祉的影响:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;17(2):e1167. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1167. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews.循证综合中的人工智能与自动化:对Cochrane、坎贝尔协作组织及环境证据综述所采用方法的调查
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Aug 28;3(5):e70046. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70046. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
PROTOCOL: Value chain interventions for improving women's economic empowerment: A mixed-method systematic review.方案:改善妇女经济赋权的价值链干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 22;19(3):e1331. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1331. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
The power of the collective empowers women: Evidence from self-help groups in India.集体的力量赋予女性力量:来自印度自助团体的证据。
World Dev. 2021 Oct;146:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105579.
3
Understanding female and male empowerment in Burkina Faso using the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI): a longitudinal study.
利用项目层面的农业妇女赋权指数(pro-WEAI)了解布基纳法索的女性和男性赋权:一项纵向研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01371-9.
4
Adoption of soil and water conservation technology and its effect on the productivity of smallholder rice farmers in Southwest Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部水土保持技术的采用及其对小农户水稻生产力的影响。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 15;7(3):e06433. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06433. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
The impact of self-help groups on pastoral women's empowerment and agency: A study in Nigeria.自助团体对牧区妇女赋权及能动性的影响:尼日利亚的一项研究。
Pastoralism. 2017;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13570-017-0101-5. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
Can women's self-help groups improve access to information, decision-making, and agricultural practices? The Indian case.妇女自助团体能否改善信息获取、决策制定和农业实践?以印度为例。
Agric Econ. 2019 Sep;50(5):567-580. doi: 10.1111/agec.12510. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Combined structural interventions for gender equality and livelihood security: a critical review of the evidence from southern and eastern Africa and the implications for young people.促进性别平等和生计安全的综合结构干预措施:对南部和东部非洲证据的批判性回顾及其对年轻人的影响。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2012 Jun 14;15 Suppl 1(3Suppl 1):1-10. doi: 10.7448/IAS.15.3.17362.