Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Center for Healthy Aging, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Sep 1;79(9). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae192.
To enhance the precision of measuring, analyzing, and forecasting care needs for older adults with physical and/or mental disabilities, we developed the Physical Disability Index (PDI) and Mental Disability Index (MDI). Furthermore, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the PDI and MDI. Additionally, we investigate their associations with falls to further indicate the predictive validity.
A total of 11 621 older adults (53.1% women; mean age = 83.2; SD = 10.8) from 23 provinces in China were investigated in 2017-2018 to assess the reliability and validity of the PDI and MDI among older adults aged 65 to 105. Among which, 6 071 older adults with both baseline (2017-2018) and follow-up (2021) data were included in analyses to evaluate associations between the baseline health status determined by PDI and MDI and the number and severity of falls at baseline and follow-up. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency. The convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity and concurrent validity were assessed. Multinomial logistic regression models were utilized to assess associations.
We found satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.70) of the PDI and MDI in the total sample and sex-specific subgroups. Our results support the convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity, and concurrent validity of the PDI and MDI. We also found baseline physical disability and comorbid physical and mental disability are associated with a higher risk of baseline and follow-up falls.
The PDI and MDI are reliable and valid instruments to assess physical and mental disability status among older adults, respectively.
为了提高测量、分析和预测身体和/或精神残疾的老年人护理需求的准确性,我们开发了身体残疾指数(PDI)和精神残疾指数(MDI)。此外,我们评估了 PDI 和 MDI 的可靠性和有效性。此外,我们还研究了它们与跌倒的关联,以进一步表明预测的有效性。
我们于 2017-2018 年调查了来自中国 23 个省的 11621 名年龄在 65 至 105 岁的老年人(53.1%为女性;平均年龄 83.2 岁,标准差 10.8 岁),以评估 PDI 和 MDI 在老年人中的可靠性和有效性。其中,有 6071 名老年人具有基线(2017-2018 年)和随访(2021 年)数据,用于评估基线 PDI 和 MDI 确定的健康状况与基线和随访时跌倒的次数和严重程度之间的关系。我们使用克朗巴赫 α 来确定内部一致性。评估了收敛和发散有效性、已知组有效性和同时有效性。我们使用多项逻辑回归模型来评估关联。
我们发现 PDI 和 MDI 在总样本和性别特异性亚组中的内部一致性(克朗巴赫 α≥0.70)令人满意。我们的结果支持 PDI 和 MDI 的收敛和发散有效性、已知组有效性和同时有效性。我们还发现基线身体残疾和合并的身体和精神残疾与基线和随访时跌倒的风险增加相关。
PDI 和 MDI 是可靠和有效的工具,可分别评估老年人的身体和精神残疾状况。