• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国某农村地区老年人中,通过改良的世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQoL-BREF)测量的特定领域生活质量的性别差异及其相关因素。

Gender difference in domain-specific quality of life measured by modified WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire and their associated factors among older adults in a rural district in Bangladesh.

作者信息

Islam Fakir M Amirul

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.

Organisation for Rural Community Development (ORCD), Dariapur, Narail, Bangladesh.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0317113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317113. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317113
PMID:39775741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706451/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global population of older adults has steadily increased in recent decades. Little is known about the gender difference in the quality of life (QoL) of older adults in the general population. This study aimed to identify factors associated with QoL among older adults by gender.

METHOD

Data on QoL using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-BREF) questionnaire and socio-demographic characteristics, including living status and sources of income, were collected from 1147 older adults. The WHOQoL-BREF has four domains: physical, psychological, social and environmental. Rasch analysis was used to compute a combined score from Likert-type data to a continuous scale ranging from 0% satisfaction to 100% satisfaction in terms of QoL for each domain. We used a generalized linear model to compare the mean rate of QoL for different factors, and logistic regression analysis was used to quantify the associations of factors with below-average QoL measured as 50% or less in QoL.

RESULTS

The domain-specific QoL mean (standard error), minimum-maximum values were physical 48.9 (0.41), 7-86, psychological 38.9 (0.51), 4-71, social 50.5 (0.49), 8-92, and environmental domains 47.8 (0.37), 6-91 in the total sample with significant gender difference in all but social domain. The proportion of below average QoL for females vs. males was physical 47.6% vs. 42.6%, psychological 74.4% vs.66.7%; social 34.8% vs. 30.1% and environmental domains 56.1% vs. 49.0%. In females, participants living alone were associated with a higher proportion of below average QoL in physical OR 30.2, 95% CI 2.47, 370, psychological OR 9.54, 95% CI1.09,83.27 and social domains OR 5.94, 95% CI 1.25,28.34. In males, participants' sources of income from relatives were associated with a higher proportion of below average QoL in physical OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.01,6.44, psychological 30.2, 95% CI 2.47, 370, psychological OR 4.63 95% CI 2.56, 8.38, social domains OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.04, 3.16 and environmental domains OR 2.53 95% CI 1.44, 4.43 than those who had own income. Females engaged in income generation activities had better QoL in social and environmental domains than those with house duties, irrespective of their education or socioeconomic status. Males in retired life had the highest QoL in the social and environmental domains if they had better SES.

CONCLUSIONS

The study's findings reveal that more than 50% of people had below-average QoL in each domain, which is significant. The study also highlighted that females living alone and males without their own income had the poorest QoL. On a positive note, it was found that females engaged in any income generation activities had better QoL in social and environmental domains. These results provide valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals. They underscore the importance of implementing appropriate intervention programs to enhance the QoL of older adults, reiterating the urgency and necessity of their work to improve the health and well-being of older adults.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/9ba8585d5411/pone.0317113.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/cca358dbafd1/pone.0317113.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/42fe2908b0fc/pone.0317113.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/51c70aa8badd/pone.0317113.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/97c3f0bb250a/pone.0317113.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/85fdb6dbb5e2/pone.0317113.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/3a3f10582864/pone.0317113.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/86f91a93a190/pone.0317113.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/cb1dd40dbcb6/pone.0317113.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/8e2dc5c83910/pone.0317113.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/11e078308a50/pone.0317113.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/18482fbb0400/pone.0317113.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/69c6d8cd3ea4/pone.0317113.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/25d7c955d7b8/pone.0317113.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/9ba8585d5411/pone.0317113.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/cca358dbafd1/pone.0317113.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/42fe2908b0fc/pone.0317113.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/51c70aa8badd/pone.0317113.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/97c3f0bb250a/pone.0317113.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/85fdb6dbb5e2/pone.0317113.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/3a3f10582864/pone.0317113.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/86f91a93a190/pone.0317113.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/cb1dd40dbcb6/pone.0317113.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/8e2dc5c83910/pone.0317113.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/11e078308a50/pone.0317113.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/18482fbb0400/pone.0317113.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/69c6d8cd3ea4/pone.0317113.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/25d7c955d7b8/pone.0317113.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a96b/11706451/9ba8585d5411/pone.0317113.g014.jpg
摘要

背景

近几十年来,全球老年人口稳步增长。对于一般人群中老年人生活质量(QoL)的性别差异知之甚少。本研究旨在按性别确定与老年人生活质量相关的因素。

方法

使用世界卫生组织生活质量(WHOQoL-BREF)问卷收集了1147名老年人的生活质量数据以及社会人口学特征,包括生活状况和收入来源。WHOQoL-BREF有四个领域:身体、心理、社会和环境。采用拉施分析将李克特式数据计算为一个综合分数,以得出每个领域生活质量从0%满意度到100%满意度的连续量表。我们使用广义线性模型比较不同因素的生活质量平均率,并使用逻辑回归分析量化因素与生活质量低于平均水平(以生活质量50%及以下衡量)之间的关联。

结果

在总样本中,特定领域的生活质量均值(标准误差)、最小值 - 最大值分别为:身体领域48.9(0.41),7 - 86;心理领域38.9(0.51),4 - 71;社会领域50.5(0.49),8 - 92;环境领域47.8(0.37),6 - 91,除社会领域外,所有领域均存在显著性别差异。女性与男性生活质量低于平均水平的比例分别为:身体领域47.6%对42.6%,心理领域74.4%对66.7%;社会领域34.8%对30.1%,环境领域56.1%对49.0%。在女性中,独居参与者在身体领域(比值比30.2,95%置信区间2.47,370)、心理领域(比值比9.54,95%置信区间1.09,83.27)和社会领域(比值比5.94,95%置信区间1.25,28.34)生活质量低于平均水平的比例更高。在男性中,来自亲属的收入来源与身体领域(比值比3.6,95%置信区间2.01,6.44)、心理领域(比值比4.63,95%置信区间2.56,8.38)、社会领域(比值比1.81,95%置信区间1.04,3.16)和环境领域(比值比2.53,95%置信区间1.44,4.43)生活质量低于平均水平的比例高于有自己收入的男性。无论教育程度或社会经济地位如何,从事创收活动的女性在社会和环境领域的生活质量均优于承担家务的女性。退休男性如果社会经济地位较好,则在社会和环境领域的生活质量最高。

结论

研究结果表明,超过50%的人在每个领域的生活质量低于平均水平,这一情况值得关注。该研究还强调,独居女性和没有自己收入的男性生活质量最差。积极的一面是,发现从事任何创收活动的女性在社会和环境领域的生活质量更好。这些结果为政策制定者和医疗保健专业人员提供了有价值的见解。它们强调了实施适当干预计划以提高老年人生活质量的重要性,重申了他们为改善老年人健康和福祉而开展工作的紧迫性和必要性。

相似文献

1
Gender difference in domain-specific quality of life measured by modified WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire and their associated factors among older adults in a rural district in Bangladesh.孟加拉国某农村地区老年人中,通过改良的世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQoL-BREF)测量的特定领域生活质量的性别差异及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0317113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317113. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the modified 19-item Bengali version of WHOQOL scale using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh.拉希分析对经改良的 19 项孟加拉语版世界卫生组织生活质量量表的心理测量学评估:孟加拉国一个农村地区的横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 1;8(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00411-7.
3
Quality of life of COVID-19 recovered patients: a 1-year follow-up study from Bangladesh.新冠康复患者的生活质量:来自孟加拉国的一项为期 1 年的随访研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2023 Aug 25;12(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01125-9.
4
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for use in a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh: an application of Rasch analysis.用于孟加拉国一个农村地区横断面研究的访谈式世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)问卷的心理测量学评估:拉施分析的应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4026-0.
5
Assessing the quality of life among Pakistani general population and their associated factors by using the World Health Organization's quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF): a population based cross-sectional study.采用世界卫生组织生活质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF)评估巴基斯坦普通人群的生活质量及其相关因素:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1065-x.
6
Assessing quality of life using WHOQOL-BREF: a cross-sectional study on the association between quality of life and neighborhood environmental satisfaction, and the mediating effect of health-related behaviors.采用 WHOQOL-BREF 评估生活质量:一项关于生活质量与邻里环境满意度之间关系的横断面研究,以及健康相关行为的中介作用。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5942-3.
7
Assessment of quality of life and its determinants in type-2 diabetes patients using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument in Bangladesh.采用世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)评估孟加拉国 2 型糖尿病患者的生活质量及其决定因素。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01072-w.
8
Levels of depressive symptoms may modify the relationship between the WHOQOL-BREF and its determining factors in community-dwelling older adults.抑郁症状水平可能会改变世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)与其在社区居住的老年人中的决定因素之间的关系。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Apr;28(4):591-601. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215002276. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Quality of life of COVID-19 recovered patients in Bangladesh.孟加拉国 COVID-19 康复患者的生活质量。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0257421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257421. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychological distress and its association with socio-demographic factors in a rural district in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.孟加拉国一个农村地区的心理困扰及其与社会人口因素的关联:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0212765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212765. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of health-related quality of Life for COVID-19 survivors living in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A repeated Follow-Up after 18 months of their recovery.孟加拉国达卡地区新冠肺炎康复者健康相关生活质量的预测因素:康复18个月后的重复随访
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;4(8):e0003472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003472. eCollection 2024.
2
Better and Healthier Together? The Mediation Effect of Positive Psychological Capital on the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Older Adults.携手迈向更美好、更健康?积极心理资本对老年人感知社会支持与健康相关生活质量关系的中介作用
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2025 Jun;100(4):502-526. doi: 10.1177/00914150241268178. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
Quality of life of stroke survivors in Bangladesh.
孟加拉国中风幸存者的生活质量。
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Nov 8;11:20503121231208604. doi: 10.1177/20503121231208604. eCollection 2023.
4
Neighborhood environment and quality of life of older adults in eastern Nepal: findings from a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔东部老年人群的邻里环境与生活质量:一项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05278-6.
5
The impact of comorbidity on the quality of life of people who recovered from COVID-19 in Bangladesh.共病对孟加拉国新冠肺炎康复者生活质量的影响。
IJID Reg. 2024 Mar 16;11:100351. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.03.006. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Economic well-being induced Women's empowerment: Evidence from coastal fishing communities of Bangladesh.经济福祉促进了妇女赋权:来自孟加拉国沿海渔业社区的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 29;10(7):e28743. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28743. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
7
Quality of life of COVID-19 recovered patients: a 1-year follow-up study from Bangladesh.新冠康复患者的生活质量:来自孟加拉国的一项为期 1 年的随访研究。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2023 Aug 25;12(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01125-9.
8
An assessment of disability and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury upon discharge from a Bangladesh rehabilitation unit.对孟加拉国一家康复机构出院的脊髓损伤患者的残疾状况和生活质量评估。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Jan;61(1):37-42. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00852-4. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
9
Assessment of quality of life and its determinants in type-2 diabetes patients using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument in Bangladesh.采用世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)评估孟加拉国 2 型糖尿病患者的生活质量及其决定因素。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01072-w.
10
Quality of life (QoL) among COVID-19 recovered healthcare workers in Bangladesh.孟加拉国 COVID-19 康复医护人员的生活质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 30;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07961-z.