Loren Yavelberg, Norman Gledhill, Veronica Jamnik
York University, 4700 Keele Street, Room 358, Bethune College, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug 13;16(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00959-6.
Time-restricted feeding (TRF) is a dietary pattern that alternates between periods of fasting and feeding, which has gained significant attention in recent years. The 16/8 approach consists of fasting for 16 h and feeding for an 8-h window, while the 12/12 method consists of fasting for 12 h and a 12-h feeding window. Limited research exists comparing the effects of these methods coupled with physical activity (PA). The aim of this investigation was to examine the acute effects between conditions of varying TRF durations (12 and 16 h) and PA intensities on the fat oxidation rate (FOR). It was hypothesized that i) the TRF16 conditions would exhibit higher FOR and that PA would enhance these effects, and ii) High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) would result in greater effects on FOR compared to Low-Moderate Intensity Steady State Continuous Training (MICT) PA.
Eighteen young adults (age: 23 ± 2.0 yrs., body mass index: 23.5 ± 2.8 kg·m) were recruited and participated in the supervised intervention. The discrete component open circuit spirometry system was used to measure oxygen consumption (VO), and Frayne's equation was used to determine the FOR plus FOR. ANOVA was used to determine pre/post-intervention differences in FOR The FORmax for the TRF16 + HIIT intervention was significantly higher than the TRF12 (mean difference = 0.099 g·min-1, p = 0.011, 95% CI 0.017 to 0.180) and TRF16 fast alone (mean difference = 0.093 g·min-1, p = 0.002, 95% CI 0.027 to 0.159). The FOR for TRF12 + HIIT intervention was significantly higher than the TRF12 fast alone (mean difference = 0.070 g·min, p = 0.023, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.134). The TRF16 + HIIT intervention was also significantly higher than the TRF12 fast alone (mean difference = 0.099 g·min, p = 0.011, 95% CI 0.017 to 0.180).
This study contributes to the ever-growing body of literature on the acute effects of TRF and PA on young adult males and females. The findings suggest that the TRF16 + HIIT PA intervention results in the highest FOR.
Retrospective Registration ISRCTN # 10076373 (October 6, 2023).
限时进食(TRF)是一种在禁食和进食阶段之间交替的饮食模式,近年来受到了广泛关注。16/8模式包括禁食16小时和在8小时的时间段内进食,而12/12模式则是禁食12小时和12小时的进食时间段。比较这些方法与体育活动(PA)效果的研究有限。本研究的目的是探讨不同TRF持续时间(12小时和16小时)和PA强度条件对脂肪氧化率(FOR)的急性影响。研究假设如下:i)TRF16条件下的FOR会更高,且PA会增强这些效果;ii)与低-中等强度稳态连续训练(MICT)PA相比,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对FOR的影响更大。
招募了18名年轻成年人(年龄:23±2.0岁,体重指数:23.5±2.8kg·m)并参与了有监督的干预。使用离散成分开路肺量计系统测量耗氧量(VO),并使用Frayne方程确定FOR加FOR。方差分析用于确定干预前后FOR的差异。TRF16+HIIT干预的最大FOR显著高于TRF12(平均差异=0.099g·min-1,p=0.011,95%CI为0.017至0.180)和单独的TRF16禁食(平均差异=0.093g·min-1,p=0.00,2,95%CI为0.027至0.159)。TRF12+HIIT干预的FOR显著高于单独的TRF12禁食(平均差异=0.070g·min,p=0.023,95%CI为0.007至0.134)。TRF16+HIIT干预也显著高于单独的TRF12禁食(平均差异=0.099g·min,p=0.011,95%CI为0.017至0.180)。
本研究为关于TRF和PA对年轻成年男性和女性急性影响的不断增长的文献做出了贡献。研究结果表明,TRF16+HIIT PA干预导致最高的FOR。
回顾性注册ISRCTN # 10076373(2023年10月6日)。