The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.
Athens Speech Language and Swallowing Institute, Athens, Greece.
J Voice. 2020 Nov;34(6):918-929. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 31.
To give, if possible, an answer in the long-standing debate of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) through published systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from 1984, the year the term LPR first appeared in the literature, until October 2018. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing the treatment response of PPI therapy in patients with LPR were included in our study.
Nine eligible studies, two systematic reviews and seven meta-analyses, were identified and analyzed in our study. Three of these were published in 2006, one in 2007, one in 2013, and four in 2016. Five studies published before 2016 and one in 2016 showed no benefit from PPI therapy for LPR patients while the three remaining meta-analyses of 2016 showed a significant improvement in LPR symptoms but no significant difference in response rate and reflux finding scores (RFS) between PPI therapy and placebo treatment.
Based on the existing data, the use of PPI therapy for the treatment of LPR remains questionable. Six out of the nine systematic reviews/meta-analyses concluded that PPI therapy is not superior to placebo and three concluded that PPI therapy significantly improved LPR symptoms although they did not identify any difference in the post-treatment laryngoscopic findings. There is still a long way to go until we can give a definite answer to this question but in the meantime, the use of PPI therapy for the treatment of LPR will continue even though existing evidence is poor and weak, coming mainly from individual uncontrolled studies.
通过已发表的系统评价和荟萃分析,为质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)治疗咽喉反流(LPR)疗效的长期争论提供可能的答案。
从 1984 年(LPR 首次出现在文献中的年份)到 2018 年 10 月,我们在 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 中进行了检索。我们的研究纳入了比较 LPR 患者 PPI 治疗反应的系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们的研究确定并分析了 9 项符合条件的研究,其中 2 项为系统评价,7 项为荟萃分析。其中 3 项发表于 2006 年,1 项发表于 2007 年,1 项发表于 2013 年,4 项发表于 2016 年。5 项发表于 2016 年之前的研究和 1 项发表于 2016 年的研究表明,PPI 治疗对 LPR 患者无益,而 2016 年的 3 项荟萃分析则显示 LPR 症状有显著改善,但 PPI 治疗与安慰剂治疗的反应率和反流发现评分(RFS)无显著差异。
根据现有数据,PPIs 治疗 LPR 的疗效仍存在疑问。9 项系统评价/荟萃分析中有 6 项得出结论,PPI 治疗并不优于安慰剂,有 3 项结论表明 PPI 治疗显著改善了 LPR 症状,但未发现治疗后喉镜检查结果有任何差异。要对这个问题给出明确的答案,还有很长的路要走,但在此期间,尽管现有证据质量较差且薄弱(主要来自于个别非对照研究),PPIs 治疗 LPR 的应用仍将继续。