Taylor Harry Owen, Chen Yu-Chih, Tsuchiya Kazumi, Cudjoe Thomas K M, Qin Weidi, Nguyen Ann W, Roy Arka
Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Innov Aging. 2024 Jul 19;8(8):igae068. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae068. eCollection 2024.
Loneliness is a major public health concern; however, limited research has examined the mechanisms contributing to racial/ethnic inequities in loneliness. Race/ethnicity has been hypothesized to be a distal factor influencing loneliness, and racial/ethnic inequities in loneliness may be attributable to socioeconomic factors (e.g., income and education). Our study seeks to confirm these hypotheses by examining mechanisms that contribute to racial/ethnic inequities in loneliness. In other words, if racial/ethnic differences in loneliness among older adults are mediated by income and education.
Data came from the Health and Retirement Study Leave-Behind Questionnaire, 2014-2016. Loneliness was measured by the UCLA 3-item loneliness scale. Race/ethnicity categories were White, Black, and Hispanic/Latino. The mediator variables were household income and education. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine differences in loneliness by race/ethnicity. The Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) mediation method was used to determine if income and education mediated racial/ethnic differences in loneliness.
In models examining income and education together, a complete mediation was found between White and Black older adults, in that income and education completely mediated differences in loneliness between these groups. A partial mediation was found between White and Hispanic, and Black and Hispanic older adults. When examining income and education separately, we found that income solely accounted for racial/ethnic differences in loneliness compared to education.
Our study is the first to explicitly determine if socioeconomic factors mediate race/ethnicity differences in loneliness among a national sample of older adults. These findings illustrate that income may have greater proximate effects for loneliness among older adults in comparison to education. Additionally, these findings can inform evidence-based interventions to reduce loneliness among older adults. Interventions that enhance quality of life and provide opportunities for socialization for racialized low-income older adults may help decrease racial/ethnic inequities in loneliness.
孤独是一个重大的公共卫生问题;然而,针对导致孤独方面种族/民族不平等的机制的研究有限。种族/民族被假定为影响孤独感的一个远端因素,而孤独方面的种族/民族不平等可能归因于社会经济因素(如收入和教育)。我们的研究旨在通过探究导致孤独方面种族/民族不平等的机制来证实这些假设。换句话说,即老年人孤独感方面的种族/民族差异是否由收入和教育所介导。
数据来自2014 - 2016年健康与退休研究遗留问卷。孤独感通过加州大学洛杉矶分校3项孤独感量表进行测量。种族/民族类别包括白人、黑人以及西班牙裔/拉丁裔。中介变量为家庭收入和教育程度。使用多变量线性回归模型来确定不同种族/民族在孤独感上的差异。采用卡尔森 - 霍尔姆 - 布林(KHB)中介方法来确定收入和教育是否介导了孤独感方面的种族/民族差异。
在同时考察收入和教育的模型中,发现白人及黑人老年人之间存在完全中介效应,即收入和教育完全介导了这两组人群在孤独感上的差异。在白人及西班牙裔、黑人和西班牙裔老年人之间发现了部分中介效应。当分别考察收入和教育时,我们发现与教育相比,收入单独解释了孤独感方面的种族/民族差异。
我们的研究首次明确确定社会经济因素是否介导了全国范围内老年人群体孤独感方面的种族/民族差异。这些发现表明,与教育相比,收入可能对老年人的孤独感有更大的直接影响。此外,这些发现可为减少老年人孤独感的循证干预措施提供参考。提高生活质量并为种族化的低收入老年人提供社交机会的干预措施可能有助于减少孤独感方面的种族/民族不平等。