Manoharan Kaviya, Jinson Juanna, Ramesh Kalaivani, George Melvin
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Perspect Clin Res. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):128-133. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_179_23. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
Although the Americas and Europe have historically dominated the global research landscape, emerging economies - Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) have significantly increased their contributions in recent years. This article studies clinical trial trends in the BRICS nations between 2018 and 2022 and compares it with trends in the G7 nations (comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, the USA, and the European Union). This will help stakeholders in planning drug development strategies.
Data were collected from the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and the World Bank database. An electronic search was done for the total number of trials registered between January 1, 2018, and March 15, 2023. Information was analyzed based on the year of registration, therapeutic area, type of intervention, sponsorship, and type of special population. The trial density indices (TDIs) were calculated based on population (Xi) and gross domestic product (GDP) (Yi) using author-derived formulae.
Altogether 2, 77, 536 trials from the BRICS and G7 were registered. China and the US had the most trials among the BRICS and G7, respectively. Between 2018 and 2022, the gap between the BRICS and G7 steadily reduced. The most common indication for clinical trials among the BRICS was cancer. Based on population, the TDI was the highest in China and the lowest in Russia. In proportion to the GDP, the TDI was maximum in Russia and minimum in India.
There is a remarkable reduction in the gap in clinical trial trends between the BRICS and G7 nations. Among the BRICS, India and China are at the forefront in drug development. There is scope for improvement in trial density based on India's population and GDP. Stakeholders are likely to utilize the strengths of the BRICS as an attractive destination for investment in this area.
尽管美洲和欧洲在历史上主导着全球研究格局,但新兴经济体——巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非(金砖国家)近年来的贡献显著增加。本文研究了2018年至2022年金砖国家的临床试验趋势,并将其与七国集团(由加拿大、法国、德国、意大利、日本、英国、美国和欧盟组成)的趋势进行比较。这将有助于利益相关者规划药物开发战略。
数据收集自世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)和世界银行数据库。对2018年1月1日至2023年3月15日期间注册的试验总数进行了电子检索。根据注册年份、治疗领域、干预类型、赞助情况和特殊人群类型对信息进行了分析。使用作者推导的公式,根据人口(Xi)和国内生产总值(GDP)(Yi)计算试验密度指数(TDI)。
金砖国家和七国集团共注册了277536项试验。中国和美国分别在金砖国家和七国集团中拥有最多的试验。2018年至2022年期间,金砖国家和七国集团之间的差距稳步缩小。金砖国家中最常见的临床试验适应症是癌症。基于人口,中国的TDI最高,俄罗斯最低。与GDP成比例,俄罗斯的TDI最高,印度最低。
金砖国家和七国集团之间的临床试验趋势差距显著缩小。在金砖国家中,印度和中国在药物开发方面处于领先地位。基于印度的人口和GDP,试验密度仍有提升空间。利益相关者可能会利用金砖国家的优势,将其作为该领域有吸引力的投资目的地。