Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 May 12;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03269-w.
Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged in recent years as a possible treatment for hypertension. The first sham-controlled trial showed a small magnitude and non-significant in the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, also due to a substantial decrease of BP in sham arm. Considering this, we aimed to quantify the magnitude of BP decrease within the sham arm of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with RDN in patients with hypertension.
Electronic databases were searched since inception until January 2022 for randomized sham-controlled trials which assessed the efficacy in lowering BP of the sham intervention for catheter-based RDN in adult patients with hypertension. The outcomes were change in ambulatory/office systolic and diastolic BP.
A total of 9 RCT were included in the analysis enrolling a total of 674 patients. Sham intervention showed a decrease in all evaluated outcomes. Office systolic BP had a reduction of -5.52 mmHg [95%CI -7.91, -3.13] and office diastolic BP of -2.13 mmHg [95%CI -3.08, -1.17]. Sham procedure for RDN also showed a reduction of -3.41 mmHg [95%CI -5.08, -1.75] in ambulatory systolic BP and - 2.44 mmHg [95%CI -3.31, -1.57] in ambulatory diastolic BP.
Despite recent data indicating that RDN might be an effective treatment for patients with resistant hypertension when compared to a sham intervention, our results indicate that the sham intervention for RDN also has a significant effect on lowering Office and Ambulatory (24-h) Blood Pressure in adult patients with hypertension. This highlights that BP itself might be sensitive to placebo-like effect and also brings further difficulties in establishing the BP lowering efficacy of invasive interventions due to the magnitude of the sham effect.
近年来,肾去神经术(RDN)作为治疗高血压的一种可能方法出现。第一项假手术对照试验显示,血压(BP)降低的幅度较小且无统计学意义,这也归因于假手术组 BP 大幅下降。考虑到这一点,我们旨在量化高血压患者 RDN 假手术对照随机临床试验(RCT)中假手术组的 BP 降低幅度。
从成立之初到 2022 年 1 月,我们在电子数据库中搜索了评估导管 RDN 假手术干预对高血压成年患者降压疗效的随机假手术对照试验。结局为动态/诊室收缩压和舒张压的变化。
共有 9 项 RCT 纳入了 674 例患者的分析。假手术干预显示所有评估结局均有下降。诊室收缩压降低 5.52mmHg[95%CI-7.91,-3.13],诊室舒张压降低 2.13mmHg[95%CI-3.08,-1.17]。RDN 的假手术程序还使动态收缩压降低 3.41mmHg[95%CI-5.08,-1.75],动态舒张压降低-2.44mmHg[95%CI-3.31,-1.57]。
尽管最近的数据表明,与假手术相比,RDN 可能是治疗耐药性高血压患者的有效治疗方法,但我们的结果表明,RDN 的假手术干预也对降低高血压成年患者的诊室和动态(24 小时)血压有显著影响。这突出表明 BP 本身可能对安慰剂样效应敏感,并且由于假手术效应的幅度,进一步增加了确立侵入性干预降低 BP 疗效的难度。