Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2024 Dec;46(6):1044-1051. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14354. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
We aimed to develop an automated, low-volume method for thrombocyte counting in capillary blood using the Sysmex predilution (PD) mode.
Microsamples were prepared by resuspension of 50 μL blood in 300 μL DCL CellPack. Thrombocyte counting was done in the impedance (PLT-I) and fluorescence (PLT-F) channels. The imprecision and bias was evaluated in >394 microsamples from adult blood. Preanalytical factors (skin-piercing, storage, and transportation in our pneumatic tube system) was assessed, and studies on pediatric microsamples were made for comparison. The improvement in analytical quality and turnaround time was examined.
For PLT-F, the imprecision was 1.1%-3.7%, and the bias was 10.1% (95% CI: 8.8-11.3). After skin-piercing, the bias was 8.1% (95% CI: 5.6-10.6) and the imprecision 1.9% (95% CI: 1.3-2.5). Thrombocyte counts kept stable after 4 h at room temperature (94.8% [95% CI: 93.2-96.4]) and after pneumatic tube transportation [6.7% (95% CI: 4.8-8.6)]. The bias of the PD mode for pediatric microsamples was 13.0% (95% CI: -8.4-34.4) in the PLT-F channel. The automated method had a considerably lower imprecision than the existing manual thrombocyte counting method and reduced turnaround times.
The automated microsample method offers a low-volume alternative for measurement of thrombocytes. The method appears useful also in pediatric samples.
我们旨在开发一种自动化、低体积的毛细血管全血血小板计数方法,使用希森美康预稀释(PD)模式。
通过将 50μL 血液重悬于 300μL DCL CellPack 中制备微样本。在阻抗(PLT-I)和荧光(PLT-F)通道中进行血小板计数。在 >394 份成人血液微样本中评估了不精密度和偏差。评估了预分析因素(皮肤穿刺、储存和在我们的气动管系统中的运输),并进行了儿科微样本的研究以进行比较。检查了分析质量和周转时间的改进。
对于 PLT-F,不精密度为 1.1%-3.7%,偏差为 10.1%(95%CI:8.8-11.3)。皮肤穿刺后,偏差为 8.1%(95%CI:5.6-10.6),不精密度为 1.9%(95%CI:1.3-2.5)。血小板计数在室温下放置 4 小时后保持稳定(94.8%[95%CI:93.2-96.4]),并且在气动管运输后保持稳定[6.7%(95%CI:4.8-8.6)]。在 PLT-F 通道中,儿科微样本的 PD 模式的偏差为 13.0%(95%CI:-8.4-34.4)。与现有的手动血小板计数方法相比,自动化方法具有更低的不精密度,并且缩短了周转时间。
自动化微样本方法为血小板测量提供了一种低体积的替代方法。该方法在儿科样本中似乎也有用。