Department of Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 1;72(Suppl 5):S809-S815. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3194_23. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
In individuals aged >50 years, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) show good efficacy and similar incidences of systemic adverse events (SAEs). However, comparative studies between agents are limited. Our study aimed to compare the real-world SAE risks of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept users.
This retrospective cohort study identified new bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept users in a multi-institutional database in Taiwan between 2014 and 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) with propensity scores was conducted to achieve homogeneity among groups. The Fine and Gray model was utilized to estimate the subdistribution hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval.
This study included 701 bevacizumab, 463 ranibizumab, and 984 aflibercept users. After IPTW, all covariates were well-balanced. All three anti-VEGF agents had a low and comparable number per 100 person-years of major adverse cardiac events, heart failure, thromboembolic events, major bleeding, all-cause admission, and all-cause death (all P > 0.05). No significant differences in long-term change of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and alanine transaminase (all P for interaction > 0.05) were observed among groups.
Bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept had a good systemic safety profile in this study. All groups showed a low and similar SAE risk and no differences in their long-term change of laboratory data. Therefore, these anti-VEGF agents could be prescribed safely to patients with AMD.
在年龄>50 岁的个体中,年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是导致不可逆性失明的主要原因。血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)拮抗剂(贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普)的玻璃体内注射显示出良好的疗效和相似的全身不良事件(SAE)发生率。然而,关于这些药物的比较研究有限。本研究旨在比较贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普使用者的真实世界 SAE 风险。
本回顾性队列研究在台湾的一个多机构数据库中,于 2014 年至 2019 年期间,确定了新的贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普使用者。采用倾向评分逆概率治疗权重(IPTW)进行治疗,以实现组间的同质性。采用 Fine 和 Gray 模型估计亚分布风险比和 95%置信区间。
本研究共纳入 701 例贝伐单抗、463 例雷珠单抗和 984 例阿柏西普使用者。经过 IPTW,所有协变量均得到很好的平衡。所有三种抗 VEGF 药物的每 100 人年的主要不良心脏事件、心力衰竭、血栓栓塞事件、大出血、全因入院和全因死亡的发生率均较低且相似(均 P >0.05)。各组间长期的收缩压和舒张压、低密度脂蛋白、估算肾小球滤过率和丙氨酸氨基转移酶变化无显著差异(所有 P 交互值>0.05)。
在本研究中,贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普具有良好的全身安全性。所有组的 SAE 风险均较低且相似,且实验室数据的长期变化无差异。因此,这些抗 VEGF 药物可安全地用于 AMD 患者。