Ngo Ntjam Nadège, Thulliez Marie, Paintaud Gilles, Salvo Francesco, Angoulvant Denis, Pisella Pierre-Jean, Bejan-Angoulvant Theodora
Hospital Pharmacy, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
EA 4245, T2I (Transplantation, Immunity & Inflammation), Université de Tours, Tours, France.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 15;139(6):1-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0640.
Systemic safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is a matter of debate and regular updates are necessary.
To evaluate systemic adverse events (SAEs) associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs compared with non-anti-VEGF treatments in patients with ocular diseases.
Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to July 7, 2020.
Randomized clinical trials conducted in adults with retinal diseases who received intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.
Studies and treatment characteristics and outcome data were extracted and analyzed, and study quality was evaluated.
Main outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and total mortality. Secondary outcomes included nonocular hemorrhage, components of MACEs, other cardiovascular outcomes, serious SAEs, and all SAEs.
A total of 74 randomized clinical trials were analyzed: 32 trials (43%) included 14 190 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 24 (32%) included 5424 patients with diabetic retinopathy (diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy), 17 trials (23%) included 3757 patients with retinal vein occlusion, and 1 trial (1%) included 122 patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization. Anti-VEGF drug administration did not increase MACEs compared with control agents (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.85-1.58) or total mortality (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.82-1.96). There was an interaction (subgroup difference, P = .04) in mortality risk depending on the underlying disease with an increase (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.03-3.16; P = .04) in the risk of death in patients with diabetic retinopathy; however, no increase was observed in patients with AMD or retinal vein occlusion. Administration of anti-VEGF drugs increased the risk of nonocular hemorrhage (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.01-2.10), mainly in patients with AMD.
Intravitreal anti-VEGF was not associated with an increase in MACEs in the trials examined herein. Increased mortality in patients with diabetes and nonocular hemorrhages, especially in those with AMD, could represent a safety signal, but the evidence was not strong. However, continued surveillance of SAEs remains warranted.
玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)的全身安全性存在争议,定期更新很有必要。
评估与非抗VEGF治疗相比,玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物治疗眼病患者时的全身不良事件(SAE)。
对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库数据库从创建至2020年7月7日进行电子检索。
在患有视网膜疾病的成人中进行的随机临床试验,这些患者接受玻璃体内抗VEGF药物治疗。
提取并分析研究、治疗特征及结果数据,评估研究质量。
主要结局为主要心血管事件(MACE)和总死亡率。次要结局包括非眼部出血、MACE的组成部分、其他心血管结局、严重SAE和所有SAE。
共分析了74项随机临床试验:32项试验(43%)纳入了14190例年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者,24项试验(32%)纳入了5424例糖尿病视网膜病变(糖尿病性黄斑水肿或增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变)患者,17项试验(23%)纳入了3,757例视网膜静脉阻塞患者,1项试验(l%)纳入了122例近视性脉络膜新生血管患者。与对照药物相比,抗VEGF药物给药并未增加MACE(比值比[OR],1.16;95%置信区间[CI],0.85 - 1.58)或总死亡率(OR,1.27;95%CI,0.82 - 1.96)。根据潜在疾病,死亡率风险存在交互作用(亚组差异,P = 0.04),糖尿病视网膜病变患者的死亡风险增加(OR,1.80;95%CI, 1.03 - 3.16;P = 0.04);然而,AMD或视网膜静脉阻塞患者未观察到死亡风险增加。抗VEGF药物给药增加了非眼部出血的风险(OR,1.46;95%CI,1.01 - 2.10),主要发生在AMD患者中。
在本文所研究的试验中,玻璃体内抗VEGF与MACE增加无关。糖尿病患者死亡率增加和非眼部出血,尤其是AMD患者,可能代表一个安全信号,但证据并不充分。然而,对SAE进行持续监测仍然很有必要。