From the Family Medicine Residency Faculty, Harbor UCLA Family Medicine, Los Angeles, CA (CA); Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE (DMB); Core Faculty, Department of Family Medicine, Southwest IL Family Medicine Residency at St. Louis University, O'Fallon, IL (LWN); Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (BAT); Tenured Professor of Family and Preventive Medicine, Associate Vice President for Health Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, University of Utah, Salt Lake City UT (JER); Professor and Chair, Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (KMC).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;37(3):497-501. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230207R1.
Academic medicine continues to characterize the experiences of Black and other minoritized faculty in medicine to enhance their careers and promote their advancement. An issue of discussion is tenure and its role in the advancement and retention of this group. Tenure is a sign of national presence, command of an area of study, and can demonstrate support from the institution in terms of permanent employment, eligibility to apply for awards, sit or vote on certain committees or qualify for certain leadership opportunities. Anecdotally there have been reports that tenure is a thing of the past that has lost relevance prompting some to end tenure in their institutions. Reasons for this are complex, however the literature does not include minoritized faculty as a reason for the need to revise or eliminate tenure and tenure earning tracks. The authors discuss 3 reasons why Black and other minoritized faculty should be afforded the opportunity to achieve permanent status in their academic health centers. They include histories of being denied freedom, having information concealed or being giving false information, and being denied permanent academic employment status.
学术医学继续描述黑人及其他少数族裔医学教师的经历,以促进他们的职业发展并推动他们的晋升。讨论的一个问题是终身教职及其在该群体的晋升和留任中的作用。终身教职是国家存在的标志,是对某一研究领域的掌握,并且可以证明机构在永久性雇佣、获得奖项申请资格、在某些委员会任职或投票或有资格获得某些领导机会方面的支持。有传闻称,终身教职已经过时,已经失去了相关性,这促使一些人在自己的机构中取消终身教职。原因很复杂,但文献并没有将少数族裔教职员工列为需要修改或取消终身教职和终身教职获得途径的原因。作者讨论了黑人及其他少数族裔教职员工应该有机会在学术医疗中心获得永久地位的 3 个原因。这些原因包括被剥夺自由的历史、信息被隐瞒或被提供虚假信息以及被拒绝获得永久学术雇佣地位。