Teike Lüthi F, Bernard M, Behaghel G, Burgniard S, Larkin P, Borasio G D
Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chair of Palliative Care Nursing, Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Aug 5;5(1):350-358. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0080. eCollection 2024.
Identifying patients who require palliative care is a major public health concern. ID-PALL is the first screening instrument developed and validated to differentiate between patients in need of general versus specialized palliative care.
This study aimed to (1) evaluate user satisfaction and the facilitators and barriers for ID-PALL use and (2) assess the prevalence of patients who require palliative care.
A mixed methods study with an explanatory sequential design.
SETTING/SUBJECTS: Over a six-month period, patients admitted to two internal medicine wards of a Swiss tertiary hospital were screened by nurses and physicians with ID-PALL, two to three days after hospitalization. Nurses and physicians completed a questionnaire and participated in focus groups.
Out of 969 patients, ID-PALL was completed for 420 (43.3%). Sixty percent of patients assessed needed general palliative care and 26.7% specialized palliative care. From the questionnaire and focus groups, five subthemes were identified concerning facilitators and barriers: organization, knowledge, collaboration, meaning, and characteristics of the instrument. ID-PALL was recognized as an easy-to-use and helpful instrument that facilitates discussion between health care professionals about palliative care. The difficulties in using ID-PALL in nurse-physician collaboration and the paucity of referrals to the palliative care team were highlighted.
ID-PALL helped to identify a very high prevalence of palliative care needs among internal medicine patients in a tertiary hospital setting. Although regarded as helpful and easy to use, challenges remain concerning interprofessional implementation and inclusion of palliative care specialists, which may be met by automatic referrals in case of specialist needs.
识别需要姑息治疗的患者是一个重大的公共卫生问题。ID - PALL是首个开发并验证的用于区分需要一般姑息治疗与专科姑息治疗患者的筛查工具。
本研究旨在(1)评估用户满意度以及ID - PALL使用的促进因素和障碍,(2)评估需要姑息治疗患者的患病率。
采用解释性序列设计的混合方法研究。
设置/研究对象:在六个月的时间里,瑞士一家三级医院的两个内科病房收治的患者在住院两到三天后由护士和医生使用ID - PALL进行筛查。护士和医生完成了一份问卷并参加了焦点小组。
在969名患者中,420名(43.3%)完成了ID - PALL评估。评估的患者中有60%需要一般姑息治疗,26.7%需要专科姑息治疗。从问卷和焦点小组中,确定了关于促进因素和障碍的五个子主题:组织、知识、协作、意义和工具的特点。ID - PALL被认为是一种易于使用且有帮助的工具,有助于医护人员之间关于姑息治疗的讨论。强调了在护士 - 医生协作中使用ID - PALL的困难以及转介到姑息治疗团队的情况较少。
ID - PALL有助于识别三级医院内科患者中极高的姑息治疗需求患病率。尽管被认为有帮助且易于使用,但在跨专业实施和纳入姑息治疗专家方面仍存在挑战,在需要专家的情况下通过自动转介可能会解决这些问题。