• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家卫生研究院非洲弱势群体疫苗全球健康研究小组(VAnguard):概念与启动活动报告

NIHR Global Health Research Group on Vaccines for vulnerable people in Africa (VAnguard): Concept and Launch event report.

作者信息

Zirimenya Ludoviko, Zalwango Flavia, Owino Esther A, Karanja Henry K, Natukunda Agnes, Nkurunungi Gyaviira, Bukirwa Victoria, Kiwanuka Achilles, Chibita Monica, Mogire Reagan, Chi Primus, Webb Emily, Kaleebu Pontiano, Elliott Alison M

机构信息

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Entebbe, 49, Uganda.

出版信息

NIHR Open Res. 2023 Jun 27;3:35. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13417.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13417.1
PMID:39144544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11323737/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaccination is an important public health intervention, but not everyone benefits equally. Biological, social and structural factors render some communities vulnerable and unable to secure optimal health benefits from vaccination programmes. This drives health inequity and undermines wider vaccine impact by allowing the persistence of non-immune communities as foci for recurrent disease outbreaks. The NIHR Global Health Research Group on Vaccines for vulnerable people in Africa (VAnguard) aims to understand how biological, social, and structural factors interact to impair vaccine impact in vulnerable African communities.

METHODS

The VAnguard project will be implemented through three thematic work packages (1-3) and four cross-cutting work packages (4-7). Work package 1 will investigate the biological drivers and mechanisms of population differences in vaccine responses. Work package 2 will support the understanding of how structural, social and biological determinants of vaccine response interrelate to determine vaccine impact. Work package 3 will synthesise data and lead analyses to develop, model and test community-based integrated strategies to optimise vaccine access, uptake and effectiveness. Work package 4 will plan and implement field investigations (community survey and qualitative studies (with support of work package 2) to explore structural, social & biological determinants impairing vaccine impact. Work package 5 will collaborate with work packages 1-4, to engage communities in designing interventions that aim to directly optimise vaccine impact through a process of co-learning and co-creation between them and the researchers. Work package 6 will build capacity for, and a culture of, consultative, collaborative multidisciplinary vaccine research in East Africa. Work package 7 will support the overall project management and governance. Following the project inception on the 1 of September 2022, project launch was held in November 2022.

CONCLUSION

Results from this project will contribute to the development of integrated strategies that will optimise vaccine benefits and drive health equity.

摘要

背景

疫苗接种是一项重要的公共卫生干预措施,但并非每个人都能平等受益。生物、社会和结构因素使一些社区易受影响,无法从疫苗接种计划中获得最佳健康效益。这导致了健康不平等,并削弱了更广泛的疫苗影响,因为非免疫社区持续存在,成为疾病反复爆发的焦点。英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)非洲弱势群体疫苗全球健康研究小组(VAnguard)旨在了解生物、社会和结构因素如何相互作用,损害非洲弱势群体社区的疫苗影响。

方法

VAnguard项目将通过三个主题工作包(1-3)和四个跨领域工作包(4-7)实施。工作包1将调查疫苗反应人群差异的生物学驱动因素和机制。工作包2将有助于理解疫苗反应的结构、社会和生物学决定因素如何相互关联以确定疫苗影响。工作包3将综合数据并进行分析,以制定、建模和测试基于社区的综合策略,以优化疫苗的可及性、接种率和有效性。工作包4将规划和实施实地调查(社区调查和定性研究(在工作包2的支持下),以探索损害疫苗影响的结构、社会和生物学决定因素。工作包5将与工作包1-4合作,让社区参与设计干预措施,旨在通过他们与研究人员之间的共同学习和共同创造过程直接优化疫苗影响。工作包6将在东非建立协商、协作的多学科疫苗研究能力和文化。工作包7将支持整个项目的管理和治理。在2022年9月1日项目启动后,于2022年11月举行了项目启动仪式。

结论

该项目的结果将有助于制定综合策略,以优化疫苗效益并推动健康公平。

相似文献

1
NIHR Global Health Research Group on Vaccines for vulnerable people in Africa (VAnguard): Concept and Launch event report.英国国家卫生研究院非洲弱势群体疫苗全球健康研究小组(VAnguard):概念与启动活动报告
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Jun 27;3:35. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13417.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Tuberculosis结核病
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
7
Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.用于支持国民保健制度健康检查计划决策的建模工具:研讨会、系统评价以及与用户的共同制作。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(35):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta25350.
8
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
9
Investigating health and social outcomes of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England: a mixed method evaluation.调查英格兰“大地方”社区赋权计划对健康和社会结果的影响:一项混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Oct;11(9):1-147. doi: 10.3310/GRMA6711.
10
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of helminth infection on vaccine responses in humans and animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.寄生虫感染对人类和动物模型疫苗反应的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Parasite Immunol. 2022 Sep;44(9):e12939. doi: 10.1111/pim.12939. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme.持续的研究监测可提高研究行为的质量以及研究学员的合规性:一项监测计划的内部评估
AAS Open Res. 2020 Nov 25;3:57. doi: 10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1. eCollection 2020.
3
Unequal impact of the COVID-19 crisis on minority ethnic groups: a framework for understanding and addressing inequalities.COVID-19 危机对少数族裔的不平等影响:理解和解决不平等问题的框架。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Oct;75(10):970-974. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-216061. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Impact of BCG revaccination on the response to unrelated vaccines in a Ugandan adolescent birth cohort: randomised controlled trial protocol C for the 'POPulation differences in VACcine responses' (POPVAC) programme.卡介苗复种对乌干达青少年出生队列中无关疫苗反应的影响:“疫苗反应人群差异”(POPVAC)计划的随机对照试验方案 C。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e040430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040430.
5
Effect of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine on immune responses to vaccines among rural Ugandan adolescents: randomised controlled trial protocol B for the 'ulation differences in cine responses' (POPVAC) programme.二氢青蒿素-哌喹间歇性预防治疗疟疾对乌干达农村青少年疫苗免疫反应的影响:“人群疫苗反应差异”(POPVAC)计划的随机对照试验方案 B。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e040427. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040427.
6
Effect of intensive treatment for schistosomiasis on immune responses to vaccines among rural Ugandan island adolescents: randomised controlled trial protocol A for the 'ulation differences in cine responses' (POPVAC) programme.乌干达农村岛屿青少年中血吸虫病强化治疗对疫苗免疫反应的影响:“疫苗反应人群差异”(POPVAC)项目的随机对照试验方案A
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e040426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040426.
7
Population differences in vaccine responses (POPVAC): scientific rationale and cross-cutting analyses for three linked, randomised controlled trials assessing the role, reversibility and mediators of immunomodulation by chronic infections in the tropics.疫苗反应的人群差异(POPVAC):三项相关随机对照试验的科学依据和交叉分析,评估热带地区慢性感染对免疫调节的作用、可逆性及介导因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e040425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040425.
8
Urban living in healthy Tanzanians is associated with an inflammatory status driven by dietary and metabolic changes.坦桑尼亚健康城市居民的生活方式与饮食和代谢变化导致的炎症状态有关。
Nat Immunol. 2021 Mar;22(3):287-300. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00867-8. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Do parasite infections interfere with immunisation? A review and meta-analysis.寄生虫感染是否会干扰免疫接种?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 31;38(35):5582-5590. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.064. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
COVID-19 and routine childhood immunization in Africa: Leveraging systems thinking and implementation science to improve immunization system performance.非洲的新冠疫情与儿童常规免疫:利用系统思维和实施科学提高免疫系统绩效
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:161-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.072. Epub 2020 Jun 24.