School of Computer Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China.
Key Laboratory for Synergistic Prevention of Water and Soil Environmental Pollution, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1403414. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403414. eCollection 2024.
The Yellow River Basin has been instrumental in advancing ecological preservation and fostering national high-quality development. However, since the advent of China's reform and opening-up policies, the basin has faced severe environmental pollution issues. This study leverages remote sensing data from 1998 to 2019. As per the "Basin Scope and Its Historical Changes" published by the Yellow River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, the Yellow River Basin is categorized into upstream, midstream, and downstream regions for analysis of their spatial and temporal distribution traits using spatial autocorrelation methods. Additionally, we employed probes to study the effects of 10 factors, including mean surface temperature and air pressure, on PM2.5. The study findings reveal that (1) the annual average concentration of PM2.5 in the Yellow River Basin exhibited a fluctuating trend from 1998 to 2019, initially increasing, then decreasing, followed by another increase before ultimately declining. (2) The air quality in the Yellow River Basin is relatively poor, making it challenging for large-scale areas with low PM2.5 levels to occur. (3) The PM2.5 concentration in the Yellow River Basin exhibits distinct high and low-value concentration areas indicative of air pollution. Low-value areas are predominantly found in the sparsely populated central and southwestern plateau regions of Inner Mongolia, characterized by a better ecological environment. In contrast, high-value areas are prevalent in the inland areas of Northwest China, with poorer natural conditions, as well as densely populated zones with high energy demand and a relatively developed economy. (4) The overall population density in the Yellow River Basin, as well as in the upstream, midstream, and downstream regions, serves as a primary driving factor. (5) The primary drivers in the middle reaches and the entire Yellow River Basin remain consistent, whereas those in the upper and lower reaches have shifted. In the upstream, air pressure emerges as a primary driver of PM2.5, while in the downstream, NDVI and precipitation become the main influencing factors.
黄河流域在推进生态保护和培育国家高质量发展方面发挥了重要作用。然而,自中国改革开放政策实施以来,该流域面临着严重的环境污染问题。本研究利用了 1998 年至 2019 年的遥感数据。根据水利部黄河水利委员会发布的《流域范围及历史变化》,将黄河流域分为上游、中游和下游三个区域,采用空间自相关方法分析其时空分布特征。此外,我们还利用探测工具研究了 10 个因素(包括平均地表温度和气压)对 PM2.5 的影响。研究结果表明:(1)1998 年至 2019 年,黄河流域年平均 PM2.5 浓度呈波动趋势,先增加后减少,再增加后再次减少。(2)黄河流域的空气质量相对较差,大面积低 PM2.5 水平的情况难以出现。(3)黄河流域 PM2.5 浓度呈现出明显的高值和低值浓度区,表明存在空气污染。低值区主要分布在内蒙古人口稀少的中部和西南部高原地区,生态环境较好。相比之下,高值区主要分布在中国西北部内陆地区,这些地区自然条件较差,人口密集,能源需求高,经济相对发达。(4)黄河流域以及上游、中游和下游地区的整体人口密度是主要驱动因素。(5)中游和整个黄河流域的主要驱动因素保持一致,而上游和下游的主要驱动因素发生了变化。在上游,气压是 PM2.5 的主要驱动因素,而在下游,NDVI 和降水成为主要影响因素。