• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将 PROMIS-29 v2.0 量表数据转换为心血管疾病患者的 SF-36 生理和心理成分综合评分。

Converting PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile data to SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores in patients with cardiovascular disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Aug 15;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02277-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-024-02277-4
PMID:39148105
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11328444/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) has become an important outcome parameter in cardiology. The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the PROMIS-29 are two widely used generic measures providing composite HRQL scores. The domains of the SF-36, a well-established instrument utilized for several decades, can be aggregated to physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores. Alternative scoring algorithms for correlated component scores (PCS and MCS) have also been suggested. The PROMIS-29 is a newer but increasingly used HRQL measure. Analogous to the SF-36, physical and mental health summary scores can be derived from PROMIS-29 domain scores, based on a correlated factor solution. So far, scores from the PROMIS-29 are not directly comparable to SF-36 results, complicating the aggregation of research findings. Thus, our aim was to provide algorithms to convert PROMIS-29 data to well-established SF-36 component summary scores.

METHODS

Data from n = 662 participants of the Berlin Long-term Observation of Vascular Events (BeLOVE) study were used to estimate linear regression models with either PROMIS-29 domain scores or aggregated PROMIS-29 physical/mental health summary scores as predictors and SF-36 physical/mental component summary scores as outcomes. Data from a subsequent assessment point (n = 259) were used to evaluate the agreement between empirical and predicted SF-36 scores.

RESULTS

PROMIS-29 domain scores as well as PROMIS-29 health summary scores showed high predictive value for PCS, PCS, and MCS (R ≥ 70%), and moderate predictive value for MCS (R = 57% and R = 40%, respectively). After applying the regression coefficients to new data, empirical and predicted SF-36 component summary scores were highly correlated (r > 0.8) for most models. Mean differences between empirical and predicted scores were negligible (|SMD|<0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides easy-to-apply algorithms to convert PROMIS-29 data to well-established SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores in a cardiovascular population. Applied to new data, the agreement between empirical and predicted SF-36 scores was high. However, for SF-36 mental component summary scores, considerably better predictions were found under the correlated (MCS) than under the original factor model (MCS). Additionally, as a pertinent byproduct, our study confirmed construct validity of the relatively new PROMIS-29 health summary scores in cardiology patients.

摘要

背景

健康相关生活质量(HRQL)已成为心脏病学中的一个重要结果参数。MOS 36 项简短健康调查(SF-36)和 PROMIS-29 是两种广泛使用的通用措施,可提供综合 HRQL 评分。SF-36 是一种经过充分验证的仪器,已经使用了几十年,可以聚合为身体(PCS)和精神(MCS)组成部分摘要评分。还提出了用于相关组成部分评分(PCS 和 MCS)的替代评分算法。PROMIS-29 是一种较新但越来越受欢迎的 HRQL 测量方法。类似于 SF-36,可以根据相关因素解决方案从 PROMIS-29 域分数中得出身体和心理健康摘要分数。到目前为止,PROMIS-29 的分数与 SF-36 结果无法直接比较,这使得研究结果的聚合变得复杂。因此,我们的目的是提供将 PROMIS-29 数据转换为既定的 SF-36 组成部分摘要评分的算法。

方法

使用来自柏林血管事件长期观察(BeLOVE)研究的 n = 662 名参与者的数据来估计线性回归模型,其中 PROMIS-29 域评分或聚合的 PROMIS-29 身体/心理健康摘要评分作为预测因子,SF-36 身体/心理健康组成部分摘要评分作为结果。使用随后的评估点(n = 259)的数据来评估经验和预测的 SF-36 分数之间的一致性。

结果

PROMIS-29 域评分以及 PROMIS-29 健康摘要评分对 PCS、PCS 和 MCS 具有很高的预测价值(R≥70%),对 MCS 具有中等的预测价值(R=57%和 R=40%)。将回归系数应用于新数据后,大多数模型的经验和预测的 SF-36 组成部分摘要评分高度相关(r>0.8)。经验和预测分数之间的平均差异可忽略不计(|SMD|<0.1)。

结论

本研究提供了一种易于应用的算法,可以将 PROMIS-29 数据转换为心血管人群中既定的 SF-36 身体和精神组成部分摘要评分。在新数据上应用时,经验和预测的 SF-36 分数之间的一致性很高。但是,对于 SF-36 精神成分综合评分,在相关(MCS)模型下的预测明显优于原始因子模型(MCS)。此外,作为一个相关的副产品,我们的研究证实了相对较新的 PROMIS-29 健康摘要评分在心脏病患者中的结构效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d7/11328444/96915e9a4d98/12955_2024_2277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d7/11328444/8c9d367fc65a/12955_2024_2277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d7/11328444/96915e9a4d98/12955_2024_2277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d7/11328444/8c9d367fc65a/12955_2024_2277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25d7/11328444/96915e9a4d98/12955_2024_2277_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Converting PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile data to SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores in patients with cardiovascular disorders.将 PROMIS-29 v2.0 量表数据转换为心血管疾病患者的 SF-36 生理和心理成分综合评分。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Aug 15;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02277-4.
2
Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I.SF-36和SF-12健康调查的相关身心健康综合评分,第一版
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Sep 7;5:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-54.
3
PROMIS measures can be used to assess symptoms and function in long-term hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors.PROMIS 测量可用于评估长期造血细胞移植幸存者的症状和功能。
Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):841-849. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31089. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
4
The Relationship Among 3 Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Patients With Lower Extremity Health Conditions.下肢健康状况患者中 3 种通用患者报告结局量表之间的关系。
J Athl Train. 2019 May;54(5):550-555. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-350-17. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
The sensitivity of the MOS SF-12 and PROMIS® global summary scores to adverse health events in an older cohort.MOS SF-12 和 PROMIS® 全球总分对老年队列不良健康事件的敏感性。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2207-2215. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1871-y. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
Beware of the origin of numbers: Standard scoring of the SF-12 and SF-36 summary measures distorts measurement and score interpretations.注意数值的来源:SF-12和SF-36总结指标的标准评分会扭曲测量结果和分数解释。
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Aug;40(4):378-386. doi: 10.1002/nur.21806.
7
Measuring health-related quality of life: psychometric evaluation of the Tunisian version of the SF-12 health survey.测量健康相关生活质量:SF-12健康调查突尼斯版本的心理测量评估
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2047-54. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0641-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
Development and testing of the UK SF-12 (short form health survey).英国SF-12(简明健康调查问卷)的开发与测试。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Jan;2(1):14-8. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200105.
9
Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores?SF-36总结成分得分能否准确概括各子量表得分?
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(5):395-404. doi: 10.1023/a:1012552211996.
10
Association between PROMIS10, SF-36 and NeuroQoL in persons with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者中 PROMIS10、SF-36 与 NeuroQoL 的相关性。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Nov;79:105003. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105003. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Post-Procedural Atrial Arrhythmia on Long-Term Cardiac Function and Quality of Life Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.卵圆孔未闭封堵术后房性心律失常对长期心脏功能和生活质量的影响。
Cardiol Res. 2025 Jul 28;16(4):373-379. doi: 10.14740/cr2105. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Towards Standardized Assessment of Outcomes in Back Pain-Validation of Linking Studies Between Disease-Specific and Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.迈向背痛结局的标准化评估——疾病特异性与通用患者报告结局指标关联研究的验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 30;13(21):6524. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216524.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping Short Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) to Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) to estimate health utilities.将 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(SWEMWBS)简式量表与康复质量量表(ReQoL)进行匹配,以估算健康效用值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jan 15;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02220-z.
2
Protocol of the Berlin Long-term Observation of Vascular Events (BeLOVE): a prospective cohort study with deep phenotyping and long-term follow up of cardiovascular high-risk patients.柏林血管事件长期观察方案(BeLOVE):对心血管高危患者进行深度表型分析和长期随访的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e076415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076415.
3
Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical, Mental, and Social Health Measures After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Implications for Patient Care.
植入左心室辅助装置后患者报告结局测量信息系统身体、心理和社会健康测量的有效性及其对患者护理的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Feb;16(2):e008690. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008690. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Measurement properties of the Dutch PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile in people with and without chronic conditions.荷兰 PROMIS-29 v2.1 简表在有和无慢性病人群中的测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):3447-3458. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03171-6. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病中患者报告的结局指标
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Feb 28;9(2):119-127. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051.
6
Developing a common metric for depression across adulthood: Linking PROMIS depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.开发成年期抑郁症的通用度量标准:将 PROMIS 抑郁症与爱丁堡产后抑郁量表联系起来。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Jul;33(7):610-618. doi: 10.1037/pas0001009. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
Exploratory factor analysis of PROMIS-29 V1.0, PROMIS Global Health and the RAND SF-36 from chiropractic responders attending care in a practice-based research network.基于实践网络的脊椎按摩响应者接受治疗时,对 PROMIS-29 V1.0、PROMIS 全球健康和 RAND SF-36 进行探索性因素分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 10;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01725-9.
8
Predicting EQ-5D-5L crosswalk from the PROMIS-29 profile for the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.预测英国、法国和德国的 PROMIS-29 概况与 EQ-5D-5L 的换算关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 17;18(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01629-0.
9
Using subdomain-specific item sets affected PROMIS physical function scores differently in cardiology and rheumatology patients.使用特定于子域的项目集对心脏病学和风湿病患者的 PROMIS 身体功能评分的影响不同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Computing PROPr Utility Scores for PROMIS® Profile Instruments.计算 PROMIS® Profile 工具的 PROPr 效用评分。
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2752. Epub 2019 Dec 30.