• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Randomized, double-blind comparison of ceftazidime and moxalactam in complicated urinary tract infections.头孢他啶与拉氧头孢在复杂性尿路感染中的随机双盲对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Aug;28(2):299-301. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.2.299.
2
Ceftazidime in treatment of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury: comparison with moxalactam.头孢他啶治疗脊髓损伤患者尿路感染:与拉氧头孢比较
Urology. 1990 Jan;35(1):93-5. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80024-h.
3
Double-blind, prospective, multicenter trial comparing ceftazidime with moxalactam in the treatment of serious gram-negative infections.一项双盲、前瞻性、多中心试验,比较头孢他啶与拉氧头孢治疗严重革兰氏阴性菌感染的效果。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jul;30(1):90-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.30.1.90.
4
Comparison of moxalactam and gentamicin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与庆大霉素治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Oct;24(4):494-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.24.4.494.
5
Randomized, double-blind comparative study of intravenous ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections.
Am J Med. 1989 Nov 30;87(5A):160S-163S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90049-1.
6
Ceftazidime-avibactam or best available therapy in patients with ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa complicated urinary tract infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections (REPRISE): a randomised, pathogen-directed, phase 3 study.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦或最佳现有治疗在头孢他啶耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌引起的复杂性尿路感染或复杂性腹腔内感染患者中的应用(REPRISE):一项随机、针对病原体的 3 期研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):661-673. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30004-4. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Randomized comparison of cefepime and ceftazidime for treatment of skin, surgical wound, and complicated urinary tract infections in hospitalized subjects.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗住院患者皮肤、手术伤口及复杂性尿路感染的随机对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Nov;35(11):2371-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.11.2371.
8
An open trial of ceftazidime in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.头孢他啶治疗复杂性尿路感染的开放试验。
J Int Med Res. 1984;12(6):361-3. doi: 10.1177/030006058401200608.
9
Carumonam versus ceftazidime for urinary tract infections.卡芦莫南与头孢他啶治疗尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Jul;32(7):1031-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.7.1031.
10
Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与妥布霉素治疗尿路感染的前瞻性随机双盲比较
Am J Med. 1983 Apr;74(4):694-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91029-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated urinary tract infection in adults.成人复杂性尿路感染。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2005 Nov;16(6):349-60. doi: 10.1155/2005/385768.
2
A multicentre, randomized comparative study of 500 mg versus 1,000 mg ceftazidime t.d.s. for treatment on gram-negative infections.一项多中心随机对照研究,比较头孢他啶每日三次500毫克与1000毫克用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的效果。
Infection. 1995 Jul-Aug;23(4):222-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01781202.
3
Carumonam versus ceftazidime for urinary tract infections.卡芦莫南与头孢他啶治疗尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Jul;32(7):1031-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.7.1031.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacokinetics of the monobactam SQ 26,776 after single intravenous doses in healthy subjects.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Dec;8 Suppl E:131-40. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_e.131.
2
Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection.与医院获得性尿路感染相关的死亡率
N Engl J Med. 1982 Sep 9;307(11):637-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198209093071101.
3
GR 20263, a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin with anti-pseudomonal activity.GR 20263,一种具有抗假单胞菌活性的新型广谱头孢菌素。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 May;17(5):876-83. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.5.876.
4
Nosocomial urinary tract infections: secular trends, treatment and economics in a university hospital.
J Urol. 1983 Jul;130(1):102-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50980-5.
5
The new beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins.新型β-内酰胺酶稳定的头孢菌素。
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):408-19. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-408.
6
Comparison of moxalactam and gentamicin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.羟羧氧酰胺菌素与庆大霉素治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Oct;24(4):494-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.24.4.494.
7
Novel resistance selected by the new expanded-spectrum cephalosporins: a concern.新型广谱头孢菌素所选择的新型耐药性:一个值得关注的问题。
J Infect Dis. 1983 Mar;147(3):585-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.3.585.
8
Enterococcal superinfection and colonization after therapy with moxalactam, a new broad-spectrum antibiotic.新型广谱抗生素羟羧氧酰胺菌素治疗后肠球菌的二重感染与定植
Ann Intern Med. 1981 Jun;94(6):784-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-94-6-784.
9
A comparison of ceftazidime and tobramycin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.头孢他啶与妥布霉素治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jul;12 Suppl A:47-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.47.
10
Emergence of resistance to beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics during moxalactam therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.在使用羟羧氧酰胺菌素治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染期间,对β-内酰胺类和氨基糖苷类抗生素产生耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Dec;22(6):1037-41. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.6.1037.

头孢他啶与拉氧头孢在复杂性尿路感染中的随机双盲对照研究。

Randomized, double-blind comparison of ceftazidime and moxalactam in complicated urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Horowitz E A, Preheim L C, Safranek T J, Pugsley M P, Sanders C C, Bittner M J

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Aug;28(2):299-301. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.2.299.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.28.2.299
PMID:3914859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC180235/
Abstract

Sixty-seven patients with complicated urinary tract infections were randomized in double-blind fashion to ceftazidime or moxalactam (MOX). A total of 54 patients were evaluable, 27 in each group. Patients received 500 mg of antibiotic intravenously every 12 h, except for those with Pseudomonas aeruginosa randomized to MOX who received 2 g intravenously every 12 h. Toxic effects with ceftazidime were experienced by the following number of patients: pain with infusion, one; posttherapy diarrhea, one; liver function test elevations, two; and neutropenia, one. Toxic effects with MOX were experienced by the following number of patients: liver function test elevations, two; and prolonged prothrombin time, one. All resolved. At 1 week posttherapy, bacteriologic results were 74% cured, 11% relapsed, 15% reinfection with ceftazidime and 52% cured, 33% relapsed, and 19% reinfection with MOX. Ceftazidime was effective for infections caused by MOX-resistant P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa resistant to MOX and other beta-lactams was isolated from one patient after MOX therapy. Enterococcal reinfection was common in both groups.

摘要

67例复杂性尿路感染患者被随机双盲分为头孢他啶组或拉氧头孢(MOX)组。共有54例患者可进行评估,每组27例。患者每12小时静脉注射500毫克抗生素,但随机分配到MOX组的铜绿假单胞菌感染患者每12小时静脉注射2克。头孢他啶产生的毒性反应有以下例数的患者出现:输液时疼痛,1例;治疗后腹泻,1例;肝功能检查升高,2例;中性粒细胞减少,1例。MOX产生的毒性反应有以下例数的患者出现:肝功能检查升高,2例;凝血酶原时间延长,1例。所有不良反应均已缓解。治疗后1周,头孢他啶组细菌学结果为74%治愈、11%复发、15%再感染;MOX组为52%治愈、33%复发、19%再感染。头孢他啶对MOX耐药的铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染有效。MOX治疗后从1例患者中分离出对MOX和其他β-内酰胺类耐药的铜绿假单胞菌。两组肠球菌再感染均很常见。