• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心随机对照研究,比较头孢他啶每日三次500毫克与1000毫克用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的效果。

A multicentre, randomized comparative study of 500 mg versus 1,000 mg ceftazidime t.d.s. for treatment on gram-negative infections.

作者信息

Mattie H, Kunst M W, Schievink H I, Jonker P L, de Jonge P

机构信息

University Hospital Leiden, Dept. of Infectious Diseases.

出版信息

Infection. 1995 Jul-Aug;23(4):222-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01781202.

DOI:10.1007/BF01781202
PMID:8522380
Abstract

A multicentre, randomized study was performed to compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of 500 mg ceftazidime i.v. t.d.s. with 1,000 mg ceftazidime i.v. t.d.s. for treatment of hospitalised, non-compromised patients with gram-negative infections. The study was conducted in ten hospitals in The Netherlands. Hospitalised patients with a suspected gram-negative lower respiratory tract infection, complicated urinary tract infection or septicaemia were included. Excluded were patients with neutropenia, limited life expectancy, or severe renal insufficiency as well as those on antibiotics in the 48 h prior to entry. Ceftazidime was administered via an intravenous infusion every 8 h. For patients with moderately impaired renal function the frequency was reduced to 12 h. Treatment was continued for as long as clinically indicated. Clinical response (cure, improvement or failure) and bacteriological response (elimination, persistence or non-evaluable) were assessed primarily by the investigator. Final assessments were made by a panel of experts without prior knowledge. In total 127 patients were randomized, 64 patients to the 500 mg group and 63 to the 1,000 mg group; 47 patients were excluded from evaluation, usually due to an incorrect diagnosis prior to randomization. Ultimately 37 patients of the 500 mg group and 43 patients of the 1,000 mg group were available for evaluation. Between these two groups of evaluable patients there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, types of infection, isolated bacterial pathogens or treatment characteristics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一项多中心随机研究开展,比较静脉滴注500毫克头孢他啶每日三次与1000毫克头孢他啶每日三次治疗住院的、无合并症的革兰氏阴性菌感染患者的临床和细菌学疗效。该研究在荷兰的十家医院进行。纳入疑似革兰氏阴性菌引起的下呼吸道感染、复杂性尿路感染或败血症的住院患者。排除中性粒细胞减少症患者、预期寿命有限的患者、严重肾功能不全患者以及入组前48小时内使用过抗生素的患者。头孢他啶每8小时通过静脉输注给药。对于肾功能中度受损的患者,给药频率减至每12小时一次。根据临床指征持续治疗。临床反应(治愈、改善或失败)和细菌学反应(清除、持续存在或不可评估)主要由研究者评估。最终评估由一组不知情的专家进行。共有127例患者随机分组,64例患者分入500毫克组,63例分入1000毫克组;47例患者被排除评估,通常是由于随机分组前诊断错误。最终,500毫克组有37例患者、1000毫克组有43例患者可供评估。在这两组可评估患者之间,基线特征、感染类型、分离出的细菌病原体或治疗特征方面无显著差异。(摘要截短至250字)

相似文献

1
A multicentre, randomized comparative study of 500 mg versus 1,000 mg ceftazidime t.d.s. for treatment on gram-negative infections.一项多中心随机对照研究,比较头孢他啶每日三次500毫克与1000毫克用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染的效果。
Infection. 1995 Jul-Aug;23(4):222-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01781202.
2
Comparison of clinical cure rates in adults with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with intravenous ceftazidime administered by continuous or intermittent infusion: a retrospective, nonrandomized, open-label, historical chart review.持续输注与间歇输注静脉用头孢他啶治疗成人呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床治愈率比较:一项回顾性、非随机、开放标签、历史病历回顾研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.003.
3
Safety and efficacy of cefepime versus ceftazidime in the treatment of severe infections.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗严重感染的安全性和有效性
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2002 Sep;35(3):159-67.
4
A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.一项比较头孢托罗培南与万古霉素加头孢他啶治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者的随机双盲试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;46(5):647-55. doi: 10.1086/526527.
5
An open, randomized, multicentre study comparing the use of low-dose ceftazidime or cefotaxime, both in combination with netilmicin, in febrile neutropenic patients. German Multicentre Study Group.一项开放性、随机、多中心研究,比较低剂量头孢他啶或头孢噻肟联合奈替米星在发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中的应用。德国多中心研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Sep;44(3):367-76. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.3.367.
6
Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind trial.美罗培南与头孢他啶治疗癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机双盲试验
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 1;18(21):3690-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.21.3690.
7
Cefpirome versus ceftazidime in the treatment of urinary tract infections.头孢匹罗与头孢他啶治疗尿路感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992 Apr;29 Suppl A:95-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/29.suppl_a.95.
8
International comparative study of cefepime and ceftazidime in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗严重细菌感染的国际比较研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Nov;32 Suppl B:175-86. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.175.
9
Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Novel Cephalosporin/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Resistant Gram-negative Organisms.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦:一种用于治疗耐药革兰氏阴性菌的新型头孢菌素/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):431-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Randomized comparative trial of cefpirome versus ceftazidime in the empirical treatment of suspected bacteraemia or sepsis. Multicentre Study Group.头孢匹罗与头孢他啶用于疑似菌血症或败血症经验性治疗的随机对照试验。多中心研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Oct;42(4):503-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.4.503.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical experience with ceftazidime for lower respiratory tract infections.头孢他啶治疗下呼吸道感染的临床经验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:307-10. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.307.
2
Trial of ceftazidime efficacy in respiratory infections at two dose levels.头孢他啶在两个剂量水平治疗呼吸道感染疗效的试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981 Sep;8 Suppl B:299-301. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.299.
3
Ceftazidime in the treatment of complicated respiratory and urinary tract infections.头孢他啶治疗复杂性呼吸道和泌尿道感染。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jul;12 Suppl A:59-64. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.59.
4
A random comparative trial of 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 g ceftazidime twice daily in urinary tract infection.一项关于每日两次使用0.25克、0.5克和1.0克头孢他啶治疗尿路感染的随机对照试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jul;12 Suppl A:53-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.53.
5
A comparison of ceftazidime and tobramycin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.头孢他啶与妥布霉素治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jul;12 Suppl A:47-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.47.
6
Ceftazidime, an open randomized comparison of 3 dosages for genitourinary infections.头孢他啶治疗泌尿生殖系统感染三种剂量的开放性随机对照研究。
J Urol. 1983 Sep;130(3):495-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51271-9.
7
The pharmacokinetic behaviour of ceftazidime in man and the relationship between serum levels and the in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates.头孢他啶在人体内的药代动力学行为以及血清水平与临床分离株体外敏感性之间的关系。
Infection. 1983;11 Suppl 1:S49-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01641107.
8
Randomized, double-blind comparison of ceftazidime and moxalactam in complicated urinary tract infections.头孢他啶与拉氧头孢在复杂性尿路感染中的随机双盲对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Aug;28(2):299-301. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.2.299.
9
Ceftazidime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.头孢他啶。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1985 Feb;29(2):105-61. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198529020-00002.
10
Cephalosporins in cutaneous infections. A prospective comparison of two dosage regimens of ceftazidime for therapy of skin and skin structure infections.头孢菌素在皮肤感染中的应用。头孢他啶两种给药方案治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染的前瞻性比较。
Int J Dermatol. 1986 May;25(4):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1986.tb02239.x.