• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版乳腺癌生活态度自评问卷的信度、效度及敏感性

Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Life Attitude Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Zhou Kaina, Wang Wen, Ning Fan, Wang Xiao, Zhao Fang

机构信息

School of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e14110. doi: 10.1111/jep.14110. Epub 2024 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1111/jep.14110
PMID:39155619
Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Psychometrics of the Chinese Life Attitude Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (LASQ-BC) has not yet been conducted in a larger sample of women with breast cancer. This study aimed to examine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the LASQ-BC in Chinese mainland female breast cancer patients.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study. Reliability was determined by Cronbach's α and Guttman split-half coefficient. Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated via item-subscale and item-total score correlations. Factorial validity was estimated using a principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Sensitivity was identified via Cohen's effect size (ES) and an independent sample t-test between the new and recurrent cases. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to further examine sensitivity of the LASQ-BC under the influence of newly diagnosed breast cancer (yes vs. no).

RESULTS

A total of 429 patients completed the questionnaire. Cronbach's α of the LASQ-BC was 0.96, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 for the four subscales (i.e., choice and responsibility, life meaning, benevolence, and life experiences). The Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.90. The hypothesised item-subscale and item-total score correlations were higher than the critical value of 0.50. Four factors were extracted from the 23 items, explaining 69.29% of the total variance. Eligible ES (range: 0.38-0.48) was found in the four subscales and total score between the new and recurrent cases (independent sample t-test), and under the influence of newly diagnosed breast cancer (yes vs. no; multiple linear regression analysis).

CONCLUSION

The Chinese LASQ-BC has acceptable reliability, validity, and sensitivity in women with breast cancer of mainland China. It can be used to female breast cancer patients as an invaluable metric and a crucial instrument for assessing and discerning those grappling with a suboptimal life attitude, and in gauging the efficacy of psychological interventions tailored to enhance this perspective.

摘要

研究理由、目的和目标:尚未在更大样本的乳腺癌女性中对中文版乳腺癌生活态度自评问卷(LASQ - BC)进行心理测量学研究。本研究旨在检验LASQ - BC在中国内地女性乳腺癌患者中的信度、效度和敏感性。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。通过克朗巴哈α系数和古特曼折半系数确定信度。通过项目 - 子量表和项目 - 总分相关性评估收敛效度和区分效度。使用主成分分析和方差最大旋转估计因子效度。通过科恩效应量(ES)以及新发病例和复发病例之间的独立样本t检验确定敏感性。采用多元线性回归分析进一步检验LASQ - BC在新诊断乳腺癌(是与否)影响下的敏感性。

结果

共有429名患者完成问卷。LASQ - BC的克朗巴哈α系数为0.96,四个子量表(即选择与责任、生活意义、仁爱和生活经历)的系数范围为0.86至0.92。古特曼折半系数为0.90。假设的项目 - 子量表和项目 - 总分相关性高于临界值0.50。从23个项目中提取出四个因子,解释了总方差的69.29%。在四个子量表和总分中,新发病例和复发病例之间(独立样本t检验)以及在新诊断乳腺癌影响下(是与否;多元线性回归分析)发现了符合条件的效应量(范围:0.38 - 0.48)。

结论

中文版LASQ - BC在中国内地乳腺癌女性中具有可接受的信度、效度和敏感性。它可作为一种宝贵的测量工具用于女性乳腺癌患者,是评估和识别那些生活态度欠佳者以及衡量为改善这种观念而量身定制的心理干预效果的关键工具。

相似文献

1
Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Life Attitude Self-rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer.中文版乳腺癌生活态度自评问卷的信度、效度及敏感性
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e14110. doi: 10.1111/jep.14110. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
The Needs Self-Rating Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (NSQ-BC): Development of a tool for the needs assessment of women with breast cancer in mainland China.乳腺癌需求自评问卷(NSQ-BC):中国大陆地区乳腺癌女性需求评估工具的开发。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):889-895. doi: 10.1111/jep.13113. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
3
Development of the body image self-rating questionnaire for breast cancer (BISQ-BC) for Chinese mainland patients.中国大陆乳腺癌患者体像自评问卷(BISQ-BC)的研制。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 4;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3865-5.
4
Psychometrics of chronic liver disease questionnaire in Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients.中文版慢性乙型肝炎患者慢性肝病问卷的心理测量学特性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 14;19(22):3494-501. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3494.
5
Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) in women with breast cancer.中文简体版 36 健康调查短表第二版(SF-36v2)在女性乳腺癌患者中的信度、效度和灵敏度。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):864-872. doi: 10.1111/jep.13088. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of adjustment disorder new module-20 in breast cancer patients.中文版适应障碍新模块-20 在乳腺癌患者中的心理计量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Dec 9;8(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00494-2.
7
Validity and Reliability of a Simplified Chinese Version of Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs Scale (CaSUN).癌症幸存者未满足需求量表(CaSUN)简体中文版的有效性和可靠性。
Psychooncology. 2024 Oct;33(10):e70008. doi: 10.1002/pon.70008.
8
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
9
Reliability and validity of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in Chinese mainland patients with methadone maintenance treatment.多维感知社会支持量表在中国内地美沙酮维持治疗患者中的信效度研究
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;60:182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Translation, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Confidence in Dementia Scale for Clinical Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Study.中文版临床护理痴呆症信心量表的翻译、信效度:一项横断面研究
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Jan;20(1):e70008. doi: 10.1111/opn.70008.

引用本文的文献

1
The mediating role of attribution style between psychological predictors and resilience in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.归因风格在新诊断乳腺癌女性心理预测因素与心理弹性之间的中介作用:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 15;33(5):382. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09457-y.