Comparison of long-term clinical outcome after endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment of ruptured intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms: A single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION

In patients with anterior circulation aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (aSAH), endovascular coiling is currently practiced more frequently than neurosurgical clipping. However, despite multiple previous studies, it is still uncertain whether coiling is favourable in terms of long-term clinical outcome.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the effect of clipping versus coiling on long-term functional outcome of patients with an aSAH?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All anterior circulation aSAH patients (2012-2015) treated with clipping or coiling in two hospitals in the Netherlands were studied up to five years after treatment. Functional outcome, survival, retreatment- and complication rate were measured. Survival analysis was performed in both groups. A multivariable regression model with covariate adjustment was performed to investigate the likelihood of unfavourable outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2).

RESULTS

Out of 204 patients, 75 patients were clipped (37%) and 129 received coiling (63%). Coiling had a higher retreatment rate compared to clipping (7.8% vs. 0.0%). Unfavourable outcome at six, 12, 24 and 60 months after treatment was higher for patients after clipping compared to coiling, but was not significant after correcting for clinical severity as represented by the WFNS grade. In 60 months, no difference in survival was found between clipping and coiling.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

No differences between clipping and coiling in survival and long-term functional outcome have been found in this study. More research with prospective design and large cohorts is needed to identify possible differences between the two treatments.