Zhao Yidong, Chen Tao, Yang Ling, Mao Wenjie, Wan Yu, Zhang Liwen, Ding Heng, Cai Gaojun, Huang Zhiying
Department of Pediatrics, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Cardiology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 2;11:1428083. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1428083. eCollection 2024.
Distal radial artery (DRA) access is an infrequent alternative access for pediatric catheterization. The feasibility of using the DRA for arterial catheterization in children depends on the vessel's size.
This study aims to provide a reference for pediatric catheterization via DRA access by evaluating the diameter of the DRA in the anatomic snuffbox (AS).
We conducted a retrospective review of clinical and vascular ultrasound data of 412 children (ages 3-12) who were scheduled for arterial blood gas analysis via the DRA due to serious respiratory diseases between June 2023 and October 2023.
The corrected DRA diameter in the AS was 1.97 ± 0.37 mm overall, with no significant difference between males (1.98 ± 0.38 mm) and females (1.95 ± 0.35 mm) (= 0.457). The anteroposterior, transverse, and corrected DRA diameters increased significantly with age (< 0.05). The DRA diameter was significantly smaller than the proximal radial artery (PRA) diameter (1.97 ± 0.37 mm vs. 2.05 ± 0.33 mm, < 0.001) but larger than the ulnar artery (UA) diameter (1.97 ± 0.37 mm vs. 1.88 ± 0.33 mm, < 0.001). The proportions of patients with a DRA diameter greater than 2.0 mm and 1.5 mm were 38.83% and 86.89%, respectively. The proportions of patients with DRA diameters >2.0 mm and >1.5 mm increased significantly with age ( < 0.01). The percentages of individuals with a DRA/PRA ratio ≥1.0 were 55.10% overall, 52.12% in males, and 58.60% in females. DRA diameter showed significant correlations with age (r = 0.275, < 0.01), height (r = 0.319, < 0.01), weight (r = 0.319, < 0.01), BMI (r = 0.241, < 0.01), wrist circumference (r = 0.354, < 0.01), PRA diameter (r = 0.521, < 0.01), and UA diameter (r = 0.272, < 0.01).
The DRA diameter in children increases with age and size, making cardiac catheterization is theoretically feasible. Preoperative evaluation of the vessel diameter and intraoperative ultrasound-guided intervention are recommended for paediatric catheterization via the DRA access.
桡动脉远端(DRA)入路是小儿导管插入术较少使用的替代入路。儿童使用DRA进行动脉导管插入术的可行性取决于血管大小。
本研究旨在通过评估解剖鼻烟窝(AS)处DRA的直径,为经DRA入路进行小儿导管插入术提供参考。
我们对2023年6月至2023年10月期间因严重呼吸系统疾病计划经DRA进行动脉血气分析的412名儿童(3至12岁)的临床和血管超声数据进行了回顾性分析。
AS处校正后的DRA直径总体为1.97±0.37 mm,男性(1.98±0.38 mm)和女性(1.95±0.35 mm)之间无显著差异(=0.457)。前后径、横径和校正后的DRA直径随年龄显著增加(<0.05)。DRA直径显著小于桡动脉近端(PRA)直径(1.97±0.37 mm对2.05±0.33 mm,<0.001),但大于尺动脉(UA)直径(1.97±0.37 mm对1.88±0.33 mm,<0.001)。DRA直径大于2.0 mm和1.5 mm的患者比例分别为38.83%和86.89%。DRA直径>2.0 mm和>1.5 mm的患者比例随年龄显著增加(<0.01)。DRA/PRA比值≥1.0的个体总体百分比为55.10%,男性为52.12%,女性为58.60%。DRA直径与年龄(r=0.275,<0.01)、身高(r=0.319,<0.01)、体重(r=0.319,<0.01)、BMI(r=0.241,<0.01)、腕围(r=0.354,<0.01)、PRA直径(r=0.521,<0.01)和UA直径(r=0.272,<0.01)显著相关。
儿童DRA直径随年龄和体型增加,理论上使心脏导管插入术可行。建议对经DRA入路的小儿导管插入术进行术前血管直径评估和术中超声引导干预。