Suppr超能文献

头皮伤口缝合中吻合钉与缝线的比较:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机试验。

Staples versus sutures in the closure of scalp wounds: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial.

作者信息

Ritchie A J, Rocke L G

机构信息

Accident and Emergency Department, Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast.

出版信息

Injury. 1989 Jul;20(4):217-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90116-2.

Abstract

Over a 6-month period, patients attending the Accident and Emergency Department of the Mater Infirmorum Hospital with scalp wounds were randomly allocated to one of two groups for closure of their wounds with either nylon sutures or metal staples. Each group contained 100 patients. Patients were reviewed at 5 days (95 per cent) after the removal of sutures or staples and again at 3 weeks (61 per cent). The two groups were similar for age, sex, aetiology and wound characteristics. There was no difference in morbidity or rate of wound infection but stapling was significantly faster and less painful. The use of staples carries no risk of accidental needle-stick injury and should therefore be safer than suturing for the user.

摘要

在6个月的时间里,因头皮伤口前往圣母医院急诊科就诊的患者被随机分为两组,分别用尼龙缝线或金属吻合钉闭合伤口。每组有100名患者。在拆除缝线或吻合钉后5天(95%)进行复查,3周后(61%)再次复查。两组在年龄、性别、病因和伤口特征方面相似。发病率或伤口感染率没有差异,但使用吻合钉闭合伤口明显更快且疼痛较轻。使用吻合钉不存在意外针刺伤的风险,因此对使用者来说应该比缝合更安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验