Ritchie A J, Rocke L G
Accident and Emergency Department, Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast.
Injury. 1989 Jul;20(4):217-8. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90116-2.
Over a 6-month period, patients attending the Accident and Emergency Department of the Mater Infirmorum Hospital with scalp wounds were randomly allocated to one of two groups for closure of their wounds with either nylon sutures or metal staples. Each group contained 100 patients. Patients were reviewed at 5 days (95 per cent) after the removal of sutures or staples and again at 3 weeks (61 per cent). The two groups were similar for age, sex, aetiology and wound characteristics. There was no difference in morbidity or rate of wound infection but stapling was significantly faster and less painful. The use of staples carries no risk of accidental needle-stick injury and should therefore be safer than suturing for the user.
在6个月的时间里,因头皮伤口前往圣母医院急诊科就诊的患者被随机分为两组,分别用尼龙缝线或金属吻合钉闭合伤口。每组有100名患者。在拆除缝线或吻合钉后5天(95%)进行复查,3周后(61%)再次复查。两组在年龄、性别、病因和伤口特征方面相似。发病率或伤口感染率没有差异,但使用吻合钉闭合伤口明显更快且疼痛较轻。使用吻合钉不存在意外针刺伤的风险,因此对使用者来说应该比缝合更安全。