• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

富血小板血浆和微针穿刺联合皮下分离术与生理盐水和微针穿刺联合皮下分离术治疗外伤性瘢痕的比较。

Subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling versus subcision with saline and micro-needling in posttraumatic scars.

机构信息

Lecturer of Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Aug 19;316(8):537. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03226-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00403-024-03226-3
PMID:39158761
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In treating post-traumatic scars, this study compared the safety and effectiveness of combined subcision with saline and microneedling versus combined subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling. Combined subcision with saline and microneedling or combined subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling were used to treat 36 consecutive individuals with post-traumatic scarring. The Modified Manchester score was used to assess texture change, pigmentation, and surface distortion changes. Each change was given a score between 1 and 4. A lower score (range: 3-12) indicates a better result. The mean of the three individual scores was determined. For best outcomes, each patient needed four treatment sessions for each scar, with a one-month follow-up period following the final treatment. The three variables in group B had mean scores of 1.4 ± 0.5, 2 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 0.9, respectively, for texture change, pigmentation, and surface distortion. With a mean score of 1.4 ± 0.5, texture change had the best response out of the three variables we evaluated. The investigator determined that the mean improvement score for patients in group B's overall appearance was 5.61 ± 1.19. The study has shown that the combination of subcision with platelet-rich plasma, and microneedling appears to be a promising treatment for posttraumatic scars due to its low risk and high efficacy. Our findings suggest that this is a safe method for treating posttraumatic scars, with few side effects and a low chance of recurrence.

IRB LOCAL APPROVAL NUMBER

04-2023-300279.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT06135480.

摘要

背景

在治疗创伤后疤痕方面,本研究比较了联合切除加生理盐水和微针与联合切除加富血小板血浆和微针治疗创伤后疤痕的安全性和有效性。联合切除加生理盐水和微针或联合切除加富血小板血浆和微针用于治疗 36 例连续创伤后疤痕患者。采用改良曼彻斯特评分评估纹理变化、色素沉着和表面畸形变化。每个变化的评分在 1 到 4 之间。评分越低(范围 3-12)表示结果越好。三个个体评分的平均值。为获得最佳效果,每个患者每个疤痕需要进行四次治疗,最后一次治疗后进行为期一个月的随访。B 组的三个变量的平均评分为纹理变化 1.4±0.5、色素沉着 2±0.8 和表面畸形 2.2±0.9。纹理变化的平均评分为 1.4±0.5,在我们评估的三个变量中反应最好。研究者确定 B 组患者整体外观的平均改善评分是 5.61±1.19。该研究表明,联合切除加富血小板血浆和微针治疗创伤后疤痕的风险低、效果高,似乎是一种有前途的治疗方法。我们的研究结果表明,这是一种治疗创伤后疤痕的安全方法,副作用少,复发率低。

IRB 本地批准编号:04-2023-300279。

临床试验注册号

NCT06135480。

相似文献

1
Subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling versus subcision with saline and micro-needling in posttraumatic scars.富血小板血浆和微针穿刺联合皮下分离术与生理盐水和微针穿刺联合皮下分离术治疗外伤性瘢痕的比较。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Aug 19;316(8):537. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03226-3.
2
Combination therapy using subcision, needling, and platelet-rich plasma in the management of grade 4 atrophic acne scars: A pilot study.联合应用皮肤磨削术、微针和富血小板血浆治疗 4 级萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:一项初步研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Aug;18(4):1092-1097. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12935. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Treatment of atrophic acne scars using autologous platelet-rich plasma vs combined subcision and autologous platelet-rich plasma: A split-face comparative study.采用自体富血小板血浆与联合皮下分离术和自体富血小板血浆治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:一项对照性分面研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Feb;19(2):456-461. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13048. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Microneedling with autologous platelet-rich plasma versus microneedling with topical insulin in the treatment of postacne atrophic scars: A simultaneous split-face comparative study.自体富血小板血浆微针疗法与外用胰岛素微针疗法治疗痤疮后萎缩性瘢痕的同步半脸对照研究
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Mar;84(3):810-811. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.152. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Effectiveness of fractional erbium-YAG laser, microneedling, platelet-rich plasma in localized stable vitiligo patients: randomized clinical trial.点阵铒激光、微针、富血小板血浆治疗局限性稳定型白癜风患者的疗效:随机临床试验。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jun 15;316(7):399. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03035-8.
6
Treatment of Acne Scars with Microneedling and Chemical Reconstruction of Scarred Skin Therapy (CROSS) Using Penol/Croton Oil Combination.微针和化学重建瘢痕皮肤疗法(CROSS)联合使用苯酚/巴豆油治疗痤疮瘢痕。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2024 Jun 1;23(6):418-422. doi: 10.36849/JDD.7657.
7
Therapeutic effect of microneedling and autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of atrophic scars: A randomized study.微针疗法与自体富血小板血浆治疗萎缩性瘢痕的疗效:一项随机研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Sep;16(3):388-399. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12356. Epub 2017 May 14.
8
Platelet-rich plasma in noninvasive procedures for atrophic acne scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.富含血小板的血浆在非侵入性治疗萎缩性痤疮疤痕中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Apr;19(4):836-844. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13331. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling verses microneedling with distilled water in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: a concurrent split-face study.富自体血小板血浆联合微针与蒸馏水微针治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:一项同期半脸对照研究
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Dec;15(4):434-443. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12207. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling versus microneedling with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: Split-face study.联合自体富血小板血浆与微针治疗与非交联透明质酸微针治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:分面研究。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jan;34(1):e14457. doi: 10.1111/dth.14457. Epub 2020 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Combination therapy using subcision, needling, and platelet-rich plasma in the management of grade 4 atrophic acne scars: A pilot study.联合应用皮肤磨削术、微针和富血小板血浆治疗 4 级萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:一项初步研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Aug;18(4):1092-1097. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12935. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
2
Duration of Scar Maturation: Retrospective Analyses of 361 Hypertrophic Scars Over 5 Years.瘢痕成熟持续时间:对361例增生性瘢痕进行5年的回顾性分析。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019 Jan;32(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000547415.38888.c4.
3
A systematic review of treatments for acne scarring. Part 1: Non-energy-based techniques.
痤疮瘢痕治疗的系统评价。第1部分:非能量技术。
Scars Burn Heal. 2017 Mar 30;3:2059513117695312. doi: 10.1177/2059513117695312. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
4
Treatment of post-burn and post-traumatic atrophic scars with fractional CO laser: experience at a tertiary care centre.剥脱性二氧化碳激光治疗烧伤后及创伤后萎缩性瘢痕:三级护理中心的经验
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Jul;33(5):1039-1046. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2469-x. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
5
Microneedling combined with platelet-rich plasma or trichloroacetic acid peeling for management of acne scarring: A split-face clinical and histologic comparison.微针联合富血小板血浆或三氯乙酸剥脱术治疗痤疮瘢痕:一项半脸临床与组织学比较研究
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Feb;17(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12459. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
6
Skin microneedling plus platelet-rich plasma versus skin microneedling alone in the treatment of atrophic post acne scars: a split face comparative study.皮肤微针联合富血小板血浆与单纯皮肤微针对萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的治疗:一项半脸对照研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2018 May;29(3):281-286. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1365111. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
7
Microneedling therapy with and without platelet-rich plasma.有或无富血小板血浆的微针疗法。
Cutis. 2017 Apr;99(4):239-242.
8
Efficacy of fractionated microneedle radiofrequency with and without adding subcision for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scars: A randomized split-face clinical study.分次微针射频联合或不联合皮下分离术治疗萎缩性面部痤疮瘢痕的疗效:一项随机半脸临床研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Jun;16(2):223-229. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12346. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
9
Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury.肥厚性瘢痕形成:烧伤后最大的未解决挑战。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1427-1436. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4.
10
Posttraumatic stress symptomatology and appearance distress following burn injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.烧伤后创伤后应激症状学与外貌困扰:一项诠释现象学分析。
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1197-1204. doi: 10.1037/hea0000391. Epub 2016 Jun 9.