Department of Dermatology, Medical School, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Jan;34(1):e14457. doi: 10.1111/dth.14457. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
Acne scarring causes cosmetic discomfort, depression, low self-esteem and reduced quality of life. Microneedling is an established treatment for scars. A multimodality approach to scar treatment is usually necessary to achieve the best cosmetic results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet rich plasma (PRP) combined with microneedling in comparison with microneedling with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Forty-one patients of 20-40 years of age with atrophic acne scars were included. Microneedling was performed on both halves of the face. Topical application of PRP was given on right half of the face, while the left half of the face was treated with topical application of non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid. Four treatment sessions were given at an interval of 1 month consecutively. Goodman's Qualitative scale and the quartile grading scale are used for the final evaluation of results. There was a statistically significant improvement in acne scars after treatment among the studied group. Right and left halves showed 85.4% and 82.9% improvement, So the difference of the improvement between the two modalities is statistically insignificant P > 0.05 We conclude that microneedling has efficacy in the management of atrophic acne scars. It can be combined with either PRP or noncross-linked hyaluronic acid to enhance the final clinical outcomes in comparison with microneedling alone. The difference between the two modalities is insignificant.
痤疮瘢痕导致美容不适、抑郁、自卑和生活质量下降。微针是治疗瘢痕的成熟方法。通常需要多模式方法来治疗瘢痕,以获得最佳的美容效果。本研究的目的是评估富血小板血浆 (PRP) 联合微针与非交联透明质酸微针治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的疗效和安全性。
纳入了 41 名 20-40 岁的萎缩性痤疮瘢痕患者。在面部两侧进行微针治疗。右半脸给予 PRP 局部应用,左半脸给予非交联透明质酸局部应用。连续 1 个月,每月进行 4 次治疗。Goodman 定性量表和四分位分级量表用于最终评估结果。
研究组治疗后痤疮瘢痕有显著改善。右侧和左侧分别改善了 85.4%和 82.9%,因此两种治疗方法的改善差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
我们得出结论,微针治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕有效。它可以与 PRP 或非交联透明质酸联合使用,与单独微针治疗相比,可增强最终的临床疗效。两种方法的差异无统计学意义。