Suppr超能文献

采用以人为中心的设计方法,使用电子病历虚拟模拟来定义和衡量文档质量。

A human centered design approach to define and measure documentation quality using an EHR virtual simulation.

机构信息

Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0308992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308992. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) documentation serves multiple functions, including recording patient health status, enabling interprofessional communication, supporting billing, and providing data to support the quality infrastructure of a Learning Healthcare System. There is no definition and standardized method to assess documentation quality in EHRs. Using a human-centered design (HCD) approach, we define and describe a method to measure documentation quality. Documentation quality was defined as timely, accurate, user-centered, and efficient. Measurement of quality used a virtual simulated standardized patient visit via an EHR vendor platform. By observing and recording documentation efforts, nurse practitioners (NPs) (N = 12) documented the delivery of an Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) 4Ms (what Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) clinic visit using a standardized case. Results for timely documentation indicated considerable variability in completion times of documenting the 4Ms. Accuracy varied, as there were many types of episodes of erroneous documentation and extra time in seconds in documenting the 4Ms. The type and frequency of erroneous documentation efforts were related to navigation burden when navigating to different documentation tabs. The evaluated system demonstrated poor usability, with most participants scoring between 60 and 70 on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Efficiency, measured as click burden (the number of clicks used to navigate through a software system), revealed significant variability in the number of clicks required, with the NPs averaging approximately 13 clicks above the minimum requirement. The HCD methodology used in this study to assess the documentation quality proved feasible and provided valuable information on the quality of documentation. By assessing the quality of documentation, the gathered data can be leveraged to enhance documentation, optimize user experience, and elevate the quality of data within a Learning Healthcare System.

摘要

电子健康记录 (EHR) 文档具有多种功能,包括记录患者健康状况、实现跨专业交流、支持计费以及提供数据以支持学习型医疗保健系统的质量基础。目前,EHR 中没有用于评估文档质量的定义和标准化方法。我们采用以人为中心的设计 (HCD) 方法,定义并描述了一种测量文档质量的方法。文档质量被定义为及时、准确、以用户为中心和高效。通过 EHR 供应商平台的虚拟模拟标准化患者访问来衡量质量。通过观察和记录文档工作,执业护士 (NP)(N = 12)使用标准化案例记录了老年友善医疗保健系统 (AFHS) 4Ms(重要事项、药物、思维和活动)诊所访问的提供情况。及时记录的结果表明,记录 4Ms 的完成时间存在相当大的差异。准确性也存在差异,因为有许多类型的错误记录和记录 4Ms 时额外的秒数。错误记录工作的类型和频率与导航到不同文档选项卡时的导航负担有关。评估系统的可用性较差,大多数参与者在系统可用性量表 (SUS) 上的得分在 60 到 70 之间。效率,以点击负担(导航软件系统所需的点击次数)来衡量,显示出所需点击次数的显著差异,NP 平均点击次数比最低要求多 13 次左右。本研究中用于评估文档质量的 HCD 方法证明是可行的,并提供了有关文档质量的有价值信息。通过评估文档的质量,可以利用收集到的数据来改进文档、优化用户体验并提高学习型医疗保健系统中的数据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/aa9e6c677337/pone.0308992.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验