• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用以人为中心的设计方法,使用电子病历虚拟模拟来定义和衡量文档质量。

A human centered design approach to define and measure documentation quality using an EHR virtual simulation.

机构信息

Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0308992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308992. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308992
PMID:39159187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11332943/
Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) documentation serves multiple functions, including recording patient health status, enabling interprofessional communication, supporting billing, and providing data to support the quality infrastructure of a Learning Healthcare System. There is no definition and standardized method to assess documentation quality in EHRs. Using a human-centered design (HCD) approach, we define and describe a method to measure documentation quality. Documentation quality was defined as timely, accurate, user-centered, and efficient. Measurement of quality used a virtual simulated standardized patient visit via an EHR vendor platform. By observing and recording documentation efforts, nurse practitioners (NPs) (N = 12) documented the delivery of an Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) 4Ms (what Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) clinic visit using a standardized case. Results for timely documentation indicated considerable variability in completion times of documenting the 4Ms. Accuracy varied, as there were many types of episodes of erroneous documentation and extra time in seconds in documenting the 4Ms. The type and frequency of erroneous documentation efforts were related to navigation burden when navigating to different documentation tabs. The evaluated system demonstrated poor usability, with most participants scoring between 60 and 70 on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Efficiency, measured as click burden (the number of clicks used to navigate through a software system), revealed significant variability in the number of clicks required, with the NPs averaging approximately 13 clicks above the minimum requirement. The HCD methodology used in this study to assess the documentation quality proved feasible and provided valuable information on the quality of documentation. By assessing the quality of documentation, the gathered data can be leveraged to enhance documentation, optimize user experience, and elevate the quality of data within a Learning Healthcare System.

摘要

电子健康记录 (EHR) 文档具有多种功能,包括记录患者健康状况、实现跨专业交流、支持计费以及提供数据以支持学习型医疗保健系统的质量基础。目前,EHR 中没有用于评估文档质量的定义和标准化方法。我们采用以人为中心的设计 (HCD) 方法,定义并描述了一种测量文档质量的方法。文档质量被定义为及时、准确、以用户为中心和高效。通过 EHR 供应商平台的虚拟模拟标准化患者访问来衡量质量。通过观察和记录文档工作,执业护士 (NP)(N = 12)使用标准化案例记录了老年友善医疗保健系统 (AFHS) 4Ms(重要事项、药物、思维和活动)诊所访问的提供情况。及时记录的结果表明,记录 4Ms 的完成时间存在相当大的差异。准确性也存在差异,因为有许多类型的错误记录和记录 4Ms 时额外的秒数。错误记录工作的类型和频率与导航到不同文档选项卡时的导航负担有关。评估系统的可用性较差,大多数参与者在系统可用性量表 (SUS) 上的得分在 60 到 70 之间。效率,以点击负担(导航软件系统所需的点击次数)来衡量,显示出所需点击次数的显著差异,NP 平均点击次数比最低要求多 13 次左右。本研究中用于评估文档质量的 HCD 方法证明是可行的,并提供了有关文档质量的有价值信息。通过评估文档的质量,可以利用收集到的数据来改进文档、优化用户体验并提高学习型医疗保健系统中的数据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/bddd66b236a6/pone.0308992.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/aa9e6c677337/pone.0308992.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/52697930292e/pone.0308992.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/bddd66b236a6/pone.0308992.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/aa9e6c677337/pone.0308992.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/52697930292e/pone.0308992.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e5/11332943/bddd66b236a6/pone.0308992.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A human centered design approach to define and measure documentation quality using an EHR virtual simulation.采用以人为中心的设计方法,使用电子病历虚拟模拟来定义和衡量文档质量。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0308992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308992. eCollection 2024.
2
Achievement of age-friendly health systems committed to care excellence designation in a convenient care health care system.在便捷医疗保健系统中实现以关爱卓越为目标的老年友好型卫生系统。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):89-99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14071. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
The implementation of a multidisciplinary, electronic health record embedded care pathway to improve structured data recording and decrease electronic health record burden.实施多学科、嵌入电子病历的护理路径,以改善结构化数据记录并减轻电子病历负担。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Apr;184:105344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105344. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
Electronic health record innovations: Helping physicians - One less click at a time.电子健康记录创新:帮助医生——一次少点击一次。
Health Inf Manag. 2017 Sep;46(3):140-144. doi: 10.1177/1833358316689481. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Evaluating the usability of speech recognition to create clinical documentation using a commercial electronic health record.评估使用商业电子健康记录的语音识别创建临床文档的可用性。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 May;113:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Usability Evaluation of an EHR's Clinical Notes Interface from the Perspective of Attending and Resident Physicians: An Exploratory Study.从主治医生和住院医生角度对电子健康记录临床笔记界面的可用性评估:一项探索性研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1128-1132.
7
Improving documentation of quality measures in the electronic health record.改善电子健康记录中质量指标的文档记录。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015 Jun;27(6):308-12. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12169. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
8
A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.一个用于评估电子健康记录供应商以用户为中心的设计和可用性测试流程的框架。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e35-e39. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw092.
9
Hospital adoption of electronic health record functions to support age-friendly care: results from a national survey.医院采用电子健康记录功能以支持老年友好型护理:来自全国性调查的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1206-1213. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa129.
10
Association of Electronic Health Record Use With Physician Fatigue and Efficiency.电子病历使用与医生疲劳和效率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207385. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7385.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving health care efficiency one click at a time.一次点击,提高医疗效率。
Intern Med J. 2023 Jul;53(7):1261-1264. doi: 10.1111/imj.16160. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study.让卫生专业人员参与制定质量和安全仪表板:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e42649. doi: 10.2196/42649.
3
Novel Note Templates to Enhance Signal and Reduce Noise in Medical Documentation: Prospective Improvement Study.新型笔记模板以增强医学文档中的信号并减少噪声:前瞻性改进研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 12;7:e41223. doi: 10.2196/41223.
4
Health professionals' routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study.在资源有限的环境中,卫生专业人员的常规实践文档记录及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Feb;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100699.
5
A framework for understanding, designing, developing and evaluating learning health systems.一个用于理解、设计、开发和评估学习型健康系统的框架。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 May 20;7(1):e10315. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10315. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Usability of Graphical User Interfaces With Semiautomatic Delabeling Feature to Improve Drug Allergy Documentation.具有半自动去标签功能的图形用户界面的可用性可提高药物过敏记录。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Feb;11(2):519-526.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
7
Usability, acceptability and feasibility of a novel technology with visual guidance with video and audio recording during newborn resuscitation: a pilot study.一种具有视频和音频记录功能的新型可视引导技术在新生儿复苏中的可用性、可接受性和可行性:一项初步研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Dec;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100667.
8
Achievement of age-friendly health systems committed to care excellence designation in a convenient care health care system.在便捷医疗保健系统中实现以关爱卓越为目标的老年友好型卫生系统。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):89-99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14071. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
9
Identifying and adapting interventions to reduce documentation burden and improve nurses' efficiency in using electronic health record systems (The IDEA Study): protocol for a mixed methods study.识别并调整干预措施以减轻文档负担并提高护士使用电子健康记录系统的效率(IDEA研究):一项混合方法研究的方案
BMC Nurs. 2022 Aug 4;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00989-w.
10
The Impact of Structured and Standardized Documentation on Documentation Quality; a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.结构化和标准化文档对文档质量的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Syst. 2022 May 27;46(7):46. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01837-9.