Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024 Nov;73:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103122. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Considering activity level propositions in the evaluation of forensic biology findings is becoming more common place. There are increasing numbers of publications demonstrating different transfer mechanisms that can occur under a variety of circumstances. Some of these publications have shown the possibility of DNA transfer from site to site on an exhibit, for instance as a result of packaging and transport. If such a possibility exists, and the case circumstances are such that the area on an exhibit where DNA is present or absent is an observation that is an important diagnostic characteristic given the propositions, then site to site transfer should be taken into account during the evaluation of observations. In this work we demonstrate the ways in which site to site transfer can be built into Bayesian networks when carrying out activity level evaluations of forensic biology findings. We explore the effects of considering qualitative vs quantitative categorisation of DNA results. We also show the importance of taking into account multiple individual's DNA being transferred (such as unknown or wearer DNA), even if the main focus of the evaluation is the activity of one individual.
考虑活动水平假设在法医生物学发现的评估中变得越来越普遍。越来越多的出版物证明了在各种情况下可能发生的不同转移机制。其中一些出版物已经表明,DNA 有可能从展品上的一个地点转移到另一个地点,例如由于包装和运输。如果这种可能性存在,并且案件情况是,展品上存在或不存在 DNA 的区域是根据假设的一个重要诊断特征的观察结果,那么在评估观察结果时,应该考虑到从一个地点到另一个地点的转移。在这项工作中,我们展示了当对法医生物学发现进行活动水平评估时,如何将地点间转移纳入贝叶斯网络中。我们探讨了考虑 DNA 结果的定性与定量分类的影响。我们还表明,即使评估的主要重点是一个人的活动,考虑多个个体的 DNA 被转移(例如未知或佩戴者 DNA)也是很重要的。