Vander Woude Catherine A, Buszkiewicz James H, Travis Nargiz, James LaTeesa N, Fleischer Nancy L
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown Medical University, Washington, District of Columbia.
AJPM Focus. 2024 Jul 3;3(5):100256. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100256. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Since the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement in the U.S., many studies have examined the associations between tobacco control policies and smoking; however, there is a need to comprehensively examine the impact of these policies on sociodemographic disparities in cigarette smoking. This protocol outlines a systematic review that seeks to fill this gap. Quantitative observational, experimental, and quasi-experimental studies are eligible for inclusion. Policies include cigarette taxes, smoke-free air laws, anti-tobacco media campaigns, and Tobacco 21 laws implemented in the U.S. Outcomes include cigarette smoking initiation, prevalence, and cessation among youth and adults. Sources to be searched include Clarivate BIOSIS, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. Included studies must be written in English. Two independent reviewers will screen and analyze relevant articles and then extract data on participants, context, methods, and key findings. Studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and presented in 2 reviews: 1 youth focused (aged <18 years) and 1 adult focused (aged ≥18 years). The findings are intended to inform the creation of new and potentially more targeted tobacco control policies to improve health equity.
自1998年美国达成《主协议和解协议》以来,许多研究探讨了烟草控制政策与吸烟之间的关联;然而,有必要全面审视这些政策对吸烟方面社会人口学差异的影响。本方案概述了一项旨在填补这一空白的系统评价。纳入的研究类型包括定量观察性、实验性和准实验性研究。政策包括香烟税、无烟空气法、反烟草媒体宣传活动以及美国实施的21岁烟草销售限制法。研究结果包括青少年和成年人的吸烟开始率、吸烟流行率和戒烟情况。检索的来源包括科睿唯安BIOSIS、EBSCO CINAHL Plus、考克兰图书馆、Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO、《社会学摘要》、科睿唯安科学网核心合集以及美国国家经济研究局。纳入的研究必须用英文撰写。两名独立评审员将筛选和分析相关文章,然后提取关于参与者、背景、方法和主要发现的数据。将使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价清单对研究进行评估,并在两项评价中呈现:一项聚焦青少年(年龄<18岁),另一项聚焦成年人(年龄≥18岁)。研究结果旨在为制定新的、可能更具针对性的烟草控制政策提供参考,以改善健康公平性。