• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2024 年美国大选的非政治风险评估:大规模骚乱和严重商业中断的威胁。

An apolitical risk assessment of the 2024 US elections: The threat of widespread riots and significant business disruption.

机构信息

Sigma7.

Apple.

出版信息

J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2024 Jan 1;18(1):6-38.

PMID:39164865
Abstract

Civil disorder has always plagued humanity, with violence being triggered by real or perceived grievances, rumours and speculation, and internal or external agitators. The risk to people, communities, businesses and the rule of law is not isolated to a particular country or society. The propensity for violence and how it is incited is, however, an evolving threat with the advent of the 'modern riot'. The causes of violence centre on economic and social injustice, sports- and event-related riots, a reaction to police or security forces and political unrest. As the US nears the contentious 2024 elections, the failing trust in the three branches of government combined with external global tensions and conflict, threats from domestic extremist groups, a rising acceptance of violence as a means of settling political disagreements, hostile nation actors and international terror groups that exploit societal instability create fertile conditions for widespread violence. Exacerbating these factors are the risks from artificial intelligence (AI) deepfake, rapid mass communications, the citizen journalist, prominent influencers amplifying grievances and inflammatory media reporting. This convergence of exacerbators and accelerants for political discord offers the potential for serious security risks and significant business disruption.

摘要

社会动荡一直困扰着人类,暴力往往由真实或感知到的冤情、谣言和猜测,以及内部或外部的煽动者所引发。这种对人民、社区、企业和法治的威胁不仅局限于特定的国家或社会。然而,随着“现代暴乱”的出现,暴力的倾向及其煽动方式是一种不断演变的威胁。暴力的根源集中在经济和社会不公正、与体育和活动相关的骚乱、对警察或安全部队的反应以及政治动荡上。随着美国临近有争议的 2024 年选举,对政府三个分支的信任不断下降,加上外部全球紧张局势和冲突、来自国内极端组织的威胁、越来越多地接受暴力作为解决政治分歧的手段、敌对国家行为体和利用社会不稳定的国际恐怖组织,为广泛的暴力行为创造了有利条件。加剧这些因素的是人工智能 (AI) 深度伪造、快速大规模通信、公民记者、放大冤情和煽动性媒体报道的知名影响者的风险。这些加剧和加速政治不和的因素有可能带来严重的安全风险和重大的业务中断。

相似文献

1
An apolitical risk assessment of the 2024 US elections: The threat of widespread riots and significant business disruption.2024 年美国大选的非政治风险评估:大规模骚乱和严重商业中断的威胁。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2024 Jan 1;18(1):6-38.
2
Effect of civil unrest on the incidence of violent and non-natural deaths.内乱对暴力死亡和非自然死亡发生率的影响。
S Afr Med J. 1986 Jul 19;70(2):83-8.
3
Contagion to unrest: Investigating the link between disease and civil unrest in Africa.传染病与动乱的关联:探究非洲疾病与社会动荡之间的关系。
Politics Life Sci. 2024;43(1):24-33. doi: 10.1017/pls.2023.27. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
Clashes and crowds: protests, riots, and other mass gathering events in North America 2021-2022.冲突与人群:北美 2021-2022 年的抗议、暴乱及其他聚众事件。
Public Health. 2023 Aug;221:166-169. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
5
Biologic, Chemical, and Radiation Terrorism Review生物、化学和辐射恐怖主义综述
6
The liberal society, Black youths, and the ghetto riots.
Psychiatry. 1970 May;33(2):265-81. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1970.11023628.
7
Youth unrest.青年动荡。
Am J Psychiatry. 1969 Jul;126(1):122-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.126.1.122-a.
8
Riots and subways, a relationship moderated by the neighborhood's income level.骚乱和地铁,两者的关系受到邻里收入水平的调节。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14859-7.
9
Riots of : An analysis of societal reactions to contemporary riots in disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the Netherlands.《关于……的骚乱:荷兰贫困社区当代骚乱的社会反应分析》 (你提供的原文“Riots of :”这里似乎有缺失内容,我按照常规理解补充了“关于……的骚乱”这样的表述来使译文更通顺完整。)
Eur J Criminol. 2016 Nov;13(6):714-726. doi: 10.1177/1477370816633725. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Gun violence in Nigeria: a focus on ethno-religious conflict in Kano.尼日利亚的枪支暴力:以卡诺的民族宗教冲突为重点。
J Public Health Policy. 2007 Dec;28(4):420-31. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200155.