• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的主动脉夹层住院死亡率预测模型:重症医学视角的见解

Machine learning-based prognostic model for in-hospital mortality of aortic dissection: Insights from an intensive care medicine perspective.

作者信息

Lei Jiahao, Zhang Zhuojing, Li Yixuan, Wu Zhaoyu, Pu Hongji, Xu Zhijue, Yang Xinrui, Hu Jiateng, Liu Guang, Qiu Peng, Chen Tao, Lu Xinwu

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai People's Republic of China.

Department of Economics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Aug 19;10:20552076241269450. doi: 10.1177/20552076241269450. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241269450
PMID:39165387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334245/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe emergency with high morbidity and mortality, necessitating strict monitoring and management. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors and establish predictive models for in-hospital mortality among AD patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We retrieved ICU admission records of AD patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV critical care data set and the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Functional data analysis was further applied to estimate continuous vital sign processes, and variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified through univariate analyses. Subsequently, we employed multivariable logistic regression and machine learning techniques, including simple decision tree, random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop prognostic models for in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Given 643 ICU admissions from MIMIC-IV and 501 admissions from eICU, 29 and 28 prognostic factors were identified from each database through univariate analyses, respectively. For prognostic model construction, 507 MIMIC-IV admissions were divided into 406 (80%) for training and 101 (20%) for internal validation, and 87 eICU admissions were included as an external validation group. Of the four models tested, the RF consistently exhibited the best performance among different variable subsets, boasting area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.870 and 0.850. The models highlighted the mean 24-h fluid intake as the most potent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The current prognostic models effectively forecasted in-hospital mortality among AD patients, and they pinpointed noteworthy prognostic factors, including initial blood pressure upon ICU admission and mean 24-h fluid intake.

摘要

目的

主动脉夹层(AD)是一种严重的急症,发病率和死亡率高,需要严格监测和管理。本回顾性研究旨在确定重症监护病房(ICU)中AD患者院内死亡的预后因素并建立预测模型。

方法

我们从重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC)-IV重症监护数据集和电子ICU协作研究数据库中检索了AD患者的ICU入院记录。进一步应用功能数据分析来估计连续生命体征过程,并通过单变量分析确定与院内死亡相关的变量。随后,我们采用多变量逻辑回归和机器学习技术,包括简单决策树、随机森林(RF)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)来建立院内死亡的预后模型。

结果

鉴于来自MIMIC-IV的643例ICU入院病例和来自电子ICU的501例入院病例,通过单变量分析分别从每个数据库中确定了29个和28个预后因素。对于预后模型构建,将507例MIMIC-IV入院病例分为406例(80%)用于训练和101例(20%)用于内部验证,并将87例电子ICU入院病例作为外部验证组。在测试的四个模型中,RF在不同变量子集中始终表现出最佳性能,受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.870和0.850。模型突出显示平均24小时液体摄入量是最有力的预后因素。

结论

当前的预后模型有效地预测了AD患者的院内死亡率,并确定了值得注意的预后因素,包括ICU入院时的初始血压和平均24小时液体摄入量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2001/11334245/327a37fcfc3c/10.1177_20552076241269450-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2001/11334245/504b615f10cf/10.1177_20552076241269450-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2001/11334245/327a37fcfc3c/10.1177_20552076241269450-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2001/11334245/504b615f10cf/10.1177_20552076241269450-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2001/11334245/327a37fcfc3c/10.1177_20552076241269450-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning-based prognostic model for in-hospital mortality of aortic dissection: Insights from an intensive care medicine perspective.基于机器学习的主动脉夹层住院死亡率预测模型:重症医学视角的见解
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 19;10:20552076241269450. doi: 10.1177/20552076241269450. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Machine learning prediction models and nomogram to predict the risk of in-hospital death for severe DKA: A clinical study based on MIMIC-IV, eICU databases, and a college hospital ICU.基于 MIMIC-IV、eICU 数据库和一家大学医院 ICU 的临床研究:机器学习预测模型和诺莫图预测严重 DKA 患者院内死亡风险
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jun;174:105049. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105049. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.应用机器学习模型预测伴有冠状动脉疾病的慢性肾脏病患者的院内死亡率。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00995-x.
4
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
5
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
6
Machine-learning-derived online prediction models of outcomes for patients with cholelithiasis-induced acute cholangitis: development and validation in two retrospective cohorts.基于机器学习的胆石症所致急性胆管炎患者预后在线预测模型:在两个回顾性队列中的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 5;76:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102820. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for sepsis-associated delirium in the intensive care unit.基于机器学习的 ICU 相关性脓毒症谵妄预测模型的开发。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 4;13(1):12697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38650-4.
8
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.机器学习在预测 ICU 收治的肺癌患者院内死亡率中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280606. eCollection 2023.
9
A machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with hip fracture: An internal and external validated study.基于机器学习的危重症髋部骨折患者院内死亡率预测模型:内部和外部验证研究。
Injury. 2023 Feb;54(2):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.11.031. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
10
Prediction model of in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients with cardiac arrest: a retrospective analysis of MIMIC -IV database based on machine learning.基于机器学习的 MIMIC-IV 数据库中 ICU 心搏骤停患者院内死亡率预测模型:回顾性分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 25;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02138-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Twenty-five years of observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) and its impact on the cardiovascular scientific community.国际急性主动脉夹层注册研究(IRAD)25 年的观察结果及其对心血管科学界的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;168(4):977-989.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.06.021. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
3
Forewarned Is Forearmed: Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Catheter-Induced Coronary and Aortic Injuries.
有备无患:用于预测导管相关性冠状动脉和主动脉损伤的机器学习算法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 18;19(24):17002. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417002.
4
2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022 ACC/AHA 血管疾病诊断与管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
Clinical Characteristics, Incidences, and Mortality Rates for Type A and B Aortic Dissections: A Nationwide Danish Population-Based Cohort Study From 1996 to 2016.临床特征、发病率和死亡率 A 型和 B 型主动脉夹层:1996 年至 2016 年丹麦全国基于人群的队列研究。
Circulation. 2022 Dec 20;146(25):1903-1917. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061065. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
Prognostic Impact of Blood Pressure Change Patterns on Patients With Aortic Dissection After Admission.入院后血压变化模式对主动脉夹层患者的预后影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 3;9:832770. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.832770. eCollection 2022.
7
Potential Clinical Value of Biomarker-Guided Emergency Triage for Thoracic Aortic Dissection.生物标志物指导的胸主动脉夹层急诊分诊的潜在临床价值
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 12;8:777327. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.777327. eCollection 2021.
8
Clinical Analysis of Risk Factors for Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Single Study From China.A型急性主动脉夹层患者死亡危险因素的临床分析:一项来自中国的单中心研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 4;8:728568. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.728568. eCollection 2021.
9
Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and the Risk of Aortic Dissection Incidence and Mortality: Results From the J-SCH Study, the UK Biobank Study, and a Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.血压、高血压与主动脉夹层发病和死亡风险:来自 J-SCH 研究、英国生物库研究和队列研究荟萃分析的结果。
Circulation. 2022 Mar;145(9):633-644. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056546. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
10
Machine Learning Models for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Aortic Dissection Patients.用于预测急性主动脉夹层患者院内死亡率的机器学习模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 17;8:727773. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.727773. eCollection 2021.