Leal António Rui Marcelino, Pinto da Costa Maria José, Amado João Costa
Medicina Legal, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal.
Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024 Aug 5;22(1):e20231194. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1194. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
Based on personal experience over several years, we carried out a comparative analysis of two different European health systems, in Portugal and France, from a perspective comparing occupational medicine and use of telemedicine in a postpandemic context. This analysis addressed four aspects: Health System; Occupational Medicine; Telemedicine/Telework; and Future and Suggestions. The study employed searches and review of recent articles, guidelines, and recommendations from the authorities responsible for regulation (Medical Doctors Order, Labor Legislation, and Medical Collegiate Recommendations) and analysis of some statistical indicators from recent studies. Three tables on Occupational Health and Medicine present some relevant data and facilitate comparisons. Despite the difficulties of comparison, given the basic differences between these two systems (Beveridge . Bismark), it can be concluded that there is a greater acceptance of judicious use of teleconsultation in France (from 15 to 35%). This includes its use by occupational nurses, in the context of the "Visite de Information et Prevention", with good acceptance among employers and employees. There are still some difficulties to be resolved concerning security, conducting biometrics, and objective examinations. We expect that these issues will be overcome with improved biosensing, adequate training, and proper regulation. Given the shortage of occupational physicians and the customary overrunning of legal deadlines, we believe that these possibilities and suggestions should be explored and adopted by the specialty's Collegiates. Certain recommendations to this effect are made.
基于多年的个人经验,我们从大流行后背景下比较职业医学和远程医疗使用的角度,对葡萄牙和法国这两个不同的欧洲卫生系统进行了比较分析。该分析涉及四个方面:卫生系统;职业医学;远程医疗/远程工作;以及未来与建议。该研究采用了对近期文章、指南以及监管当局(医生命令、劳动立法和医学协会建议)的建议进行检索和审查,并对近期研究中的一些统计指标进行分析。三张关于职业健康与医学的表格展示了一些相关数据并便于比较。尽管由于这两种系统(贝弗里奇体系和俾斯麦体系)之间的基本差异而存在比较困难,但可以得出结论,法国对明智使用远程会诊的接受程度更高(从15%到35%)。这包括职业护士在“信息与预防访问”背景下使用远程会诊,雇主和雇员对此接受度良好。在安全、进行生物识别和客观检查方面仍有一些困难需要解决。我们预计,随着生物传感技术的改进、充分的培训和适当的监管,这些问题将得到克服。鉴于职业医生短缺以及法定最后期限经常超期,我们认为该专业的协会应探索并采用这些可能性和建议。为此提出了某些建议。